板栗小枝种子再生评估:一种方法学方法

M. Manetti, C. Becagli, F. Pelleri, G. Pezzatti, M. Pividori, M. Conedera, Enrico Marcolin
{"title":"板栗小枝种子再生评估:一种方法学方法","authors":"M. Manetti, C. Becagli, F. Pelleri, G. Pezzatti, M. Pividori, M. Conedera, Enrico Marcolin","doi":"10.12899/ASR-1670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decades, the abandonment of the traditional management due to many adverse factors caused a general aging of chestnut coppices; this led to an increased mortality of the chestnut stools and a consequent replacement with the entry of other species. Preservation and improvement of the chestnut coppice emphasize the importance of natural regeneration for future forest management: seed regeneration contributes to provide new stools for future coppice generations and promotes a proper development of the stand in terms of specific and structural diversity. In this study, we propose a method for investigating the relationship between density, diversity, development of natural regeneration and possible driving forces in terms of site conditions and stand parameters. At this purpose, a survey based on mixed sampling plots was conducted in different coppice systems (simple coppice, coppice with standards), 4÷8 years after the coppicing: measurements on stools, shoots and standards, as well as seed regeneration were carried out. Chestnut seed regeneration was characterized by taller individuals in simple coppice plots, even though the seedlings were fewer than those in coppice with standards treatment. Canopy cover and amount of standards, density of stools and resprouting shoots negatively influenced the establishment of chestnut seed regeneration: likewise, within the same treatment, plots with greater site index promoted the development of chestnut regeneration. The proposed methods allowed a characterization of the dynamics related to the natural regeneration of classical chestnut coppice systems, identifying the main controlling factors. Among them, factors modifiable by management, such as stand structure and amount of standards, offer forest managers multiple silvicultural options to control seed regeneration processes.","PeriodicalId":37733,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"85-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing seed regeneration in chestnut coppices: a methodological approach\",\"authors\":\"M. Manetti, C. Becagli, F. Pelleri, G. Pezzatti, M. Pividori, M. Conedera, Enrico Marcolin\",\"doi\":\"10.12899/ASR-1670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last decades, the abandonment of the traditional management due to many adverse factors caused a general aging of chestnut coppices; this led to an increased mortality of the chestnut stools and a consequent replacement with the entry of other species. Preservation and improvement of the chestnut coppice emphasize the importance of natural regeneration for future forest management: seed regeneration contributes to provide new stools for future coppice generations and promotes a proper development of the stand in terms of specific and structural diversity. In this study, we propose a method for investigating the relationship between density, diversity, development of natural regeneration and possible driving forces in terms of site conditions and stand parameters. At this purpose, a survey based on mixed sampling plots was conducted in different coppice systems (simple coppice, coppice with standards), 4÷8 years after the coppicing: measurements on stools, shoots and standards, as well as seed regeneration were carried out. Chestnut seed regeneration was characterized by taller individuals in simple coppice plots, even though the seedlings were fewer than those in coppice with standards treatment. Canopy cover and amount of standards, density of stools and resprouting shoots negatively influenced the establishment of chestnut seed regeneration: likewise, within the same treatment, plots with greater site index promoted the development of chestnut regeneration. The proposed methods allowed a characterization of the dynamics related to the natural regeneration of classical chestnut coppice systems, identifying the main controlling factors. Among them, factors modifiable by management, such as stand structure and amount of standards, offer forest managers multiple silvicultural options to control seed regeneration processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Silvicultural Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"85-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Silvicultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12899/ASR-1670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12899/ASR-1670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近几十年来,由于诸多不利因素的影响,传统的管理方式被抛弃,导致板栗普遍老化;这导致栗子粪便的死亡率增加,随之而来的是其他物种的进入。栗树林的保护和改善强调了自然更新对未来森林管理的重要性:种子更新有助于为未来的乔木世代提供新的粪便,并促进林分在特定和结构多样性方面的适当发展。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种方法来调查密度、多样性、自然更新的发展和可能的驱动因素在立地条件和林分参数的关系。为此,在不同的灌木林系统(简单灌木林、带标准灌木林)中进行了混合采样,在灌木林覆膜4÷8年后进行了测量,测量了粪便、芽和标准以及种子再生情况。栗子种子再生的特点是,在简单的乔木样地,尽管幼苗数量少于标准处理的乔木样地。冠层盖度、标准苗数量、粪便密度和再生芽密度对板栗种子再生的建立有负向影响;同样,在相同处理下,立地指数较大的样地促进板栗种子再生的发展。所提出的方法可以表征与经典栗木系统自然再生相关的动力学,确定主要控制因素。其中,林分结构和标准数量等可通过经营方式改变的因素为森林管理者提供了多种造林选择,以控制种子更新过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing seed regeneration in chestnut coppices: a methodological approach
Over the last decades, the abandonment of the traditional management due to many adverse factors caused a general aging of chestnut coppices; this led to an increased mortality of the chestnut stools and a consequent replacement with the entry of other species. Preservation and improvement of the chestnut coppice emphasize the importance of natural regeneration for future forest management: seed regeneration contributes to provide new stools for future coppice generations and promotes a proper development of the stand in terms of specific and structural diversity. In this study, we propose a method for investigating the relationship between density, diversity, development of natural regeneration and possible driving forces in terms of site conditions and stand parameters. At this purpose, a survey based on mixed sampling plots was conducted in different coppice systems (simple coppice, coppice with standards), 4÷8 years after the coppicing: measurements on stools, shoots and standards, as well as seed regeneration were carried out. Chestnut seed regeneration was characterized by taller individuals in simple coppice plots, even though the seedlings were fewer than those in coppice with standards treatment. Canopy cover and amount of standards, density of stools and resprouting shoots negatively influenced the establishment of chestnut seed regeneration: likewise, within the same treatment, plots with greater site index promoted the development of chestnut regeneration. The proposed methods allowed a characterization of the dynamics related to the natural regeneration of classical chestnut coppice systems, identifying the main controlling factors. Among them, factors modifiable by management, such as stand structure and amount of standards, offer forest managers multiple silvicultural options to control seed regeneration processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Silvicultural Research
Annals of Silvicultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信