探究与埃克哈特的上帝和海德格尔的存在相关的无物

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Elizabeth Parsons
{"title":"探究与埃克哈特的上帝和海德格尔的存在相关的无物","authors":"Elizabeth Parsons","doi":"10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to establish a parallel between Meister Eckhart’s statement that ‘God is Nothing’ and Martin Heidegger’s claim that ‘Being is Nothing.’ By observing a pattern of negation in the thought of both thinkers I will ultimately suggest that in these statements, they have reached the same conclusion. To observe negation in Eckhart I will examine his principle of indistinct distinction, which ultimately negates negation itself; for Heidegger I will consider the ontological difference between Being and beings, which too must necessarily be negated to disclose the Nothing. One key distinction that I aim to demonstrate between the two thinkers is how each considers the pertinence of the Nothing in human experience. For Eckhart, our experience of the Nothing has a unifying role, whereas for Heidegger it remains wholly repellent, in the literal sense of ‘driving back.’ Moreover, beyond the particulars of Eckhart and Heidegger, I will aim to defend the legitimacy of the Nothing as a philosophical concept.","PeriodicalId":40432,"journal":{"name":"Medieval Mystical Theology","volume":"30 1","pages":"37 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Nothing in Relation to Meister Eckhart’s God and Martin Heidegger’s Being\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper aims to establish a parallel between Meister Eckhart’s statement that ‘God is Nothing’ and Martin Heidegger’s claim that ‘Being is Nothing.’ By observing a pattern of negation in the thought of both thinkers I will ultimately suggest that in these statements, they have reached the same conclusion. To observe negation in Eckhart I will examine his principle of indistinct distinction, which ultimately negates negation itself; for Heidegger I will consider the ontological difference between Being and beings, which too must necessarily be negated to disclose the Nothing. One key distinction that I aim to demonstrate between the two thinkers is how each considers the pertinence of the Nothing in human experience. For Eckhart, our experience of the Nothing has a unifying role, whereas for Heidegger it remains wholly repellent, in the literal sense of ‘driving back.’ Moreover, beyond the particulars of Eckhart and Heidegger, I will aim to defend the legitimacy of the Nothing as a philosophical concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medieval Mystical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medieval Mystical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20465726.2021.1923244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在建立埃克哈特的“上帝是虚无”与海德格尔的“存在是虚无”之间的平行关系。通过观察两位思想家思想中的否定模式,我最终认为,在这些陈述中,他们得出了相同的结论。为了观察埃克哈特的否定,我将考察他的模糊区分原则,这一原则最终否定了否定本身;对于海德格尔来说,我将考虑存在与存在之间的本体论差异,这种差异也必须被否定才能揭示“无”。我想要说明的两个思想家之间的一个关键区别是,他们如何看待人类经验中“无”的相关性。对埃克哈特来说,我们对无物的经验具有统一的作用,而对海德格尔来说,它仍然是完全排斥的,在字面意义上的“击退”。此外,在埃克哈特和海德格尔的细节之外,我将致力于捍卫“无”作为一个哲学概念的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Nothing in Relation to Meister Eckhart’s God and Martin Heidegger’s Being
ABSTRACT This paper aims to establish a parallel between Meister Eckhart’s statement that ‘God is Nothing’ and Martin Heidegger’s claim that ‘Being is Nothing.’ By observing a pattern of negation in the thought of both thinkers I will ultimately suggest that in these statements, they have reached the same conclusion. To observe negation in Eckhart I will examine his principle of indistinct distinction, which ultimately negates negation itself; for Heidegger I will consider the ontological difference between Being and beings, which too must necessarily be negated to disclose the Nothing. One key distinction that I aim to demonstrate between the two thinkers is how each considers the pertinence of the Nothing in human experience. For Eckhart, our experience of the Nothing has a unifying role, whereas for Heidegger it remains wholly repellent, in the literal sense of ‘driving back.’ Moreover, beyond the particulars of Eckhart and Heidegger, I will aim to defend the legitimacy of the Nothing as a philosophical concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信