民主与环境质量:传播渠道的核算

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
KINDA SOMLANARE ROMUALD
{"title":"民主与环境质量:传播渠道的核算","authors":"KINDA SOMLANARE ROMUALD","doi":"10.35866/CAUJED.2019.44.2.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper contributes to the controversial literature on democratic institutions and environmental quality. Despite an extensive literature, studies have not focused on the transmission channels by which democracy affect environmental quality. Using panel data from 1960 to 2008 in 122 developed and developing countries, results are as follows: First democratic institutions have opposite effects on environmental quality: a positive and direct effect on environmental quality and a negative indirect effect through domestic investments and income inequality. Second, the positive effect of democracy on environmental quality is higher in developed countries than in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":15602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEMOCRACY AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSMISSION CHANNELS\",\"authors\":\"KINDA SOMLANARE ROMUALD\",\"doi\":\"10.35866/CAUJED.2019.44.2.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper contributes to the controversial literature on democratic institutions and environmental quality. Despite an extensive literature, studies have not focused on the transmission channels by which democracy affect environmental quality. Using panel data from 1960 to 2008 in 122 developed and developing countries, results are as follows: First democratic institutions have opposite effects on environmental quality: a positive and direct effect on environmental quality and a negative indirect effect through domestic investments and income inequality. Second, the positive effect of democracy on environmental quality is higher in developed countries than in developing countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2019.44.2.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2019.44.2.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇论文对民主制度和环境质量的有争议的文献有所贡献。尽管有大量的文献,但研究并没有集中在民主影响环境质量的传播渠道上。利用1960年至2008年122个发达国家和发展中国家的面板数据,结果如下:首先,民主制度对环境质量有相反的影响:对环境质量有积极和直接的影响,通过国内投资和收入不平等对环境质量有消极的间接影响。其次,民主对环境质量的积极影响在发达国家高于发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEMOCRACY AND ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: ACCOUNTING FOR TRANSMISSION CHANNELS
This paper contributes to the controversial literature on democratic institutions and environmental quality. Despite an extensive literature, studies have not focused on the transmission channels by which democracy affect environmental quality. Using panel data from 1960 to 2008 in 122 developed and developing countries, results are as follows: First democratic institutions have opposite effects on environmental quality: a positive and direct effect on environmental quality and a negative indirect effect through domestic investments and income inequality. Second, the positive effect of democracy on environmental quality is higher in developed countries than in developing countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of economic development
Journal of economic development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Development (JED) promotes and encourages research that aim at economic development and growth by publishing papers of great scholarly merit on a wide range of topics and employing a wide range of approaches. JED welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers in the fields of economic development, economic growth, international trade and finance, labor economics, IO, social choice and political economics. JED also invites the economic analysis on the experiences of economic development in various dimensions from all the countries of the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信