寻找内燃机的替代品:科学家和工程师之间制度逻辑的实例化机制

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Byungchae Jin, D. Kirsch
{"title":"寻找内燃机的替代品:科学家和工程师之间制度逻辑的实例化机制","authors":"Byungchae Jin, D. Kirsch","doi":"10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While much of the institutional research has suggested and empirically demonstrated that institutional logics shape cognitive and behavioural patterns of actors, what still remains unclear is how scientists and engineers instantiate the conceptual elements of institutional logics in the context of the emergence of new technologies. We demonstrate the mechanisms through which scientists and engineers use the conceptual elements of multiple institutional logics in response to changes in external socio-economic and political conditions to justify their own research activities. Our context is the forty-year search for alternatives to internal combustion within a leading international conference on electric and hybrid electric vehicles (EVS). Combining Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) and inductive methods, we identify four distinct instantiation mechanisms – contextualising, spanning, appropriating, and conflating – that scientists and engineers searching for a successful alternative to internal combustion used to instantiate the institutional logics within which they were embedded.","PeriodicalId":13585,"journal":{"name":"Industry and Innovation","volume":"29 1","pages":"1231 - 1262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The search for alternatives to internal combustion: instantiation mechanisms of institutional logics among scientists and engineers\",\"authors\":\"Byungchae Jin, D. Kirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT While much of the institutional research has suggested and empirically demonstrated that institutional logics shape cognitive and behavioural patterns of actors, what still remains unclear is how scientists and engineers instantiate the conceptual elements of institutional logics in the context of the emergence of new technologies. We demonstrate the mechanisms through which scientists and engineers use the conceptual elements of multiple institutional logics in response to changes in external socio-economic and political conditions to justify their own research activities. Our context is the forty-year search for alternatives to internal combustion within a leading international conference on electric and hybrid electric vehicles (EVS). Combining Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) and inductive methods, we identify four distinct instantiation mechanisms – contextualising, spanning, appropriating, and conflating – that scientists and engineers searching for a successful alternative to internal combustion used to instantiate the institutional logics within which they were embedded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industry and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"1231 - 1262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industry and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industry and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然许多制度研究已经提出并实证地证明了制度逻辑塑造了行动者的认知和行为模式,但科学家和工程师如何在新技术出现的背景下实例化制度逻辑的概念要素仍不清楚。我们展示了科学家和工程师利用多重制度逻辑的概念要素来应对外部社会经济和政治条件变化的机制,以证明他们自己的研究活动是合理的。我们的背景是在一个领先的电动和混合动力电动汽车(EVS)国际会议上四十年来寻找内燃机的替代品。结合计算机辅助文本分析(CATA)和归纳方法,我们确定了四种不同的实例化机制——语境化、跨越、挪用和合并——科学家和工程师们正在寻找一种成功的替代内燃的方法来实例化嵌入其中的制度逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The search for alternatives to internal combustion: instantiation mechanisms of institutional logics among scientists and engineers
ABSTRACT While much of the institutional research has suggested and empirically demonstrated that institutional logics shape cognitive and behavioural patterns of actors, what still remains unclear is how scientists and engineers instantiate the conceptual elements of institutional logics in the context of the emergence of new technologies. We demonstrate the mechanisms through which scientists and engineers use the conceptual elements of multiple institutional logics in response to changes in external socio-economic and political conditions to justify their own research activities. Our context is the forty-year search for alternatives to internal combustion within a leading international conference on electric and hybrid electric vehicles (EVS). Combining Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) and inductive methods, we identify four distinct instantiation mechanisms – contextualising, spanning, appropriating, and conflating – that scientists and engineers searching for a successful alternative to internal combustion used to instantiate the institutional logics within which they were embedded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Industry and Innovation is an international refereed journal presenting high-quality original scholarship of the dynamics of industries and innovation. Interdisciplinary in nature, Industry and Innovation is informed by, and contributes in turn to, advancing the theoretical frontier within economics, organization theory, and economic geography. Theoretical issues encompass: •What are the institutional underpinnings for different organizational forms? •How are different industrial structures and institutions related to innovation patterns and economic performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信