对不可能

History of the present (Champaign, Ill.) Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1215/21599785-9015315

Nasrin Olla

{"title":"对不可能","authors":"Nasrin Olla","doi":"10.1215/21599785-9015315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Should critical traditions value transparency, surface effects, and a realist attitude? Does the frame of realism help us recognize, narrate, and understand histories marked by erasure? This article analyzes Denise Riley’s 1988 book “Am I That Name?” alongside Gayatri Spivak’s essay of the same year, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and argues that a stubbornly realist gaze remains blind to the enduring questions of feminist and postcolonial thought.","PeriodicalId":90843,"journal":{"name":"History of the present (Champaign, Ill.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Impossibility\",\"authors\":\"Nasrin Olla\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/21599785-9015315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Should critical traditions value transparency, surface effects, and a realist attitude? Does the frame of realism help us recognize, narrate, and understand histories marked by erasure? This article analyzes Denise Riley’s 1988 book “Am I That Name?” alongside Gayatri Spivak’s essay of the same year, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and argues that a stubbornly realist gaze remains blind to the enduring questions of feminist and postcolonial thought.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of the present (Champaign, Ill.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of the present (Champaign, Ill.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/21599785-9015315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the present (Champaign, Ill.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/21599785-9015315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

批判传统是否应该重视透明度、表面效果和现实主义态度？现实主义的框架是否有助于我们认识、叙述和理解被抹去的历史？本文分析了Denise Riley 1988年出版的《我是那个名字吗？》一书，以及Gayatri Spivak同年的文章《Subaltern能说话吗？》，并认为顽固的现实主义凝视仍然对女权主义和后殖民思想的持久问题视而不见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On Impossibility

Should critical traditions value transparency, surface effects, and a realist attitude? Does the frame of realism help us recognize, narrate, and understand histories marked by erasure? This article analyzes Denise Riley’s 1988 book “Am I That Name?” alongside Gayatri Spivak’s essay of the same year, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and argues that a stubbornly realist gaze remains blind to the enduring questions of feminist and postcolonial thought.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

History of the present (Champaign, Ill.)

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量