井下流体仪器故障频率与使用时间的相关性分析

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Xiao Tian, Guoying Su
{"title":"井下流体仪器故障频率与使用时间的相关性分析","authors":"Xiao Tian,&nbsp;Guoying Su","doi":"10.1016/j.geog.2022.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we make a statistical analysis of the fault information of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models in China from January 2021 to May 2022 based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, and compare the fault statistics of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models during the study period. The results show that: (1) The numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are basically positively correlated with the numbers of the corresponding instruments, with good consistency. Moreover, the automatic observation instruments (8 models) with more than 30 units are significantly correlated at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level). Even at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level), there are 7 models (7/8) with significant correlation. (2) The positive and negative correlations between the monthly average number of faults and the corresponding service times of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are random, and there are 9 models (75%) with no significant correlation at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level), while 12 models (100%) with no significant correlation at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level). (3) The monthly average numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models are basically 0.02–0.05 times/(unit·month), and the overall fault frequency is low. (4) The fault statistics results of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models are consistent with the characteristics of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models. In general, there is no significant correlation between the fault frequency and the service time of underground fluid instruments. (5) The results of this paper demonstrate that the service time of underground fluid instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for whether to update the instruments. Similarly, the fault frequency of the instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for the service life of the instruments in the process of formulating the service life standards of underground fluid instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46398,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation analysis between fault frequency and service time of underground fluid instruments\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Tian,&nbsp;Guoying Su\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geog.2022.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we make a statistical analysis of the fault information of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models in China from January 2021 to May 2022 based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, and compare the fault statistics of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models during the study period. The results show that: (1) The numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are basically positively correlated with the numbers of the corresponding instruments, with good consistency. Moreover, the automatic observation instruments (8 models) with more than 30 units are significantly correlated at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level). Even at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level), there are 7 models (7/8) with significant correlation. (2) The positive and negative correlations between the monthly average number of faults and the corresponding service times of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are random, and there are 9 models (75%) with no significant correlation at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level), while 12 models (100%) with no significant correlation at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level). (3) The monthly average numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models are basically 0.02–0.05 times/(unit·month), and the overall fault frequency is low. (4) The fault statistics results of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models are consistent with the characteristics of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models. In general, there is no significant correlation between the fault frequency and the service time of underground fluid instruments. (5) The results of this paper demonstrate that the service time of underground fluid instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for whether to update the instruments. Similarly, the fault frequency of the instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for the service life of the instruments in the process of formulating the service life standards of underground fluid instruments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 411-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984723000137\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984723000137","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文基于Pearson相关系数对中国12个模式的地下流体仪器在2021年1月至2022年5月的故障信息进行统计分析,并对3个模式的气象三要素仪器在研究期间的故障统计量进行比较。结果表明:(1)12种不同服役年限的地下流体仪器的断层数与相应仪器的断层数基本呈正相关,一致性较好。超过30台的自动观测仪器(8个型号)在0.05的显著性水平(95%置信水平)上显著相关。即使在0.01显著性水平(99%置信水平)下,也有7个模型(7/8)具有显著相关性。(2) 12种不同使用时间的地下流体仪器月平均故障数与相应使用时间的正、负相关是随机的,有9种(75%)模型在0.05显著水平(95%置信度)下无显著相关性,有12种(100%)模型在0.01显著水平(99%置信度)下无显著相关性。(3) 12个型号地下流体仪器月平均故障次数基本在0.02 ~ 0.05次/(单位·月),总体故障频次较低。(4) 3种模式的气象三元仪器的故障统计结果与12种模式的地下流体仪器的特征一致。一般情况下,井下流体仪器的故障频率与使用时间之间没有明显的相关性。(5)本文的研究结果表明,地下流体仪器的使用时间不能作为是否更新仪器的主要原因。同样,在制定地下流体仪器使用寿命标准的过程中,也不能将仪器的故障频率作为影响仪器使用寿命的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation analysis between fault frequency and service time of underground fluid instruments

In this paper, we make a statistical analysis of the fault information of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models in China from January 2021 to May 2022 based on the Pearson correlation coefficient, and compare the fault statistics of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models during the study period. The results show that: (1) The numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are basically positively correlated with the numbers of the corresponding instruments, with good consistency. Moreover, the automatic observation instruments (8 models) with more than 30 units are significantly correlated at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level). Even at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level), there are 7 models (7/8) with significant correlation. (2) The positive and negative correlations between the monthly average number of faults and the corresponding service times of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models with different service times are random, and there are 9 models (75%) with no significant correlation at a 0.05 significance level (95% confidence level), while 12 models (100%) with no significant correlation at a 0.01 significance level (99% confidence level). (3) The monthly average numbers of faults of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models are basically 0.02–0.05 times/(unit·month), and the overall fault frequency is low. (4) The fault statistics results of the meteorological three-element instruments of 3 models are consistent with the characteristics of the underground fluid instruments of 12 models. In general, there is no significant correlation between the fault frequency and the service time of underground fluid instruments. (5) The results of this paper demonstrate that the service time of underground fluid instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for whether to update the instruments. Similarly, the fault frequency of the instruments cannot be taken as the main reason for the service life of the instruments in the process of formulating the service life standards of underground fluid instruments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Geodesy and Geodynamics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
566
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Geodesy and Geodynamics launched in October, 2010, and is a bimonthly publication. It is sponsored jointly by Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Science Press, and another six agencies. It is an international journal with a Chinese heart. Geodesy and Geodynamics is committed to the publication of quality scientific papers in English in the fields of geodesy and geodynamics from authors around the world. Its aim is to promote a combination between Geodesy and Geodynamics, deepen the application of Geodesy in the field of Geoscience and quicken worldwide fellows'' understanding on scientific research activity in China. It mainly publishes newest research achievements in the field of Geodesy, Geodynamics, Science of Disaster and so on. Aims and Scope: new theories and methods of geodesy; new results of monitoring and studying crustal movement and deformation by using geodetic theories and methods; new ways and achievements in earthquake-prediction investigation by using geodetic theories and methods; new results of crustal movement and deformation studies by using other geologic, hydrological, and geophysical theories and methods; new results of satellite gravity measurements; new development and results of space-to-ground observation technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信