秘密传播:罗森茨威格与阿伦特

Q4 Arts and Humanities
R. Zawisza
{"title":"秘密传播:罗森茨威格与阿伦特","authors":"R. Zawisza","doi":"10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text deals with the question whether Hannah Arendt was influenced by Franz Rosenzweig’s Der Stern der Erlösung (1921) before writing Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (1929). Instead of building general analogies, I studied two very specific topics – the world and birth – to demonstrate that Arendt repeated almost verbatim Rosenzweig’s entire peculiar argumentation which played the notions of God and nature against each other to combat their overwhelming power and to make room for the contingency of the world and the novelty of each birth. Facing the helplessness of a philosophy which ignored mortality, Rosenzweig cried out the lament of the finite being. Philosophy, with its predilection for totality, lost adequate proportions to reflect on life. Arendt revived this paradigmatic reorientation, but with a significant twist: for her, birth and the world meant more than God for Rosenzweig. Both thinkers projected a language between philosophy and theology, inciting the two idioms to a fruitful debate.","PeriodicalId":31050,"journal":{"name":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clandestine Transmission: Rosenzweig and Arendt\",\"authors\":\"R. Zawisza\",\"doi\":\"10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The text deals with the question whether Hannah Arendt was influenced by Franz Rosenzweig’s Der Stern der Erlösung (1921) before writing Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (1929). Instead of building general analogies, I studied two very specific topics – the world and birth – to demonstrate that Arendt repeated almost verbatim Rosenzweig’s entire peculiar argumentation which played the notions of God and nature against each other to combat their overwhelming power and to make room for the contingency of the world and the novelty of each birth. Facing the helplessness of a philosophy which ignored mortality, Rosenzweig cried out the lament of the finite being. Philosophy, with its predilection for totality, lost adequate proportions to reflect on life. Arendt revived this paradigmatic reorientation, but with a significant twist: for her, birth and the world meant more than God for Rosenzweig. Both thinkers projected a language between philosophy and theology, inciting the two idioms to a fruitful debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pspsl.2020.37.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了汉娜·阿伦特在创作《奥古斯丁的利贝斯贝格里夫》(1929年)之前是否受到弗朗茨·罗森茨威格的《埃尔松的斯特恩》(1921年)的影响。我没有建立一般的类比,而是研究了两个非常具体的主题——世界和出生——以证明阿伦特几乎逐字逐句地重复了罗森茨威格的整个独特论点,这些论点将上帝和自然的概念相互对立,以对抗其压倒性的力量,并为世界的偶然性和每个出生的新颖性腾出空间。面对无视死亡的哲学的无奈,罗森茨威格发出了有限存在的哀叹。哲学偏爱整体性,失去了足够的比例来反思生活。阿伦特恢复了这种范式的重新定位,但有一个重大的转折:对她来说,出生和世界对罗森茨威格来说不仅仅意味着上帝。两位思想家都在哲学和神学之间投射了一种语言,引发了这两个习语的富有成效的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clandestine Transmission: Rosenzweig and Arendt
The text deals with the question whether Hannah Arendt was influenced by Franz Rosenzweig’s Der Stern der Erlösung (1921) before writing Der Liebesbegriff bei Augustin (1929). Instead of building general analogies, I studied two very specific topics – the world and birth – to demonstrate that Arendt repeated almost verbatim Rosenzweig’s entire peculiar argumentation which played the notions of God and nature against each other to combat their overwhelming power and to make room for the contingency of the world and the novelty of each birth. Facing the helplessness of a philosophy which ignored mortality, Rosenzweig cried out the lament of the finite being. Philosophy, with its predilection for totality, lost adequate proportions to reflect on life. Arendt revived this paradigmatic reorientation, but with a significant twist: for her, birth and the world meant more than God for Rosenzweig. Both thinkers projected a language between philosophy and theology, inciting the two idioms to a fruitful debate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka
Poznanskie Studia Polonistyczne Seria Literacka Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信