{"title":"肖恩·麦克米金的书评:《斯大林的战争》","authors":"E. Mawdsley","doi":"10.1177/09683445221088574f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.","PeriodicalId":44606,"journal":{"name":"War in History","volume":"29 1","pages":"515 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Stalin’s War by Sean McMeekin\",\"authors\":\"E. Mawdsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09683445221088574f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"War in History\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"515 - 516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"War in History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221088574f\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"War in History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445221088574f","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
accord greatest coverage to the commanders, infantrymen, and tank crews who directed or spearheaded the advance, rather than the multitude of rear echelon personnel who enabled these moves. Such an approach has come in for criticism elsewhere, not least from Yasmin Khan and Santanu Das, and it would have been pleasing to see slightly more focus on how wartime experience transformed ‘tail’ units as much, if not more, than their combat arm peers. Nevertheless, taken as a whole, this volume comprises the preeminent existing account of British Commonwealth land forces during the final year of the Burma campaign. This status raises questions as to where the historiography of the Burma campaign might venture next. Throughout the volume, the authors allude obliquely to how their insights into Fourteenth Army might be used to develop transnational perspectives. There are numerous junctures (esp. pp. 68, 126–27) where they hint at why Imperial Japanese forces failed to adapt adequately in the face of Fourteenth Army’s successful transformation. However, a definitive answer remains latent. Moreover, the Chinese/ American Northern Combat Area Command, Aung San’s Burma National Army, and Allied naval forces in the Indian Ocean are accorded, at best, only cameo parts. Recasting a British Imperial tale of revenge and redemption into transnational context would likely not detract from Fourteenth Army’s leading role in proceedings, but rather place its accomplishments in even sharper relief.
期刊介绍:
War in History journal takes the view that military history should be integrated into a broader definition of history, and benefits from the insights provided by other approaches to history. Recognising that the study of war is more than simply the study of conflict, War in History embraces war in all its aspects: > Economic > Social > Political > Military Articles include the study of naval forces, maritime power and air forces, as well as more narrowly defined military matters. There is no restriction as to period: the journal is as receptive to the study of classical or feudal warfare as to Napoleonic. This journal provides you with a continuous update on war in history over many historical periods.