腹膜透析对糖尿病患者血糖变异性的影响及其临床意义

Q4 Nursing
Zi-juan Zhou, Hua Zheng, Wei Li, Ying Ma, Hai-yun Wang, F. Ping, Xuemei Li, Yuxiu Li, Limeng Chen
{"title":"腹膜透析对糖尿病患者血糖变异性的影响及其临床意义","authors":"Zi-juan Zhou, Hua Zheng, Wei Li, Ying Ma, Hai-yun Wang, F. Ping, Xuemei Li, Yuxiu Li, Limeng Chen","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare glycemic profile between diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and diabetic patients with normal kidney function, and to investigate the impact of peritoneal dialysis on glycemic control through continuous glucose monitor system(CGMS). Methods 19 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (DMPD group) and 8 patients with non-diabetic nephropathy receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (PD group) were randomly selected and matched with 20 diabetic patients with normal kidney function (DM group) based on age, gender and 72 hours mean glucose. CGMS were applied on all patients for 72 hours. Glycemic variability parameters were compared among the three groups. Results Peritoneal transport function was positively correlated with mean glucose, glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion. Compared with PD group, multiple variation parameters, such as intraday glycemic standard deviation (P<0.001), covariant efficiency (P=0.009) and mean of daily difference (P=0.043), were significantly lower in DMPD group. Though both DMPD and DM group exhibited profile as trough in wee hours and post-prandial hyperglycemia, DMPD had higher glycemic level in wee hours (P<0.001). Conclusion Diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis have smaller glucose variability than diabetic patients with normal renal function. Key words: Peritoneal dialysis; Glycemic variability; Peritoneal transport level; Continuous glucose monitor system; Peritoneal glucose exposure","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"261-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of peritoneal dialysis on glycemic variability in patients with diabetes and its clinical implications\",\"authors\":\"Zi-juan Zhou, Hua Zheng, Wei Li, Ying Ma, Hai-yun Wang, F. Ping, Xuemei Li, Yuxiu Li, Limeng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To compare glycemic profile between diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and diabetic patients with normal kidney function, and to investigate the impact of peritoneal dialysis on glycemic control through continuous glucose monitor system(CGMS). Methods 19 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (DMPD group) and 8 patients with non-diabetic nephropathy receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (PD group) were randomly selected and matched with 20 diabetic patients with normal kidney function (DM group) based on age, gender and 72 hours mean glucose. CGMS were applied on all patients for 72 hours. Glycemic variability parameters were compared among the three groups. Results Peritoneal transport function was positively correlated with mean glucose, glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion. Compared with PD group, multiple variation parameters, such as intraday glycemic standard deviation (P<0.001), covariant efficiency (P=0.009) and mean of daily difference (P=0.043), were significantly lower in DMPD group. Though both DMPD and DM group exhibited profile as trough in wee hours and post-prandial hyperglycemia, DMPD had higher glycemic level in wee hours (P<0.001). Conclusion Diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis have smaller glucose variability than diabetic patients with normal renal function. Key words: Peritoneal dialysis; Glycemic variability; Peritoneal transport level; Continuous glucose monitor system; Peritoneal glucose exposure\",\"PeriodicalId\":9877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"261-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较接受腹膜透析的糖尿病患者和肾功能正常的糖尿病患者的血糖状况,并通过连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)研究腹膜透析对血糖控制的影响。方法随机选择19例接受常规腹膜透析的终末期肾病糖尿病患者(DMPD组)和8例接受常规腹腔透析的非糖尿病肾病患者(PD组),并根据年龄、性别和72小时平均血糖与20例肾功能正常的糖尿病患者(DM组)进行配对。CGMS应用于所有患者72小时。比较三组之间的血糖变异性参数。结果腹膜转运功能与平均血糖、血糖标准差和血糖漂移幅度呈正相关。与PD组相比,DMPD组的日内血糖标准差(P<0.001)、协变量效率(P=0.009)和日差平均值(P=0.043)等多个变异参数显著降低。尽管DMPD和DM组均表现为凌晨低谷和餐后高血糖,但DMPD在凌晨血糖水平较高(P<0.001)。结论接受常规腹膜透析的终末期肾病糖尿病患者的血糖变异性小于肾功能正常的糖尿病患者。关键词:腹膜透析;血糖变异性;腹膜转运水平;连续血糖监测系统;腹膜葡萄糖暴露
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of peritoneal dialysis on glycemic variability in patients with diabetes and its clinical implications
Objective To compare glycemic profile between diabetic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and diabetic patients with normal kidney function, and to investigate the impact of peritoneal dialysis on glycemic control through continuous glucose monitor system(CGMS). Methods 19 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (DMPD group) and 8 patients with non-diabetic nephropathy receiving regular peritoneal dialysis (PD group) were randomly selected and matched with 20 diabetic patients with normal kidney function (DM group) based on age, gender and 72 hours mean glucose. CGMS were applied on all patients for 72 hours. Glycemic variability parameters were compared among the three groups. Results Peritoneal transport function was positively correlated with mean glucose, glucose standard deviation and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion. Compared with PD group, multiple variation parameters, such as intraday glycemic standard deviation (P<0.001), covariant efficiency (P=0.009) and mean of daily difference (P=0.043), were significantly lower in DMPD group. Though both DMPD and DM group exhibited profile as trough in wee hours and post-prandial hyperglycemia, DMPD had higher glycemic level in wee hours (P<0.001). Conclusion Diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease receiving regular peritoneal dialysis have smaller glucose variability than diabetic patients with normal renal function. Key words: Peritoneal dialysis; Glycemic variability; Peritoneal transport level; Continuous glucose monitor system; Peritoneal glucose exposure
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华临床营养杂志
中华临床营养杂志 Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2282
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch. The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信