COVID-19大流行期间的反民粹主义和民粹主义炒作

Q2 Social Sciences

Representation Pub Date : 2021-12-26 DOI:10.1080/00344893.2021.2017334

Antonis Galanopoulos, Giorgos Venizelos

{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间的反民粹主义和民粹主义炒作","authors":"Antonis Galanopoulos, Giorgos Venizelos","doi":"10.1080/00344893.2021.2017334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates how ‘populism’ was used in public discussions during the COVID-19 outbreak. It argues that the indiscriminate use of ‘populism’ and its association with the pandemic is rooted in the negative way it is talked about in public debates. Critically evaluating pundit claims framing populism as an ‘anti-scientific’, ‘irresponsible’ and ‘authoritarian’ response to the health crisis, this article shows that ‘populism’ does not suffice to explain actors’ responses to COVID-19. Rather, populists’ ideological positions played a crucial role in their pandemic politics.","PeriodicalId":35158,"journal":{"name":"Representation","volume":"58 1","pages":"251 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-populism and Populist Hype During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Antonis Galanopoulos, Giorgos Venizelos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00344893.2021.2017334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article investigates how ‘populism’ was used in public discussions during the COVID-19 outbreak. It argues that the indiscriminate use of ‘populism’ and its association with the pandemic is rooted in the negative way it is talked about in public debates. Critically evaluating pundit claims framing populism as an ‘anti-scientific’, ‘irresponsible’ and ‘authoritarian’ response to the health crisis, this article shows that ‘populism’ does not suffice to explain actors’ responses to COVID-19. Rather, populists’ ideological positions played a crucial role in their pandemic politics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Representation\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Representation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2017334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2021.2017334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要本文调查了新冠肺炎疫情期间“民粹主义”是如何在公众讨论中使用的。它认为，不分青红皂白地使用“民粹主义”及其与新冠疫情的联系植根于公众辩论中对其的负面谈论。这篇文章批判性地评价了专家的说法，认为民粹主义是对健康危机的“反科学”、“不负责任”和“威权”反应，表明“民粹主义”不足以解释行为者对新冠肺炎的反应。相反，民粹主义者的意识形态立场在他们的疫情政治中发挥了至关重要的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Anti-populism and Populist Hype During the COVID-19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT This article investigates how ‘populism’ was used in public discussions during the COVID-19 outbreak. It argues that the indiscriminate use of ‘populism’ and its association with the pandemic is rooted in the negative way it is talked about in public debates. Critically evaluating pundit claims framing populism as an ‘anti-scientific’, ‘irresponsible’ and ‘authoritarian’ response to the health crisis, this article shows that ‘populism’ does not suffice to explain actors’ responses to COVID-19. Rather, populists’ ideological positions played a crucial role in their pandemic politics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Representation Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This change in scope follows two paths. Firstly, it seeks contributors who are interested in exploring the interface between democratic practice and theory. In particular, this focus seeks contributions that apply theoretical insights to actual examples of current practice. Secondly, while not neglecting the current focus of the journal, we would like to expand its international coverage so that the journal will offer our readers insights in the state of democracy worldwide.