个人护理中的伙伴关系与个性化:冲突与妥协

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
K. Rummery, J. Lawrence, Siabhainn Russell
{"title":"个人护理中的伙伴关系与个性化:冲突与妥协","authors":"K. Rummery, J. Lawrence, Siabhainn Russell","doi":"10.1017/S1474746422000525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Personalisation in social care services has become a feature of the delivery of long-term care for disabled people in many developed welfare states. Aim: Scotland has used the devolution of health and social care powers to develop a personalisation scheme (known as ‘Self-directed Support’). The authors apply a theoretical and empirical framework to understand the experience of contemporary disabled users of personalised services. Methods: The authors use a Scottish data set of six focus groups and a survey of 126 disabled people and family carers. Results: The data showed that flexible funding and the ability to provide services that cross agency boundaries were instrumental in moving towards equitable outcomes. Conclusions: Although there are clear policy and practice barriers to inter-agency working in personalised care services, the evidence suggests that it is worth investing in overcoming these barriers for disabled people and family carers.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"187 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partnership and Personalisation in Personal Care: Conflicts and Compromises\",\"authors\":\"K. Rummery, J. Lawrence, Siabhainn Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1474746422000525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Personalisation in social care services has become a feature of the delivery of long-term care for disabled people in many developed welfare states. Aim: Scotland has used the devolution of health and social care powers to develop a personalisation scheme (known as ‘Self-directed Support’). The authors apply a theoretical and empirical framework to understand the experience of contemporary disabled users of personalised services. Methods: The authors use a Scottish data set of six focus groups and a survey of 126 disabled people and family carers. Results: The data showed that flexible funding and the ability to provide services that cross agency boundaries were instrumental in moving towards equitable outcomes. Conclusions: Although there are clear policy and practice barriers to inter-agency working in personalised care services, the evidence suggests that it is worth investing in overcoming these barriers for disabled people and family carers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Policy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000525\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746422000525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:社会护理服务的个性化已经成为许多发达福利国家为残疾人提供长期护理的一个特点。目的:苏格兰利用卫生和社会护理权力的下放,制定了一项个性化计划(称为“自我指导支持”)。作者运用理论和经验的框架来理解个性化服务的当代残疾用户的经验。方法:作者使用苏格兰六个焦点小组的数据集和对126名残疾人和家庭照顾者的调查。结果:数据显示,灵活的资金和跨机构边界提供服务的能力有助于实现公平的结果。结论:尽管在个性化护理服务的机构间工作中存在明确的政策和实践障碍,但证据表明,为残疾人和家庭照顾者克服这些障碍是值得投资的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partnership and Personalisation in Personal Care: Conflicts and Compromises
Background: Personalisation in social care services has become a feature of the delivery of long-term care for disabled people in many developed welfare states. Aim: Scotland has used the devolution of health and social care powers to develop a personalisation scheme (known as ‘Self-directed Support’). The authors apply a theoretical and empirical framework to understand the experience of contemporary disabled users of personalised services. Methods: The authors use a Scottish data set of six focus groups and a survey of 126 disabled people and family carers. Results: The data showed that flexible funding and the ability to provide services that cross agency boundaries were instrumental in moving towards equitable outcomes. Conclusions: Although there are clear policy and practice barriers to inter-agency working in personalised care services, the evidence suggests that it is worth investing in overcoming these barriers for disabled people and family carers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信