{"title":"数字化时代的无形资产与制造企业的效率——以俄罗斯为例","authors":"Y. Turovets","doi":"10.2478/emj-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A wide consensus exists on the role of intangible assets in both developed and developing economies, especially now, with the new generation of information and communication technologies. Emerging economies generally demonstrate lower endowment with intangibles (Dutz et al., 2012), but follow the same positive patterns for long-run development. In Russia, the contribution of intangibles to growth is still modest, and its capacity to foster productivity has not been achieved. As previous studies showed, efficiency represents one of the main channels of total factor productivity growth. This paper studies the effects of intangibles on the efficiency of Russian manufacturing firms in 2009–2018. Considering the heterogeneity of sectors and firms, the stochastic frontier model is applied. In general, the impact of intangibles is positive but small and influenced by external shocks and structural features. The paper provides evidence on different contributions of intangibles to efficiency for high-tech and low-tech firms and its change over time. It contributes to the strand of literature regarding the technical efficiency measurement on the microlevel. On the practical side, the paper suggests an analytical framework for differentiated policy mechanisms to drive investments in intangibles, which are essential for current digital transformation.","PeriodicalId":37237,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","volume":"13 1","pages":"7 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intangible assets and the efficiency of manufacturing firms in the age of digitalisation: the Russian case\",\"authors\":\"Y. Turovets\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/emj-2021-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A wide consensus exists on the role of intangible assets in both developed and developing economies, especially now, with the new generation of information and communication technologies. Emerging economies generally demonstrate lower endowment with intangibles (Dutz et al., 2012), but follow the same positive patterns for long-run development. In Russia, the contribution of intangibles to growth is still modest, and its capacity to foster productivity has not been achieved. As previous studies showed, efficiency represents one of the main channels of total factor productivity growth. This paper studies the effects of intangibles on the efficiency of Russian manufacturing firms in 2009–2018. Considering the heterogeneity of sectors and firms, the stochastic frontier model is applied. In general, the impact of intangibles is positive but small and influenced by external shocks and structural features. The paper provides evidence on different contributions of intangibles to efficiency for high-tech and low-tech firms and its change over time. It contributes to the strand of literature regarding the technical efficiency measurement on the microlevel. On the practical side, the paper suggests an analytical framework for differentiated policy mechanisms to drive investments in intangibles, which are essential for current digital transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Management in Production and Services\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"7 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Management in Production and Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Management in Production and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
摘要关于无形资产在发达经济体和发展中经济体中的作用,特别是在新一代信息和通信技术的今天,人们达成了广泛的共识。新兴经济体通常表现出较低的无形资产禀赋(Dutz et al.,2012),但在长期发展方面遵循相同的积极模式。在俄罗斯,无形资产对增长的贡献仍然不大,其提高生产力的能力尚未实现。正如先前的研究所表明的,效率是全要素生产率增长的主要渠道之一。本文研究了2009-2018年无形资产对俄罗斯制造业企业效率的影响。考虑到行业和企业的异质性,应用了随机前沿模型。一般来说,无形资产的影响是积极的,但很小,并受到外部冲击和结构特征的影响。本文为高技术和低技术企业无形资产对效率的不同贡献及其随时间的变化提供了证据。它有助于形成关于微观层面技术效率测量的文献。在实践方面,本文提出了一个差异化政策机制的分析框架,以推动无形资产投资,这对当前的数字化转型至关重要。
Intangible assets and the efficiency of manufacturing firms in the age of digitalisation: the Russian case
Abstract A wide consensus exists on the role of intangible assets in both developed and developing economies, especially now, with the new generation of information and communication technologies. Emerging economies generally demonstrate lower endowment with intangibles (Dutz et al., 2012), but follow the same positive patterns for long-run development. In Russia, the contribution of intangibles to growth is still modest, and its capacity to foster productivity has not been achieved. As previous studies showed, efficiency represents one of the main channels of total factor productivity growth. This paper studies the effects of intangibles on the efficiency of Russian manufacturing firms in 2009–2018. Considering the heterogeneity of sectors and firms, the stochastic frontier model is applied. In general, the impact of intangibles is positive but small and influenced by external shocks and structural features. The paper provides evidence on different contributions of intangibles to efficiency for high-tech and low-tech firms and its change over time. It contributes to the strand of literature regarding the technical efficiency measurement on the microlevel. On the practical side, the paper suggests an analytical framework for differentiated policy mechanisms to drive investments in intangibles, which are essential for current digital transformation.