让我们明确区分基于证据的实践和经验支持的治疗方法

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK

SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2019-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316

J. Drisko, A. Friedman

{"title":"让我们明确区分基于证据的实践和经验支持的治疗方法","authors":"J. Drisko, A. Friedman","doi":"10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.","PeriodicalId":45273,"journal":{"name":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let’s Clearly Distinguish Evidence-based Practice and Empirically Supported Treatments\",\"authors\":\"J. Drisko, A. Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1706316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

循证实践对社会工作实践、研究和教育产生了巨大的影响。EBP是一个多步骤的医疗保健决策过程，包括治疗计划中的相关研究结果以及客户的偏好和临床专业知识。经验支持的治疗方法[EST]是对符合特定研究质量标准的特定疾病的治疗方法的指定。EST通常是EBP过程的一部分，但与之不同。本文报告了对社会工作摘要数据库中相关200篇文章的审查结果，表明社会工作者无法区分这两个概念，而且往往无法全面、清晰地定义它们。更多已发表的报告将无害环境技术与EBP混为一谈，而不是正确区分这两个概念。提出了加强未来社会工作出版物、实践和教育的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Let’s Clearly Distinguish Evidence-based Practice and Empirically Supported Treatments

ABSTRACT Evidence based practice [EBP] has had a strong influence on social work practice, research, and education. EBP is a multi-step process for health care decision making which includes relevant research findings in treatment planning together with the client’s preferences and clinical expertise. An empirically supported treatments [EST] is a designation for treatments for a given disorder that have met specific standards for research quality. ESTs are often part of the EBP process but are not identical to it. This article reports results from a review of relevant 200 articles from the Social Work Abstracts database, showing social workers fail to distinguish the two concepts, and often fail to define them fully and clearly. More published reports conflate ESTs with EBP than correctly distinguish the two concepts. Recommendation to strengthen future social work publications, practice and education are offered.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK SOCIAL WORK-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Smith College Studies in Social Work focuses on the vital issues facing practitioners today, featuring only those articles that advance theoretical understanding of psychological and social functioning, present clinically relevant research findings, and promote excellence in clinical practice. This refereed journal addresses issues of mental health, therapeutic process, trauma and recovery, psychopathology, racial and cultural diversity, culturally responsive clinical practice, intersubjectivity, the influence of postmodern theory on clinical practice, community based practice, and clinical services for specific populations of psychologically and socially vulnerable clients.