遗产研究的现状与未来:从“复古乌托邦”到“前瞻”

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Laure Fournier
{"title":"遗产研究的现状与未来:从“复古乌托邦”到“前瞻”","authors":"Laure Fournier","doi":"10.3986/traditio2021500103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the author starts from the different approaches between heritage studies on the one hand and disciplinary heritage approaches on the other hand to consider current and future developments in the field of intangible cultural heritage. In the play between critical studies and broader studies, there are risks of regression as well as opportunities for progress. To underpin his analysis, he refers to his experience of development processes in the field of cultural heritage and to some recent research in France on the institutional functioning of UNESCO in the field of intangible cultural heritage. He then focuses on the notions of “retrotopia” (Bauman, 2017) and “prospective” (Godet, 2004), which seem to him to be suitable for triggering a fundamental anthropological reflection on the future of cultural heritage research. At the end, he draws some conclusions about the possibilities of progress – or, conversely, regression – in intangible cultural heritage.","PeriodicalId":35228,"journal":{"name":"Traditiones","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current and Future Developments in Heritage Studies: From “Retrotopia” to “Prospective”\",\"authors\":\"Laure Fournier\",\"doi\":\"10.3986/traditio2021500103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the article, the author starts from the different approaches between heritage studies on the one hand and disciplinary heritage approaches on the other hand to consider current and future developments in the field of intangible cultural heritage. In the play between critical studies and broader studies, there are risks of regression as well as opportunities for progress. To underpin his analysis, he refers to his experience of development processes in the field of cultural heritage and to some recent research in France on the institutional functioning of UNESCO in the field of intangible cultural heritage. He then focuses on the notions of “retrotopia” (Bauman, 2017) and “prospective” (Godet, 2004), which seem to him to be suitable for triggering a fundamental anthropological reflection on the future of cultural heritage research. At the end, he draws some conclusions about the possibilities of progress – or, conversely, regression – in intangible cultural heritage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traditiones\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traditiones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3986/traditio2021500103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditiones","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/traditio2021500103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,笔者从遗产研究与学科遗产研究的不同路径入手,思考非物质文化遗产领域的现状与未来发展。在批判性研究和更广泛的研究之间的博弈中,既有倒退的风险,也有进步的机会。为了支持他的分析,他提到了他在文化遗产领域的发展过程中的经验,以及最近在法国对联合国教科文组织在非物质文化遗产领域的机构运作进行的一些研究。然后,他将重点放在“复古乌托邦”(Bauman, 2017)和“前瞻性”(Godet, 2004)的概念上,在他看来,这似乎适合引发对文化遗产研究未来的基本人类学反思。最后,他就非物质文化遗产的进步或倒退的可能性得出了一些结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current and Future Developments in Heritage Studies: From “Retrotopia” to “Prospective”
In the article, the author starts from the different approaches between heritage studies on the one hand and disciplinary heritage approaches on the other hand to consider current and future developments in the field of intangible cultural heritage. In the play between critical studies and broader studies, there are risks of regression as well as opportunities for progress. To underpin his analysis, he refers to his experience of development processes in the field of cultural heritage and to some recent research in France on the institutional functioning of UNESCO in the field of intangible cultural heritage. He then focuses on the notions of “retrotopia” (Bauman, 2017) and “prospective” (Godet, 2004), which seem to him to be suitable for triggering a fundamental anthropological reflection on the future of cultural heritage research. At the end, he draws some conclusions about the possibilities of progress – or, conversely, regression – in intangible cultural heritage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traditiones
Traditiones Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信