比现实更好:陀思妥耶夫斯基的荒诞现实主义

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Aaron Closson
{"title":"比现实更好:陀思妥耶夫斯基的荒诞现实主义","authors":"Aaron Closson","doi":"10.1353/phl.2021.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.","PeriodicalId":51912,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Even Better Than the Real Thing: Dostoevsky's Absurd Realism\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Closson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/phl.2021.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:纳博科夫在他的俄罗斯文学讲座中谴责陀思妥耶夫斯基的小说不现实,过于感伤。很少有人会否认陀思妥耶夫斯基笔下的人物行为古怪、夸张,但这些特征一定要算作文学缺陷吗?我认为陀思妥耶夫斯基故意违背了他的宇宙表面上的现实主义,以说明世俗的参与是如何毁容和腐败的。他的小说以令人眼花缭乱的情节和人物形象攻击读者,引发的情感与书页上展开的变幻莫测的戏剧不相上下。这是一种吸引读者进行自我反省的策略,使陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品具有持久的道德活力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Even Better Than the Real Thing: Dostoevsky's Absurd Realism
Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信