放射肿瘤学家对数字患者评估平台的认识和利用。

P. Zaki, Ganesh Shenoy, J. Gou, Vijay Raj, K. Howell
{"title":"放射肿瘤学家对数字患者评估平台的认识和利用。","authors":"P. Zaki, Ganesh Shenoy, J. Gou, Vijay Raj, K. Howell","doi":"10.37549/aro1252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nPatient engagement is increasing in the presence of digital patient assessment platforms, or physician rating websites. Despite this rapid growth, data remains insufficient regarding how these evaluations impact radiation oncologists.\n\n\nObjectives\nThe purpose of this study was to assess radiation oncologists worldwide on their awareness and noted effects of digital patient assessment platforms.\n\n\nMethods\nAn electronic survey was delivered to 6,199 members of the American Society of Radiation Oncology. Subjects were radiation oncologists practicing throughout the world. The survey consisted of 14 questions focused on demographics, practice details, patient volume, institutional utilization of patient reviews, and perceptions of radiation oncologists on health care reviews provided by patients.\n\n\nResults\nThere were 447 responses from practicing radiation oncologists in total, 321 (72%) of which are in the US. Most respondents (228; 51%) either agreed or strongly agreed that patients consider online reviews when deciding which physician to visit. Of all respondents, 188 (42%) reported that their institution checks their online feedback, whereas 157 (36%) and 99 (22%) respectively reported not knowing, or to their knowledge their institution does not check their online feedback. Respondents who saw more than the average number of consults per week were significantly more likely to receive negative feedback (P = 0.005). Forty-five percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that online virtual assessment tools contribute to physician burnout. Respondents (100; 22%) who received inappropriate or misdirected feedback were significantly more likely to report that virtual reviews contribute to burnout (P = 0.001).\n\n\nConclusions\nRadiation oncologists need to be aware that self-reported patient assessments are a data point in the quality of a physician and health care establishment. To best ensure appropriate feedback of a physician's capabilities as a doctor, leadership and employee alignment for patient experience are now more important than ever.","PeriodicalId":72265,"journal":{"name":"Applied radiation oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation Oncologist Perceptions and Utilization of Digital Patient Assessment Platforms.\",\"authors\":\"P. Zaki, Ganesh Shenoy, J. Gou, Vijay Raj, K. Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.37549/aro1252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nPatient engagement is increasing in the presence of digital patient assessment platforms, or physician rating websites. Despite this rapid growth, data remains insufficient regarding how these evaluations impact radiation oncologists.\\n\\n\\nObjectives\\nThe purpose of this study was to assess radiation oncologists worldwide on their awareness and noted effects of digital patient assessment platforms.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nAn electronic survey was delivered to 6,199 members of the American Society of Radiation Oncology. Subjects were radiation oncologists practicing throughout the world. The survey consisted of 14 questions focused on demographics, practice details, patient volume, institutional utilization of patient reviews, and perceptions of radiation oncologists on health care reviews provided by patients.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nThere were 447 responses from practicing radiation oncologists in total, 321 (72%) of which are in the US. Most respondents (228; 51%) either agreed or strongly agreed that patients consider online reviews when deciding which physician to visit. Of all respondents, 188 (42%) reported that their institution checks their online feedback, whereas 157 (36%) and 99 (22%) respectively reported not knowing, or to their knowledge their institution does not check their online feedback. Respondents who saw more than the average number of consults per week were significantly more likely to receive negative feedback (P = 0.005). Forty-five percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that online virtual assessment tools contribute to physician burnout. Respondents (100; 22%) who received inappropriate or misdirected feedback were significantly more likely to report that virtual reviews contribute to burnout (P = 0.001).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nRadiation oncologists need to be aware that self-reported patient assessments are a data point in the quality of a physician and health care establishment. To best ensure appropriate feedback of a physician's capabilities as a doctor, leadership and employee alignment for patient experience are now more important than ever.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied radiation oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied radiation oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37549/aro1252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied radiation oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37549/aro1252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景随着数字患者评估平台或医生评级网站的出现,患者参与度正在提高。尽管增长迅速,但关于这些评估如何影响放射肿瘤学家的数据仍然不足。目的本研究的目的是评估世界各地的放射肿瘤学家对数字患者评估平台的认识和注意到的效果。方法对6199名美国放射肿瘤学会成员进行电子调查。受试者是在世界各地执业的放射肿瘤学家。该调查由14个问题组成,重点关注人口统计、实践细节、患者数量、机构对患者审查的利用,以及放射肿瘤学家对患者提供的医疗保健审查的看法。结果共有447份来自执业放射肿瘤学家的回复,其中321份(72%)在美国。大多数受访者(228份;51%)同意或强烈同意患者在决定就诊时考虑在线审查。在所有受访者中,188人(42%)表示他们的机构会检查他们的在线反馈,而157人(36%)和99人(22%)分别表示不知道,或者据他们所知,他们的机构不会检查他们的网络反馈。每周咨询次数超过平均水平的受访者更有可能收到负面反馈(P=0.005)。45%的受访者同意或强烈同意在线虚拟评估工具会导致医生倦怠。收到不恰当或误导性反馈的受访者(100;22%)更有可能报告虚拟评论会导致倦怠(P=0.001)。结论放射肿瘤学家需要意识到,自我报告的患者评估是医生和医疗机构质量的一个数据点。为了最好地确保医生作为医生的能力得到适当的反馈,领导力和员工对患者体验的一致性现在比以往任何时候都更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation Oncologist Perceptions and Utilization of Digital Patient Assessment Platforms.
Background Patient engagement is increasing in the presence of digital patient assessment platforms, or physician rating websites. Despite this rapid growth, data remains insufficient regarding how these evaluations impact radiation oncologists. Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess radiation oncologists worldwide on their awareness and noted effects of digital patient assessment platforms. Methods An electronic survey was delivered to 6,199 members of the American Society of Radiation Oncology. Subjects were radiation oncologists practicing throughout the world. The survey consisted of 14 questions focused on demographics, practice details, patient volume, institutional utilization of patient reviews, and perceptions of radiation oncologists on health care reviews provided by patients. Results There were 447 responses from practicing radiation oncologists in total, 321 (72%) of which are in the US. Most respondents (228; 51%) either agreed or strongly agreed that patients consider online reviews when deciding which physician to visit. Of all respondents, 188 (42%) reported that their institution checks their online feedback, whereas 157 (36%) and 99 (22%) respectively reported not knowing, or to their knowledge their institution does not check their online feedback. Respondents who saw more than the average number of consults per week were significantly more likely to receive negative feedback (P = 0.005). Forty-five percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that online virtual assessment tools contribute to physician burnout. Respondents (100; 22%) who received inappropriate or misdirected feedback were significantly more likely to report that virtual reviews contribute to burnout (P = 0.001). Conclusions Radiation oncologists need to be aware that self-reported patient assessments are a data point in the quality of a physician and health care establishment. To best ensure appropriate feedback of a physician's capabilities as a doctor, leadership and employee alignment for patient experience are now more important than ever.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信