后者与福利国家的未来——矛盾政治的掩盖

M. Laufenberg
{"title":"后者与福利国家的未来——矛盾政治的掩盖","authors":"M. Laufenberg","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the face of a global crisis of social reproduction, welfare states have consistently failed to produce social security for the majority of the world’s population. In this context, collective and grassroots practices of radical care have gained meaning as non-state strategies for enduring an unequal and insecure world. Through the lens of welfare state theory, this paper explores both the emancipatory potentials as well as the structural limits and pitfalls of radical care. Its focus lies in contemporary socio-material articulations of communities of care/‘care-citizenship’ and their paradoxical relations with the welfare state. This paper seeks to avoid the reductive dichotomy of communities of care vs. the state that it identifies in the approach taken by many protagonists as well as critics of radical care. To this end, it conceptualizes a paradoxical politics of care-citizenship that is not radically opposed to but rather is engaged in a strategic tension with state institutions, a means of contributing to a democratic and solidary renewal of the welfare state from below.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"13 1","pages":"99-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radical Care und die Zukunft des Wohlfahrtstaats: Konturen einer paradoxen Politik der Sorge\",\"authors\":\"M. Laufenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the face of a global crisis of social reproduction, welfare states have consistently failed to produce social security for the majority of the world’s population. In this context, collective and grassroots practices of radical care have gained meaning as non-state strategies for enduring an unequal and insecure world. Through the lens of welfare state theory, this paper explores both the emancipatory potentials as well as the structural limits and pitfalls of radical care. Its focus lies in contemporary socio-material articulations of communities of care/‘care-citizenship’ and their paradoxical relations with the welfare state. This paper seeks to avoid the reductive dichotomy of communities of care vs. the state that it identifies in the approach taken by many protagonists as well as critics of radical care. To this end, it conceptualizes a paradoxical politics of care-citizenship that is not radically opposed to but rather is engaged in a strategic tension with state institutions, a means of contributing to a democratic and solidary renewal of the welfare state from below.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"99-120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2020.13.2.1048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

面对全球社会再生产危机,福利国家一直未能为世界上大多数人口提供社会保障。在这种背景下,集体和基层的激进护理实践作为一种非国家战略,在一个不平等和不安全的世界中获得了意义。通过福利国家理论的视角,本文探讨了激进护理的解放潜力以及结构性限制和陷阱。它的重点在于当代社会物质对关爱社区/“关爱公民”的阐述,以及它们与福利国家的矛盾关系。本文试图避免在许多激进护理的倡导者和批评者所采取的方法中,护理社区与它所确定的国家之间的简化二分法。为此,它将一种矛盾的关爱公民政治概念化,这种政治并不是从根本上反对,而是与国家机构处于战略紧张关系中,这是一种从底层促进福利国家民主和团结复兴的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radical Care und die Zukunft des Wohlfahrtstaats: Konturen einer paradoxen Politik der Sorge
In the face of a global crisis of social reproduction, welfare states have consistently failed to produce social security for the majority of the world’s population. In this context, collective and grassroots practices of radical care have gained meaning as non-state strategies for enduring an unequal and insecure world. Through the lens of welfare state theory, this paper explores both the emancipatory potentials as well as the structural limits and pitfalls of radical care. Its focus lies in contemporary socio-material articulations of communities of care/‘care-citizenship’ and their paradoxical relations with the welfare state. This paper seeks to avoid the reductive dichotomy of communities of care vs. the state that it identifies in the approach taken by many protagonists as well as critics of radical care. To this end, it conceptualizes a paradoxical politics of care-citizenship that is not radically opposed to but rather is engaged in a strategic tension with state institutions, a means of contributing to a democratic and solidary renewal of the welfare state from below.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信