未经批准的预算外支出的前因:欺诈三角理论的应用

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Baba Adibura Seidu, Ebenezer Opoku-Boahen, Yaw Ndori Queku, Kwakye Boateng, Gloria Opoku-Boahen
{"title":"未经批准的预算外支出的前因:欺诈三角理论的应用","authors":"Baba Adibura Seidu, Ebenezer Opoku-Boahen, Yaw Ndori Queku, Kwakye Boateng, Gloria Opoku-Boahen","doi":"10.31920/1750-4562/2022/v17n4a14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditures continue to pose threats to achieving and sustaining fiscal stability. It has resulted in budget overruns which have contributed to the rapid growth in government spending and borrowing pushing countries down toward an unsustainable economic path. It is against these that this paper sought to critically review unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure, antecedents, and consequences. The paper applied fraud triangle theory (FTT) to conceptualise antecedents of unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure. Three factors have been identified as antecedents of extra-budgetary expenditures through a critical analysis of the fraud triangle theory. These are budgetary system failure, political economy, and community of economy. The paper sought papers from Google scholar, Google, and Scopus databases. Scopus database was used to conduct bibliometric analysis using the “Biblioshiny” function in the “bibliometrix” package subsequent to the development of the theoretical framework and manual search from Google and Google scholar to determine the depth of empirical studies on the subject. The paper proposed three propositions and a theoretical framework to guide future research. It was also revealed that unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure limits the success of fiscal consolidation. It is also deleterious to budgetary gains and savings and will adversely affect the health of economies. It also pushes an economy toward a distressing economic path through high public debts to finance such expenditures.","PeriodicalId":37165,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Business and Economic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Review of Antecedents of Unauthorised Extra-Budgetary Expenditure: Application of Fraud Triangle Theory\",\"authors\":\"Baba Adibura Seidu, Ebenezer Opoku-Boahen, Yaw Ndori Queku, Kwakye Boateng, Gloria Opoku-Boahen\",\"doi\":\"10.31920/1750-4562/2022/v17n4a14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditures continue to pose threats to achieving and sustaining fiscal stability. It has resulted in budget overruns which have contributed to the rapid growth in government spending and borrowing pushing countries down toward an unsustainable economic path. It is against these that this paper sought to critically review unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure, antecedents, and consequences. The paper applied fraud triangle theory (FTT) to conceptualise antecedents of unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure. Three factors have been identified as antecedents of extra-budgetary expenditures through a critical analysis of the fraud triangle theory. These are budgetary system failure, political economy, and community of economy. The paper sought papers from Google scholar, Google, and Scopus databases. Scopus database was used to conduct bibliometric analysis using the “Biblioshiny” function in the “bibliometrix” package subsequent to the development of the theoretical framework and manual search from Google and Google scholar to determine the depth of empirical studies on the subject. The paper proposed three propositions and a theoretical framework to guide future research. It was also revealed that unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure limits the success of fiscal consolidation. It is also deleterious to budgetary gains and savings and will adversely affect the health of economies. It also pushes an economy toward a distressing economic path through high public debts to finance such expenditures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Business and Economic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Business and Economic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2022/v17n4a14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Business and Economic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2022/v17n4a14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

未经批准的预算外支出继续对实现和维持财政稳定构成威胁。它导致预算超支,导致政府支出和借贷迅速增长,将各国推向不可持续的经济道路。正是针对这些,本文试图批判性地审查未经授权的预算外支出、前因后果。本文运用欺诈三角理论对未经批准的预算外支出的前因进行了概念化。通过对欺诈三角理论的批判性分析,确定了三个因素作为预算外支出的先决条件。它们分别是预算制度失灵、政治经济学和社会经济学。论文从谷歌scholar、谷歌和Scopus数据库中检索论文。在建立理论框架后,通过谷歌和谷歌学者的人工检索,利用Scopus数据库中的“Biblioshiny”功能对该课题进行文献计量分析,以确定该课题的实证研究深度。本文提出了三个命题和理论框架来指导未来的研究。报告还显示,未经批准的预算外支出限制了财政整顿的成功。它还有害于预算收益和储蓄,并将对经济的健康产生不利影响。它还会通过高额公共债务为此类支出提供资金,将经济推向一条令人痛苦的经济道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Critical Review of Antecedents of Unauthorised Extra-Budgetary Expenditure: Application of Fraud Triangle Theory
Unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditures continue to pose threats to achieving and sustaining fiscal stability. It has resulted in budget overruns which have contributed to the rapid growth in government spending and borrowing pushing countries down toward an unsustainable economic path. It is against these that this paper sought to critically review unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure, antecedents, and consequences. The paper applied fraud triangle theory (FTT) to conceptualise antecedents of unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure. Three factors have been identified as antecedents of extra-budgetary expenditures through a critical analysis of the fraud triangle theory. These are budgetary system failure, political economy, and community of economy. The paper sought papers from Google scholar, Google, and Scopus databases. Scopus database was used to conduct bibliometric analysis using the “Biblioshiny” function in the “bibliometrix” package subsequent to the development of the theoretical framework and manual search from Google and Google scholar to determine the depth of empirical studies on the subject. The paper proposed three propositions and a theoretical framework to guide future research. It was also revealed that unauthorised extra-budgetary expenditure limits the success of fiscal consolidation. It is also deleterious to budgetary gains and savings and will adversely affect the health of economies. It also pushes an economy toward a distressing economic path through high public debts to finance such expenditures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Business and Economic Research
African Journal of Business and Economic Research Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信