一项初步研究探讨了在法医精神病学样本的攻击支持信念的性质

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
I. Sebalo, L. M. B. Steene, Lisa Gaylor, J. Ireland
{"title":"一项初步研究探讨了在法医精神病学样本的攻击支持信念的性质","authors":"I. Sebalo, L. M. B. Steene, Lisa Gaylor, J. Ireland","doi":"10.1108/jcp-11-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis preliminary study aims to investigate and describe aggression-supportive normative beliefs among patients of a high-secure hospital.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTherapy data from a sample of high-secure forensic hospital patients (N = 11) who had participated in Life Minus Violence-Enhanced, a long-term violence therapy, was examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). During therapy, cognitions linked to past incidences of aggression were explored using aggression choice chains.\n\n\nFindings\nIPA was applied to data generated through this process to examine the presence and nature of normative beliefs reported, identifying seven themes: rules for aggressive behaviour; use of violence to obtain revenge; processing emotions with violence; surviving in a threatening world; do not become a victim; using violence to maintain status; and prosocial beliefs.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFindings demonstrate that forensic patients have specific aggression-supportive normative beliefs, which may be malleable. Limitations and implications are discussed.\n","PeriodicalId":44013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A preliminary study exploring the nature of aggression supportive beliefs in a forensic psychiatric sample\",\"authors\":\"I. Sebalo, L. M. B. Steene, Lisa Gaylor, J. Ireland\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcp-11-2022-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis preliminary study aims to investigate and describe aggression-supportive normative beliefs among patients of a high-secure hospital.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTherapy data from a sample of high-secure forensic hospital patients (N = 11) who had participated in Life Minus Violence-Enhanced, a long-term violence therapy, was examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). During therapy, cognitions linked to past incidences of aggression were explored using aggression choice chains.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIPA was applied to data generated through this process to examine the presence and nature of normative beliefs reported, identifying seven themes: rules for aggressive behaviour; use of violence to obtain revenge; processing emotions with violence; surviving in a threatening world; do not become a victim; using violence to maintain status; and prosocial beliefs.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nFindings demonstrate that forensic patients have specific aggression-supportive normative beliefs, which may be malleable. Limitations and implications are discussed.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-11-2022-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-11-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本初步研究旨在调查和描述一家高度安全医院患者的攻击性支持性规范信念。设计/方法/方法使用解释性现象学分析(IPA)对来自高度安全的法医医院患者样本(N=11)的治疗数据进行了检查,这些患者参与了长期暴力治疗“减命暴力强化”。在治疗过程中,使用攻击选择链来探索与过去攻击发生率相关的认知。将调查结果IPA应用于通过这一过程生成的数据,以检查所报告的规范信念的存在和性质,确定了七个主题:攻击行为规则;使用暴力进行报复;用暴力处理情绪;在一个充满威胁的世界中生存;不要成为受害者;使用暴力维持地位;以及亲社会信仰。原创性/价值研究结果表明,法医患者具有特定的攻击性支持性规范信念,这种信念可能具有可塑性。讨论了限制和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A preliminary study exploring the nature of aggression supportive beliefs in a forensic psychiatric sample
Purpose This preliminary study aims to investigate and describe aggression-supportive normative beliefs among patients of a high-secure hospital. Design/methodology/approach Therapy data from a sample of high-secure forensic hospital patients (N = 11) who had participated in Life Minus Violence-Enhanced, a long-term violence therapy, was examined using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). During therapy, cognitions linked to past incidences of aggression were explored using aggression choice chains. Findings IPA was applied to data generated through this process to examine the presence and nature of normative beliefs reported, identifying seven themes: rules for aggressive behaviour; use of violence to obtain revenge; processing emotions with violence; surviving in a threatening world; do not become a victim; using violence to maintain status; and prosocial beliefs. Originality/value Findings demonstrate that forensic patients have specific aggression-supportive normative beliefs, which may be malleable. Limitations and implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Journal of Criminal Psychology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信