想想无法表达的东西。柏拉图与黑格尔辩证法的核心。

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Philosophical Readings Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.4073129

Leonardo Mattana

{"title":"想想无法表达的东西。柏拉图与黑格尔辩证法的核心。","authors":"Leonardo Mattana","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4073129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to analyze some characteristics of Hegelian dialectics, trying to define its centrality in the process of thought and investigating its limits. To this end, I will propose a hypothesis that implies a parallel reading of the meaning of dialectics at some moments in Platonic philosophy (particularly around the \"Unwritten Doctrines\") and others in Hegel's philosophy, especially in the Science of Logic . This confrontation will allow us to draw a line of conjunction between both authors and to elucidate the chiasm between history, thought and dialectics.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pensar lo inexpresable. El núcleo de lo dialéctico entre Platón y Hegel.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Mattana\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.4073129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to analyze some characteristics of Hegelian dialectics, trying to define its centrality in the process of thought and investigating its limits. To this end, I will propose a hypothesis that implies a parallel reading of the meaning of dialectics at some moments in Platonic philosophy (particularly around the \\\"Unwritten Doctrines\\\") and others in Hegel's philosophy, especially in the Science of Logic . This confrontation will allow us to draw a line of conjunction between both authors and to elucidate the chiasm between history, thought and dialectics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4073129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4073129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析黑格尔辩证法的一些特点，试图界定其在思想过程中的中心地位，并探讨其局限性。为此，我将提出一个假设，暗示在柏拉图哲学的某些时刻（特别是围绕“未成文的教义”）和黑格尔哲学的其他时刻，特别是在逻辑科学中，对辩证法的意义进行平行解读。这种对峙将使我们能够在两位作者之间划清界限，并阐明历史、思想和辩证法之间的交叉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pensar lo inexpresable. El núcleo de lo dialéctico entre Platón y Hegel.

The aim of this article is to analyze some characteristics of Hegelian dialectics, trying to define its centrality in the process of thought and investigating its limits. To this end, I will propose a hypothesis that implies a parallel reading of the meaning of dialectics at some moments in Platonic philosophy (particularly around the "Unwritten Doctrines") and others in Hegel's philosophy, especially in the Science of Logic . This confrontation will allow us to draw a line of conjunction between both authors and to elucidate the chiasm between history, thought and dialectics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.