唾液样本中SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测原型的研制

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Agnija Kivrane, Viktorija Igumnova, Elza Elizabete Liepina, D. Skrastina, A. Leončiks, Zanna Rudevica, Svjatoslavs Kistkins, A. Reinis, Anna Zilde, A. Kazaks, R. Ranka
{"title":"唾液样本中SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测原型的研制","authors":"Agnija Kivrane, Viktorija Igumnova, Elza Elizabete Liepina, D. Skrastina, A. Leončiks, Zanna Rudevica, Svjatoslavs Kistkins, A. Reinis, Anna Zilde, A. Kazaks, R. Ranka","doi":"10.48101/ujms.v127.8207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The development of easy-to-perform diagnostic methods is highly important for detecting current coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This pilot study aimed at developing a lateral flow assay (LFA)-based test prototype to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in saliva samples. Methods Mice were immunized using the recombinant receptor-binding domain (rRBD) of SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. The combinations of the obtained mouse anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) and several commercial antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to select antibody pairs for LFA. The antibody pairs were tested in a LFA format using saliva samples from individuals with early SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 9). The diagnostic performance of the developed LFA was evaluated using saliva samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 111); the median time from the onset of symptoms to sample collection was 10 days (0–24 days, interquartile range (IQR): 7–13). The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used as a reference method. Results Based on ELISA and preliminary LFA results, a combination of mouse anti-RBD PAbs (capture antibody) and rabbit anti-spike PAbs (detection antibody) was chosen for clinical analysis of sample. When compared with rRT-PCR results, LFA exhibited 26.5% sensitivity, 58.1% specificity, 50.0% positive prediction value (PPV), 33.3% negative prediction value (NPV), and 38.7% diagnostic accuracy. However, there was a reasonable improvement in assay specificity (85.7%) and PPV (91.7%) when samples were stratified based on the sampling time. Conclusion The developed LFA assay demonstrated a potential of SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples. Further technical assay improvements should be made to enhance diagnostic performance followed by a validation study in a larger cohort of both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in the early stage of infection.","PeriodicalId":23458,"journal":{"name":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of rapid antigen test prototype for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva samples\",\"authors\":\"Agnija Kivrane, Viktorija Igumnova, Elza Elizabete Liepina, D. Skrastina, A. Leončiks, Zanna Rudevica, Svjatoslavs Kistkins, A. Reinis, Anna Zilde, A. Kazaks, R. Ranka\",\"doi\":\"10.48101/ujms.v127.8207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The development of easy-to-perform diagnostic methods is highly important for detecting current coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This pilot study aimed at developing a lateral flow assay (LFA)-based test prototype to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in saliva samples. Methods Mice were immunized using the recombinant receptor-binding domain (rRBD) of SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. The combinations of the obtained mouse anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) and several commercial antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to select antibody pairs for LFA. The antibody pairs were tested in a LFA format using saliva samples from individuals with early SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 9). The diagnostic performance of the developed LFA was evaluated using saliva samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 111); the median time from the onset of symptoms to sample collection was 10 days (0–24 days, interquartile range (IQR): 7–13). The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used as a reference method. Results Based on ELISA and preliminary LFA results, a combination of mouse anti-RBD PAbs (capture antibody) and rabbit anti-spike PAbs (detection antibody) was chosen for clinical analysis of sample. When compared with rRT-PCR results, LFA exhibited 26.5% sensitivity, 58.1% specificity, 50.0% positive prediction value (PPV), 33.3% negative prediction value (NPV), and 38.7% diagnostic accuracy. However, there was a reasonable improvement in assay specificity (85.7%) and PPV (91.7%) when samples were stratified based on the sampling time. Conclusion The developed LFA assay demonstrated a potential of SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples. Further technical assay improvements should be made to enhance diagnostic performance followed by a validation study in a larger cohort of both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in the early stage of infection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upsala journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v127.8207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upsala journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48101/ujms.v127.8207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

开发易于操作的诊断方法对当前新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的检测具有重要意义。本试点研究旨在开发一种基于横向流动试验(LFA)的测试原型,以检测唾液样本中的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)。方法采用SARS-CoV-2病毒刺突蛋白重组受体结合域(rRBD)免疫小鼠。将获得的小鼠抗受体结合域(RBD)多克隆抗体(PAbs)与几种针对SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白的商业抗体结合,采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)选择LFA抗体对。使用早期SARS-CoV-2感染个体的唾液样本(n = 9)以LFA格式检测抗体对,使用住院COVID-19患者的唾液样本(n = 111)评估发展的LFA的诊断性能;从症状出现到采集样本的中位时间为10天(0-24天,四分位数间距(IQR): 7-13天)。以逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)作为参考方法。结果根据ELISA和LFA初步结果,选择小鼠抗rbd抗体(捕获抗体)和家兔抗刺突抗体(检测抗体)组合用于样品的临床分析。与rRT-PCR结果相比,LFA的敏感性为26.5%,特异性为58.1%,阳性预测值(PPV)为50.0%,阴性预测值(NPV)为33.3%,诊断准确率为38.7%。然而,根据采样时间分层后,检测特异性(85.7%)和PPV(91.7%)有了合理的提高。结论建立的LFA检测方法在唾液样品中具有检测SARS-CoV-2的潜力。在感染早期无症状和有症状患者的更大队列中进行验证研究后,应进一步改进技术检测以提高诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of rapid antigen test prototype for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva samples
Background The development of easy-to-perform diagnostic methods is highly important for detecting current coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This pilot study aimed at developing a lateral flow assay (LFA)-based test prototype to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus in saliva samples. Methods Mice were immunized using the recombinant receptor-binding domain (rRBD) of SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein. The combinations of the obtained mouse anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) and several commercial antibodies directed against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to select antibody pairs for LFA. The antibody pairs were tested in a LFA format using saliva samples from individuals with early SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 9). The diagnostic performance of the developed LFA was evaluated using saliva samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 111); the median time from the onset of symptoms to sample collection was 10 days (0–24 days, interquartile range (IQR): 7–13). The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was used as a reference method. Results Based on ELISA and preliminary LFA results, a combination of mouse anti-RBD PAbs (capture antibody) and rabbit anti-spike PAbs (detection antibody) was chosen for clinical analysis of sample. When compared with rRT-PCR results, LFA exhibited 26.5% sensitivity, 58.1% specificity, 50.0% positive prediction value (PPV), 33.3% negative prediction value (NPV), and 38.7% diagnostic accuracy. However, there was a reasonable improvement in assay specificity (85.7%) and PPV (91.7%) when samples were stratified based on the sampling time. Conclusion The developed LFA assay demonstrated a potential of SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva samples. Further technical assay improvements should be made to enhance diagnostic performance followed by a validation study in a larger cohort of both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in the early stage of infection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Upsala journal of medical sciences
Upsala journal of medical sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences is published for the Upsala Medical Society. It has been published since 1865 and is one of the oldest medical journals in Sweden. The journal publishes clinical and experimental original works in the medical field. Although focusing on regional issues, the journal always welcomes contributions from outside Sweden. Specially extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics, congress proceedings and academic dissertations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信