成功的医疗技术需要以人为中心的关系和背景:关于药物分配系统的案例叙述

T. van der Zijpp, Shaun Cardiff, M. Nieboer, C. Nierse, Sanne Schepens, Hélène van den Nieuwenhoff, Suzanne Keizer
{"title":"成功的医疗技术需要以人为中心的关系和背景:关于药物分配系统的案例叙述","authors":"T. van der Zijpp, Shaun Cardiff, M. Nieboer, C. Nierse, Sanne Schepens, Hélène van den Nieuwenhoff, Suzanne Keizer","doi":"10.19043/ipdj.122.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Providing person-centred care with a limited workforce is a major challenge in our ageing society. While care technologies such as electronic medication-dispensing systems are a means to help older persons with chronic conditions continue living independently, few studies have explored their implementation and use from a multiple stakeholder perspective. This prompted six Dutch care organisations and a university of applied sciences to collaborate in the Living Longer @ Home practice development project. Aim: To explore the influence of medication-dispensing systems on service user self-reliance and self-determination, as well as on professional and informal carer workload, in the community setting. Methods: A total of 14 case studies were used to understand the complexity and particularity of medication-dispensing systems in community care. Case narratives were constructed by (supervised) nursing students, then collated, and critically and creatively analysed by university- and practice-based researchers. Results: The case narratives reveal that while technology can increase self-reliance and self-determination for service users, it can also raise (new) concerns about medication safety and social isolation. Even after careful medication-dispensing systems indication, introduction and implementation, carer workloads may simply be changed rather than reduced. The dyadic and triadic relationships are affected as roles and responsibilities change, and trust may need to be rebuilt. Conclusions: Working with medication-dispensing systems entails more than implementing a piece of technology. While these systems can increase the duration of safe independent living, their effect on the lifeworld of those involved also needs to be considered and prepared for. A person-centred and relationship-oriented as opposed to task-orientated approach is advisable. Implications for practice: Before the introduction of care technology, nurses should discuss its impact on service users, informal carers, themselves and the dyadic/triadic relationship Practitioners, managers and technicians should collaboratively integrate care technology into community care services (Supervised) construction of case narratives enables workplace learning and practice development","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful healthcare technology requires person-centred relationships and contexts: case narratives on medication-dispensing systems\",\"authors\":\"T. van der Zijpp, Shaun Cardiff, M. Nieboer, C. Nierse, Sanne Schepens, Hélène van den Nieuwenhoff, Suzanne Keizer\",\"doi\":\"10.19043/ipdj.122.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Providing person-centred care with a limited workforce is a major challenge in our ageing society. While care technologies such as electronic medication-dispensing systems are a means to help older persons with chronic conditions continue living independently, few studies have explored their implementation and use from a multiple stakeholder perspective. This prompted six Dutch care organisations and a university of applied sciences to collaborate in the Living Longer @ Home practice development project. Aim: To explore the influence of medication-dispensing systems on service user self-reliance and self-determination, as well as on professional and informal carer workload, in the community setting. Methods: A total of 14 case studies were used to understand the complexity and particularity of medication-dispensing systems in community care. Case narratives were constructed by (supervised) nursing students, then collated, and critically and creatively analysed by university- and practice-based researchers. Results: The case narratives reveal that while technology can increase self-reliance and self-determination for service users, it can also raise (new) concerns about medication safety and social isolation. Even after careful medication-dispensing systems indication, introduction and implementation, carer workloads may simply be changed rather than reduced. The dyadic and triadic relationships are affected as roles and responsibilities change, and trust may need to be rebuilt. Conclusions: Working with medication-dispensing systems entails more than implementing a piece of technology. While these systems can increase the duration of safe independent living, their effect on the lifeworld of those involved also needs to be considered and prepared for. A person-centred and relationship-oriented as opposed to task-orientated approach is advisable. Implications for practice: Before the introduction of care technology, nurses should discuss its impact on service users, informal carers, themselves and the dyadic/triadic relationship Practitioners, managers and technicians should collaboratively integrate care technology into community care services (Supervised) construction of case narratives enables workplace learning and practice development\",\"PeriodicalId\":30387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Practice Development Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Practice Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.122.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/ipdj.122.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在老龄化社会中,用有限的劳动力提供以人为本的护理是一项重大挑战。虽然电子配药系统等护理技术是帮助患有慢性病的老年人继续独立生活的一种手段,但很少有研究从多方利益相关者的角度探讨其实施和使用。这促使六家荷兰护理组织和一所应用科学大学在“居家长寿”实践发展项目中进行合作。目的:探讨在社区环境中,配药系统对服务使用者自力更生和自决以及专业和非正式护理人员工作量的影响。方法:共使用14个案例研究来了解社区护理中配药系统的复杂性和特殊性。案例叙述由(受监督的)护理专业学生构建,然后由大学和实践研究人员进行整理,并进行批判性和创造性的分析。结果:案例叙述表明,虽然技术可以提高服务用户的自立和自决能力,但它也会引发对药物安全和社会孤立的(新的)担忧。即使在仔细的药物分配系统指示、引入和实施之后,护理人员的工作量也可能只是改变而不是减少。二元和三元关系会随着角色和责任的变化而受到影响,信任可能需要重建。结论:使用药物分配系统需要的不仅仅是实现一项技术。虽然这些系统可以延长安全独立生活的持续时间,但它们对相关人员生活世界的影响也需要考虑和准备。以人为中心,以关系为导向,而不是以任务为导向的方法是可取的。对实践的影响:在引入护理技术之前,护士应讨论其对服务使用者、非正式护理人员、他们自己和二元/三元关系从业者的影响,管理人员和技术人员应协同将护理技术融入社区护理服务(监督)案例叙述的构建能够促进工作场所的学习和实践发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Successful healthcare technology requires person-centred relationships and contexts: case narratives on medication-dispensing systems
Background: Providing person-centred care with a limited workforce is a major challenge in our ageing society. While care technologies such as electronic medication-dispensing systems are a means to help older persons with chronic conditions continue living independently, few studies have explored their implementation and use from a multiple stakeholder perspective. This prompted six Dutch care organisations and a university of applied sciences to collaborate in the Living Longer @ Home practice development project. Aim: To explore the influence of medication-dispensing systems on service user self-reliance and self-determination, as well as on professional and informal carer workload, in the community setting. Methods: A total of 14 case studies were used to understand the complexity and particularity of medication-dispensing systems in community care. Case narratives were constructed by (supervised) nursing students, then collated, and critically and creatively analysed by university- and practice-based researchers. Results: The case narratives reveal that while technology can increase self-reliance and self-determination for service users, it can also raise (new) concerns about medication safety and social isolation. Even after careful medication-dispensing systems indication, introduction and implementation, carer workloads may simply be changed rather than reduced. The dyadic and triadic relationships are affected as roles and responsibilities change, and trust may need to be rebuilt. Conclusions: Working with medication-dispensing systems entails more than implementing a piece of technology. While these systems can increase the duration of safe independent living, their effect on the lifeworld of those involved also needs to be considered and prepared for. A person-centred and relationship-oriented as opposed to task-orientated approach is advisable. Implications for practice: Before the introduction of care technology, nurses should discuss its impact on service users, informal carers, themselves and the dyadic/triadic relationship Practitioners, managers and technicians should collaboratively integrate care technology into community care services (Supervised) construction of case narratives enables workplace learning and practice development
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信