《时空之怪:亚里士多德、黑格尔与植物

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0333

Michael Marder

{"title":"《时空之怪:亚里士多德、黑格尔与植物","authors":"Michael Marder","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In this short text, I analyze various senses of being in time. My claim is that time forms a weird interiority through an embrace of whatever is \"in\" it. I, then, flesh out this claim through a close reading of Book IV in Aristotle's Physics, while grafting each \"measure of movement,\" through which the Greek philosopher defines time, onto the movements of plants. The result is a twisting and turning, ramified, wayward temporality that holds every sense of being in time in a vegetal embrace.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Weirdness of Being in Time: Aristotle, Hegel, and Plants\",\"authors\":\"Michael Marder\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:In this short text, I analyze various senses of being in time. My claim is that time forms a weird interiority through an embrace of whatever is \\\"in\\\" it. I, then, flesh out this claim through a close reading of Book IV in Aristotle's Physics, while grafting each \\\"measure of movement,\\\" through which the Greek philosopher defines time, onto the movements of plants. The result is a twisting and turning, ramified, wayward temporality that holds every sense of being in time in a vegetal embrace.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.4.0333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

在这篇短文中，我分析了存在的各种意义。我的观点是，时间通过拥抱任何“在”它里面的东西，形成了一种奇怪的内在性。然后，我通过仔细阅读亚里士多德的《物理学》第四卷来充实这一主张，同时将这位希腊哲学家用来定义时间的每一个“运动尺度”嫁接到植物的运动上。结果是一种扭曲的、分叉的、任性的时间性，它把每一种存在的感觉都包含在一个植物的拥抱中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Weirdness of Being in Time: Aristotle, Hegel, and Plants

abstract:In this short text, I analyze various senses of being in time. My claim is that time forms a weird interiority through an embrace of whatever is "in" it. I, then, flesh out this claim through a close reading of Book IV in Aristotle's Physics, while grafting each "measure of movement," through which the Greek philosopher defines time, onto the movements of plants. The result is a twisting and turning, ramified, wayward temporality that holds every sense of being in time in a vegetal embrace.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.