{"title":"比现实更好:陀思妥耶夫斯基的荒诞现实主义","authors":"Aaron Closson","doi":"10.1353/phl.2021.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.","PeriodicalId":51912,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Even Better Than the Real Thing: Dostoevsky's Absurd Realism\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Closson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/phl.2021.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2021.0024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Even Better Than the Real Thing: Dostoevsky's Absurd Realism
Abstract:In his lectures on Russian literature, Vladimir Nabokov condemns Fyodor Dostoevsky's novels as unrealistic and excessively sentimental. Few would deny that Dostoevsky's characters behave erratically and with exaggerated intensity, but must these traits count as literary deficiencies? I argue that Dostoevsky deliberately violates the ostensible realism of his universe to illustrate how worldly engagement can disfigure and corrupt. Assailing readers with bewildering plots and personalities, his novels induce emotions paralleling the volatile drama unfolding on the page. It's a tactic that draws readers into self-examination and lends Dostoevsky's work enduring moral vitality.
期刊介绍:
For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.