行为法学:对法律和行为事前功能的认识探索

Q3 Social Sciences
B. Rooij
{"title":"行为法学:对法律和行为事前功能的认识探索","authors":"B. Rooij","doi":"10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A vital function of law is to reduce misconduct and damaging behavior. In order to do so, law needs to somehow come to shape human and organisational behavior. This requires a different approach to law and behavior, an approach that does not look solely at what is the fair and legally sound way to respond to misconduct after it has happened (ex-post), but also how legal rules can shape behavior in the future and thus steer it before it happens (ex-ante). This paper discusses what body of existing empirical knowledge exists to support the law's ex-ante function. It also analyses what biases in traditional ex-post legal thinking obstruct a successful application of the ex-ante empirical knowledge. Doing so it argues for a behavioral jurisprudence that makes the ex-ante function of law central and that corrects biases and flawed assumptions in legal thinking and education.","PeriodicalId":36820,"journal":{"name":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral Jurisprudence: The Quest for Knowledge about the Ex-ante Function of Law and Behavior\",\"authors\":\"B. Rooij\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A vital function of law is to reduce misconduct and damaging behavior. In order to do so, law needs to somehow come to shape human and organisational behavior. This requires a different approach to law and behavior, an approach that does not look solely at what is the fair and legally sound way to respond to misconduct after it has happened (ex-post), but also how legal rules can shape behavior in the future and thus steer it before it happens (ex-ante). This paper discusses what body of existing empirical knowledge exists to support the law's ex-ante function. It also analyses what biases in traditional ex-post legal thinking obstruct a successful application of the ex-ante empirical knowledge. Doing so it argues for a behavioral jurisprudence that makes the ex-ante function of law central and that corrects biases and flawed assumptions in legal thinking and education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JRLS/JLZ016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

法律的一个重要功能是减少不当行为和破坏性行为。为了做到这一点,法律需要以某种方式来塑造人类和组织的行为。这需要一种不同的法律和行为方法,这种方法不仅要关注在不当行为发生后(事后)做出反应的公平和合法的方式,而且还要关注法律规则如何在未来塑造行为,从而在行为发生之前(事前)引导它。本文讨论了现有的经验知识体系是如何支持法律的事前功能的。本文还分析了传统事后法律思维中的偏见是什么阻碍了事前经验知识的成功应用。在此过程中,它主张一种行为法学,使法律的事前功能成为核心,并纠正法律思想和教育中的偏见和有缺陷的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioral Jurisprudence: The Quest for Knowledge about the Ex-ante Function of Law and Behavior
A vital function of law is to reduce misconduct and damaging behavior. In order to do so, law needs to somehow come to shape human and organisational behavior. This requires a different approach to law and behavior, an approach that does not look solely at what is the fair and legally sound way to respond to misconduct after it has happened (ex-post), but also how legal rules can shape behavior in the future and thus steer it before it happens (ex-ante). This paper discusses what body of existing empirical knowledge exists to support the law's ex-ante function. It also analyses what biases in traditional ex-post legal thinking obstruct a successful application of the ex-ante empirical knowledge. Doing so it argues for a behavioral jurisprudence that makes the ex-ante function of law central and that corrects biases and flawed assumptions in legal thinking and education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies
Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信