斯里兰卡大学在国际排名体系中的研究生产力与图书馆员的强制性贡献

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16459

Pradeepa Wijetunge

{"title":"斯里兰卡大学在国际排名体系中的研究生产力与图书馆员的强制性贡献","authors":"Pradeepa Wijetunge","doi":"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to investigate the research productivity of the Sri Lankan state universities depicted in reputed international university ranking systems during 2015-2020 and to identify the areas that can be used to develop the research productivity of the state universities. Research–related scores of the Sri Lankan state universities from 2015-2020 in four ranking systems (THE, QS, SIR, and URAP) were analysed. The study established that the research productivity, impact, and collaboration are the major aspects considered by the ranking systems. Only a few universities are ranked and the scores have a considerable scope to be improved. Several recommendations are made on how the university librarians can support the improvement of research-related related rankings. This is the first study on research productivity scores of Sri Lankan state universities based on international ranking systems. Hence the findings will be useful for the university policymakers in Sri Lanka as well in other countries with similar educational contexts.","PeriodicalId":44921,"journal":{"name":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Productivity of Sri Lankan Universities in the International Ranking Systems and Mandatory Contribution of Librarians\",\"authors\":\"Pradeepa Wijetunge\",\"doi\":\"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to investigate the research productivity of the Sri Lankan state universities depicted in reputed international university ranking systems during 2015-2020 and to identify the areas that can be used to develop the research productivity of the state universities. Research–related scores of the Sri Lankan state universities from 2015-2020 in four ranking systems (THE, QS, SIR, and URAP) were analysed. The study established that the research productivity, impact, and collaboration are the major aspects considered by the ranking systems. Only a few universities are ranked and the scores have a considerable scope to be improved. Several recommendations are made on how the university librarians can support the improvement of research-related related rankings. This is the first study on research productivity scores of Sri Lankan state universities based on international ranking systems. Hence the findings will be useful for the university policymakers in Sri Lanka as well in other countries with similar educational contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"54-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16459\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是调查2015-2020年期间斯里兰卡州立大学在知名国际大学排名系统中所描述的研究生产力，并确定可用于发展州立大学研究生产力的领域。分析了2015-2020年斯里兰卡州立大学在四个排名系统(the、QS、SIR和URAP)中的研究相关分数。研究表明，研究效率、影响和合作是排名系统考虑的主要方面。只有少数几所大学被排名，分数有很大的提高空间。就大学图书馆员如何支持研究相关排名的改进提出了几点建议。这是第一次根据国际排名系统对斯里兰卡国立大学的研究生产力得分进行研究。因此，研究结果将对斯里兰卡以及其他具有类似教育背景的国家的大学决策者有用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Research Productivity of Sri Lankan Universities in the International Ranking Systems and Mandatory Contribution of Librarians

The objective of this study is to investigate the research productivity of the Sri Lankan state universities depicted in reputed international university ranking systems during 2015-2020 and to identify the areas that can be used to develop the research productivity of the state universities. Research–related scores of the Sri Lankan state universities from 2015-2020 in four ranking systems (THE, QS, SIR, and URAP) were analysed. The study established that the research productivity, impact, and collaboration are the major aspects considered by the ranking systems. Only a few universities are ranked and the scores have a considerable scope to be improved. Several recommendations are made on how the university librarians can support the improvement of research-related related rankings. This is the first study on research productivity scores of Sri Lankan state universities based on international ranking systems. Hence the findings will be useful for the university policymakers in Sri Lanka as well in other countries with similar educational contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology publishes original research and review papers related to library science and IT applied to library activities, services, and products. Major subject fields covered include: Information systems, Knowledge management, Collection building & management, Information behaviour & retrieval, Librarianship/library management, Library & information services, Records management & preservation, etc.