微生物抑制试验筛选来自菲律宾哥打巴托市Kabacan公共市场零售肉类中抗生素残留的敏感性

Joren Raña Mahusay, E. G. Sepelagio
{"title":"微生物抑制试验筛选来自菲律宾哥打巴托市Kabacan公共市场零售肉类中抗生素残留的敏感性","authors":"Joren Raña Mahusay, E. G. Sepelagio","doi":"10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The threat of antibiotic residues imposes a great concern in public health and at the same time in food safety. This study was conducted to screen antibiotic residues in retailed meats and evaluate the antibiotic sensitivity of indicator test organisms (Bacillus subtilis & Staphylococcus aureus). A total of 125 samples from three different types of meats (beef, chicken, and pork) were collected from the Public Market of Kabacan, Cotabato. Microbial Inhibition Assay utilizing B. subtilis and S. aureus were used for screening antibiotic residues. The total percentage of positive samples was 14.4%. The highest percentage was detected in chicken (22%) followed by beef (16%) and pork (6%), respectively. In evaluating the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms, Bacillus subtilis detects Amoxicillin, Enrofloxacin, Tetracycline, and Oxytetracycline up to its maximum residual limits. There was no significant difference in beef (p > 0.05) and pork samples (p > 0.05) for the detection of antibiotics by the indicator organisms, while in chicken, the analysis revealed that the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms was significantly different (p = 0.021). Hence, B. subtilis was ideal test organism than S. aureus (p<0.05). The binomial Logistic regression model also further suggests that B. subtilis was likely to be sensitive in detecting antibiotic residues in all meat types ( = -1.23, OR = 0.29, p = 0.013).","PeriodicalId":91000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of microbial inhibition assay for screening antibiotic residues in retailed meats collected from the public market of Kabacan, Cotabato, Philippines\",\"authors\":\"Joren Raña Mahusay, E. G. Sepelagio\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The threat of antibiotic residues imposes a great concern in public health and at the same time in food safety. This study was conducted to screen antibiotic residues in retailed meats and evaluate the antibiotic sensitivity of indicator test organisms (Bacillus subtilis & Staphylococcus aureus). A total of 125 samples from three different types of meats (beef, chicken, and pork) were collected from the Public Market of Kabacan, Cotabato. Microbial Inhibition Assay utilizing B. subtilis and S. aureus were used for screening antibiotic residues. The total percentage of positive samples was 14.4%. The highest percentage was detected in chicken (22%) followed by beef (16%) and pork (6%), respectively. In evaluating the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms, Bacillus subtilis detects Amoxicillin, Enrofloxacin, Tetracycline, and Oxytetracycline up to its maximum residual limits. There was no significant difference in beef (p > 0.05) and pork samples (p > 0.05) for the detection of antibiotics by the indicator organisms, while in chicken, the analysis revealed that the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms was significantly different (p = 0.021). Hence, B. subtilis was ideal test organism than S. aureus (p<0.05). The binomial Logistic regression model also further suggests that B. subtilis was likely to be sensitive in detecting antibiotic residues in all meat types ( = -1.23, OR = 0.29, p = 0.013).\",\"PeriodicalId\":91000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food safety and hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food safety and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfsh.v9i2.13422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗生素残留的威胁在公共卫生和食品安全方面引起了极大的关注。本研究旨在筛选零售肉类中的抗生素残留,并评估指示试验生物(枯草芽孢杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)的抗生素敏感性。从哥打巴托市Kabacan公共市场共收集了三种不同类型肉类(牛肉、鸡肉和猪肉)的125个样本。采用枯草芽孢杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌抑菌法筛选抗生素残留。总阳性检出率为14.4%。鸡肉中检测到的比例最高(22%),其次是牛肉(16%)和猪肉(6%)。在评价被试生物的抗生素敏感性时,枯草芽孢杆菌检测阿莫西林、恩诺沙星、四环素和土霉素达到其最大残留限度。指示生物对抗生素的检测在牛肉样品(p > 0.05)和猪肉样品(p > 0.05)中差异不显著,而在鸡肉样品中,检测生物对抗生素的敏感性差异显著(p = 0.021)。因此,枯草芽孢杆菌是比金黄色葡萄球菌更理想的试验菌(p<0.05)。二项Logistic回归模型还进一步表明,枯草芽孢杆菌对所有肉类的抗生素残留检测都很敏感(= -1.23,OR = 0.29, p = 0.013)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity of microbial inhibition assay for screening antibiotic residues in retailed meats collected from the public market of Kabacan, Cotabato, Philippines
The threat of antibiotic residues imposes a great concern in public health and at the same time in food safety. This study was conducted to screen antibiotic residues in retailed meats and evaluate the antibiotic sensitivity of indicator test organisms (Bacillus subtilis & Staphylococcus aureus). A total of 125 samples from three different types of meats (beef, chicken, and pork) were collected from the Public Market of Kabacan, Cotabato. Microbial Inhibition Assay utilizing B. subtilis and S. aureus were used for screening antibiotic residues. The total percentage of positive samples was 14.4%. The highest percentage was detected in chicken (22%) followed by beef (16%) and pork (6%), respectively. In evaluating the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms, Bacillus subtilis detects Amoxicillin, Enrofloxacin, Tetracycline, and Oxytetracycline up to its maximum residual limits. There was no significant difference in beef (p > 0.05) and pork samples (p > 0.05) for the detection of antibiotics by the indicator organisms, while in chicken, the analysis revealed that the antibiotic sensitivity of test organisms was significantly different (p = 0.021). Hence, B. subtilis was ideal test organism than S. aureus (p<0.05). The binomial Logistic regression model also further suggests that B. subtilis was likely to be sensitive in detecting antibiotic residues in all meat types ( = -1.23, OR = 0.29, p = 0.013).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信