《解放之国:冷战时期德国的同性恋者在独裁与民主之间》塞缪尔·克劳斯·胡内克著(书评)

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Christopher Ewing
{"title":"《解放之国:冷战时期德国的同性恋者在独裁与民主之间》塞缪尔·克劳斯·胡内克著(书评)","authors":"Christopher Ewing","doi":"10.1093/jsh/shac054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite gay liberation’s close associations with political leftism, historians have long debated whether or not political liberation is indebted to the proliferation of consumer choice in liberal capitalist democracies. Answering this question often involves making a simultaneous claim about the political merits of capitalism, and the apparent greyness of rainbow life under state socialism can put leftleaning historians in an uncomfortable position. Samuel Clowes Huneke’s comparative look at gay life in postwar Germany, divided between a liberal capitalist West and a state socialist East, offers a unique opportunity to think through this history in more complicated ways that will resonate in many national contexts. Huneke advances a set of three, interlinking arguments: 1) homophobia is a more malleable concept than previously understood, 2) gay liberation is historically contingent and not wedded to consumer capitalism, and 3) a focus on gay men unsettles the assumption of a West German, capitalist success story. In so doing, Huneke is elegantly able to “weave together and to compare the trajectories of male homosexuality in the two German states across the span of forty years”—an ambitious project which constitutes his primary intervention (5). Due to the scope of his project, Huneke marshals a diverse set of sources. Most notable are the many oral history interviews that Huneke conducted, with leading gay and lesbian activists, the only democratically elected prime minister of the GDR, and anonymized individuals who experienced gay life and attendant repression in both states. These testimonies fill in gaps left in the written record, which here includes documents from state and regional archives, the East German secret police, and gay activist organizations. This range allows Huneke to engage in both historical scholarship on Germany as well as in European and US queer historiography. Huneke’s project therefore follows recent works in queer German history, including those of Benno Gammerl, Craig Griffiths, and Laurie Marhoefer, among many others, in interrogating reductive narratives that still haunt the field and engaging in international scholarship to do so. The book is organized into nine, thematically-oriented chapters, which also progress chronologically, alternating in focus between East and West Germany. The first chapter offers an overview of queer life in the first half of the twentieth","PeriodicalId":47169,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"States of Liberation: Gay Men Between Dictatorship and Democracy in Cold War Germany by Samuel Clowes Huneke (review)\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Ewing\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsh/shac054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite gay liberation’s close associations with political leftism, historians have long debated whether or not political liberation is indebted to the proliferation of consumer choice in liberal capitalist democracies. Answering this question often involves making a simultaneous claim about the political merits of capitalism, and the apparent greyness of rainbow life under state socialism can put leftleaning historians in an uncomfortable position. Samuel Clowes Huneke’s comparative look at gay life in postwar Germany, divided between a liberal capitalist West and a state socialist East, offers a unique opportunity to think through this history in more complicated ways that will resonate in many national contexts. Huneke advances a set of three, interlinking arguments: 1) homophobia is a more malleable concept than previously understood, 2) gay liberation is historically contingent and not wedded to consumer capitalism, and 3) a focus on gay men unsettles the assumption of a West German, capitalist success story. In so doing, Huneke is elegantly able to “weave together and to compare the trajectories of male homosexuality in the two German states across the span of forty years”—an ambitious project which constitutes his primary intervention (5). Due to the scope of his project, Huneke marshals a diverse set of sources. Most notable are the many oral history interviews that Huneke conducted, with leading gay and lesbian activists, the only democratically elected prime minister of the GDR, and anonymized individuals who experienced gay life and attendant repression in both states. These testimonies fill in gaps left in the written record, which here includes documents from state and regional archives, the East German secret police, and gay activist organizations. This range allows Huneke to engage in both historical scholarship on Germany as well as in European and US queer historiography. Huneke’s project therefore follows recent works in queer German history, including those of Benno Gammerl, Craig Griffiths, and Laurie Marhoefer, among many others, in interrogating reductive narratives that still haunt the field and engaging in international scholarship to do so. The book is organized into nine, thematically-oriented chapters, which also progress chronologically, alternating in focus between East and West Germany. The first chapter offers an overview of queer life in the first half of the twentieth\",\"PeriodicalId\":47169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shac054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管同性恋解放运动与政治左派有着密切的联系,但历史学家长期以来一直在争论,政治解放是否得益于自由资本主义民主国家消费者选择的激增。要回答这个问题,往往需要同时宣称资本主义的政治优点,而国家社会主义制度下彩虹生活的明显灰暗,可能会让左倾的历史学家感到不安。塞缪尔·克劳斯·胡内克(Samuel Clowes Huneke)对战后德国同性恋生活的比较研究,提供了一个独特的机会,以更复杂的方式思考这段历史,这将在许多国家背景下产生共鸣。战后德国分为自由资本主义的西方和国家社会主义的东方。Huneke提出了三个相互关联的论点:1)同性恋恐惧症是一个比以前理解的更有可塑性的概念;2)同性恋解放在历史上是偶然的,与消费资本主义无关;3)对同性恋男性的关注动摇了西德资本主义成功故事的假设。在这样做的过程中,Huneke能够优雅地“将两个德国州的男同性恋轨迹编织在一起并进行比较”——这是一个雄心勃勃的项目,构成了他的主要干预(5)。由于他的项目的范围,Huneke汇集了各种各样的资源。最值得注意的是Huneke进行的许多口述历史采访,采访对象包括主要的同性恋活动家,民主德国唯一的民主选举总理,以及在两个国家经历过同性恋生活和随之而来的镇压的匿名个人。这些证词填补了书面记录的空白,这些书面记录包括来自国家和地区档案馆、东德秘密警察和同性恋活动组织的文件。这一范围使得Huneke既可以从事德国的历史研究,也可以从事欧洲和美国的酷儿史学研究。因此,Huneke的项目遵循了最近在德国酷儿史上的作品,包括Benno Gammerl, Craig Griffiths和Laurie Marhoefer等人的作品,在质疑仍然困扰着该领域的还原叙事,并参与国际学术研究。全书分为九个以主题为导向的章节,这些章节也按时间顺序进行,重点在东德和西德之间交替进行。第一章概述了二十世纪上半叶的酷儿生活
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
States of Liberation: Gay Men Between Dictatorship and Democracy in Cold War Germany by Samuel Clowes Huneke (review)
Despite gay liberation’s close associations with political leftism, historians have long debated whether or not political liberation is indebted to the proliferation of consumer choice in liberal capitalist democracies. Answering this question often involves making a simultaneous claim about the political merits of capitalism, and the apparent greyness of rainbow life under state socialism can put leftleaning historians in an uncomfortable position. Samuel Clowes Huneke’s comparative look at gay life in postwar Germany, divided between a liberal capitalist West and a state socialist East, offers a unique opportunity to think through this history in more complicated ways that will resonate in many national contexts. Huneke advances a set of three, interlinking arguments: 1) homophobia is a more malleable concept than previously understood, 2) gay liberation is historically contingent and not wedded to consumer capitalism, and 3) a focus on gay men unsettles the assumption of a West German, capitalist success story. In so doing, Huneke is elegantly able to “weave together and to compare the trajectories of male homosexuality in the two German states across the span of forty years”—an ambitious project which constitutes his primary intervention (5). Due to the scope of his project, Huneke marshals a diverse set of sources. Most notable are the many oral history interviews that Huneke conducted, with leading gay and lesbian activists, the only democratically elected prime minister of the GDR, and anonymized individuals who experienced gay life and attendant repression in both states. These testimonies fill in gaps left in the written record, which here includes documents from state and regional archives, the East German secret police, and gay activist organizations. This range allows Huneke to engage in both historical scholarship on Germany as well as in European and US queer historiography. Huneke’s project therefore follows recent works in queer German history, including those of Benno Gammerl, Craig Griffiths, and Laurie Marhoefer, among many others, in interrogating reductive narratives that still haunt the field and engaging in international scholarship to do so. The book is organized into nine, thematically-oriented chapters, which also progress chronologically, alternating in focus between East and West Germany. The first chapter offers an overview of queer life in the first half of the twentieth
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social History was founded over 30 years ago, and has served as one of the leading outlets for work in this growing research field since its inception. The Journal publishes articles in social history from all areas and periods, and has played an important role in integrating work in Latin American, African, Asian and Russian history with sociohistorical analysis in Western Europe and the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信