肖恩·麦克米金的书评:《斯大林的战争》

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY
E. Mawdsley
{"title":"肖恩·麦克米金的书评:《斯大林的战争》","authors":"E. Mawdsley","doi":"10.1177/09683445221088574f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"29 1","pages":"515 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Stalin’s War by Sean McMeekin\",\"authors\":\"E. Mawdsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09683445221088574f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War in History\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"515 - 516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War in History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221088574f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221088574f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最大限度地覆盖指挥或率先推进的指挥官、步兵和坦克乘员,而不是促成这些行动的大量后方梯队人员。这种做法在其他地方也受到了批评,尤其是亚斯明·汗和桑图·达斯,如果能看到更多地关注战时经验如何改变“尾巴”部队,即使不是更多,也会比他们的作战部队同行更多。然而,总的来说,这本书包括了对缅甸战役最后一年英联邦陆地部队的卓越描述。这种状况引发了缅甸战役史学下一步可能走向何方的问题。在整本书中,作者间接暗示了他们对第十四军的见解如何被用来发展跨国视角。在许多关键时刻(尤其是第68126-27页),它们暗示了日本帝国军队在面对第十四军的成功转型时未能充分适应的原因。然而,一个明确的答案仍然存在。此外,中国/美国北方战区司令部、昂山的缅甸国民军和盟军在印度洋的海军部队充其量只是客串部分。将大英帝国的复仇和救赎故事重新放在跨国背景下,可能不会削弱第十四军在诉讼中的主导作用,反而会让其成就更加突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Stalin’s War by Sean McMeekin
accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
War in History
War in History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信