埋葬

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Stephen Engel
{"title":"埋葬","authors":"Stephen Engel","doi":"10.1080/13642529.2023.2172522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The following is an historical fiction about a burial that took place in Sunghir, Russia, circa 32,000 B.C.E. It is historical in the sense that it is based on archaeological evidence of the grave. It is fiction in the sense that it invents a story around the grave that has no substrate in an archive. Since the grave's excavation in 1969, many archaeologists have interpreted it as an early example of the unearned status of elites, though some other interpretations exist. My aim is to describe, in Saidiya Hartman’s phrasing, ‘what might have happened or what might have been said or what might have been done’ where archive and artifacts do not go. Even if such a fiction does not recover an ‘unrecoverable past’, it might nevertheless succeed at what historical fiction does best: making us feel, through force of detail, as though it were real and as though we were there.","PeriodicalId":46004,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking History","volume":"27 1","pages":"340 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burial\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Engel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13642529.2023.2172522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The following is an historical fiction about a burial that took place in Sunghir, Russia, circa 32,000 B.C.E. It is historical in the sense that it is based on archaeological evidence of the grave. It is fiction in the sense that it invents a story around the grave that has no substrate in an archive. Since the grave's excavation in 1969, many archaeologists have interpreted it as an early example of the unearned status of elites, though some other interpretations exist. My aim is to describe, in Saidiya Hartman’s phrasing, ‘what might have happened or what might have been said or what might have been done’ where archive and artifacts do not go. Even if such a fiction does not recover an ‘unrecoverable past’, it might nevertheless succeed at what historical fiction does best: making us feel, through force of detail, as though it were real and as though we were there.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking History\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2023.2172522\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2023.2172522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是一个关于大约公元前32000年发生在俄罗斯Sunghir的一场葬礼的历史小说。从这个意义上说,它是基于坟墓的考古证据。从某种意义上说,它是虚构的,它围绕着坟墓编造了一个故事,而这个故事在档案中没有基质。自1969年该坟墓被发掘以来,许多考古学家将其解释为精英不劳而获地位的早期例子,尽管也存在其他一些解释。我的目的是描述,用赛迪亚·哈特曼的话来说,“可能发生了什么,或者可能说了什么,或者可能做了什么”,档案和文物没有去的地方。即使这样的小说没有重现“无法挽回的过去”,它也可能在历史小说最擅长的方面取得成功:通过细节的力量,让我们觉得它是真实的,好像我们就在那里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Burial
ABSTRACT The following is an historical fiction about a burial that took place in Sunghir, Russia, circa 32,000 B.C.E. It is historical in the sense that it is based on archaeological evidence of the grave. It is fiction in the sense that it invents a story around the grave that has no substrate in an archive. Since the grave's excavation in 1969, many archaeologists have interpreted it as an early example of the unearned status of elites, though some other interpretations exist. My aim is to describe, in Saidiya Hartman’s phrasing, ‘what might have happened or what might have been said or what might have been done’ where archive and artifacts do not go. Even if such a fiction does not recover an ‘unrecoverable past’, it might nevertheless succeed at what historical fiction does best: making us feel, through force of detail, as though it were real and as though we were there.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking History
Rethinking History Multiple-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: This acclaimed journal allows historians in a broad range of specialities to experiment with new ways of presenting and interpreting history. Rethinking History challenges the accepted ways of doing history and rethinks the traditional paradigms, providing a unique forum in which practitioners and theorists can debate and expand the boundaries of the discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信