ASNR会议摘要

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emmanuel Adehunoluwa, Joseph Epperson, C. Swank, Christie Stevens, Dannae Arnold, J. Gillespie, Erina, Sarker, Jane Wigginton, Michael Foreman, R. Naftalis, R. Hamilton, Amy Porter, R. Rennaker, S. Hays, Michael Kilgard
{"title":"ASNR会议摘要","authors":"Emmanuel Adehunoluwa, Joseph Epperson, C. Swank, Christie Stevens, Dannae Arnold, J. Gillespie, Erina, Sarker, Jane Wigginton, Michael Foreman, R. Naftalis, R. Hamilton, Amy Porter, R. Rennaker, S. Hays, Michael Kilgard","doi":"10.1177/15459683221123387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Wearable sensors (e.g. accelerometers) for tracking human physical activity have allowed for measurement of objective activity performance of the upper limb in daily life. Data extracted from accelerometers can be used to quantify multiple variables measuring different aspects of upper limb performance in one or both limbs. Work to date has focused on single variables, but upper limb performance is likely multidimensional. Here, we propose multivariate categories of upper limb performance, derived from wearable sensor data, as a potential solution for improving stroke rehabilitation care. Methods: This study analyzed data extracted from bimanual, wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers in adults from three previous cohorts (N=211), two samples of persons with stroke and one sample from neurologically intact adult controls. Data used were upper limb performance variables calculated from accelerometer data, associated clinical measures, and participant demographics. A total of 12 cluster solutions (3-, 4-, or 5-clusters based with 12, 9, 7, or 5 input variables) were calculated to systematically evaluate the most parsimonious solution. Quality metrics and principal component analysis of each solution were calculated to arrive at a locally-optimal solution with respect to number of input variables and number of clusters. Data from earlier time points will be evaluated for their potential to predict eventual cluster membership. Results/Anticipated Results: Across different numbers of input variables, two principal components consistently explained the most variance. Across the models with differing numbers of upper limb input performance variables, a 5-cluster solution explained the most overall total variance (79%) and had the best model-fit (AIC improvement of 184, compared to the next best model). The clusters are named by the amount of overall upper limb activity and integration of the upper limbs into daily activity. The category names in order of increasing upper limb performance are: Minimal Activity/Rare Integration, Minimal Activity/Limited Integration, Moderate Activity/Moderate Integration, Moderate Activity/Full Integration, and High Activity/ Full Integration. People from the stroke cohorts ended up in all 5 categories while the adult controls ended up in the moderate to high categories. Variables that may predict eventual cluster membership of those in stroke cohort will be provided. Discussion/Significance: We identified 5 categories of upper limb performance formed from 5 upper limb performance variables in cohorts with and without neurological upper limb deficits. Following validation on a larger, heterogeneous sample, these categories may be used as outcomes in upper limb stroke research and implemented into clinical rehabilitation practice.","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 1","pages":"NP1 - NP38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASNR meeting Abstracts\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Adehunoluwa, Joseph Epperson, C. Swank, Christie Stevens, Dannae Arnold, J. Gillespie, Erina, Sarker, Jane Wigginton, Michael Foreman, R. Naftalis, R. Hamilton, Amy Porter, R. Rennaker, S. Hays, Michael Kilgard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221123387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Wearable sensors (e.g. accelerometers) for tracking human physical activity have allowed for measurement of objective activity performance of the upper limb in daily life. Data extracted from accelerometers can be used to quantify multiple variables measuring different aspects of upper limb performance in one or both limbs. Work to date has focused on single variables, but upper limb performance is likely multidimensional. Here, we propose multivariate categories of upper limb performance, derived from wearable sensor data, as a potential solution for improving stroke rehabilitation care. Methods: This study analyzed data extracted from bimanual, wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers in adults from three previous cohorts (N=211), two samples of persons with stroke and one sample from neurologically intact adult controls. Data used were upper limb performance variables calculated from accelerometer data, associated clinical measures, and participant demographics. A total of 12 cluster solutions (3-, 4-, or 5-clusters based with 12, 9, 7, or 5 input variables) were calculated to systematically evaluate the most parsimonious solution. Quality metrics and principal component analysis of each solution were calculated to arrive at a locally-optimal solution with respect to number of input variables and number of clusters. Data from earlier time points will be evaluated for their potential to predict eventual cluster membership. Results/Anticipated Results: Across different numbers of input variables, two principal components consistently explained the most variance. Across the models with differing numbers of upper limb input performance variables, a 5-cluster solution explained the most overall total variance (79%) and had the best model-fit (AIC improvement of 184, compared to the next best model). The clusters are named by the amount of overall upper limb activity and integration of the upper limbs into daily activity. The category names in order of increasing upper limb performance are: Minimal Activity/Rare Integration, Minimal Activity/Limited Integration, Moderate Activity/Moderate Integration, Moderate Activity/Full Integration, and High Activity/ Full Integration. People from the stroke cohorts ended up in all 5 categories while the adult controls ended up in the moderate to high categories. Variables that may predict eventual cluster membership of those in stroke cohort will be provided. Discussion/Significance: We identified 5 categories of upper limb performance formed from 5 upper limb performance variables in cohorts with and without neurological upper limb deficits. Following validation on a larger, heterogeneous sample, these categories may be used as outcomes in upper limb stroke research and implemented into clinical rehabilitation practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"NP1 - NP38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221123387\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221123387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于跟踪人类身体活动的可穿戴传感器(如加速度计)已经允许在日常生活中测量上肢的客观活动表现。从加速度计中提取的数据可用于量化多个变量,测量单侧或双侧上肢表现的不同方面。迄今为止的研究主要集中在单一变量上,但上肢的表现可能是多方面的。在这里,我们提出了基于可穿戴传感器数据的上肢表现的多元分类,作为改善中风康复护理的潜在解决方案。方法:本研究分析了来自三个先前队列(N=211)的成人双手、腕戴三轴加速度计的数据,其中两个样本来自中风患者,另一个样本来自神经完整的成人对照。使用的数据是根据加速度计数据、相关临床测量和参与者人口统计数据计算的上肢表现变量。总共计算了12个集群解决方案(基于12、9、7或5个输入变量的3、4或5个集群),以系统地评估最节省的解决方案。计算每个解决方案的质量度量和主成分分析,以获得相对于输入变量数量和集群数量的局部最优解决方案。早期时间点的数据将被评估其预测最终集群成员的潜力。结果/预期结果:在不同数量的输入变量中,两个主成分一致地解释了最大的方差。在具有不同数量上肢输入性能变量的模型中,5簇解决方案解释了最多的总体总方差(79%),并且具有最佳的模型拟合(与次优模型相比,AIC提高了184)。这些群集是根据整体上肢活动量和上肢融入日常活动的程度来命名的。提高上肢表现的类别名称依次为:最少活动/很少整合、最少活动/有限整合、中等活动/中等整合、中等活动/完全整合、高活动/完全整合。中风组的人在这5个类别中都有,而成人对照组则在中等到高类别中。将提供可能预测卒中队列中最终群集成员的变量。讨论/意义:我们在有或无神经功能障碍的队列中确定了由5个上肢表现变量形成的5类上肢表现。在更大的异质性样本上进行验证后,这些分类可以作为上肢卒中研究的结果,并应用于临床康复实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASNR meeting Abstracts
Background: Wearable sensors (e.g. accelerometers) for tracking human physical activity have allowed for measurement of objective activity performance of the upper limb in daily life. Data extracted from accelerometers can be used to quantify multiple variables measuring different aspects of upper limb performance in one or both limbs. Work to date has focused on single variables, but upper limb performance is likely multidimensional. Here, we propose multivariate categories of upper limb performance, derived from wearable sensor data, as a potential solution for improving stroke rehabilitation care. Methods: This study analyzed data extracted from bimanual, wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers in adults from three previous cohorts (N=211), two samples of persons with stroke and one sample from neurologically intact adult controls. Data used were upper limb performance variables calculated from accelerometer data, associated clinical measures, and participant demographics. A total of 12 cluster solutions (3-, 4-, or 5-clusters based with 12, 9, 7, or 5 input variables) were calculated to systematically evaluate the most parsimonious solution. Quality metrics and principal component analysis of each solution were calculated to arrive at a locally-optimal solution with respect to number of input variables and number of clusters. Data from earlier time points will be evaluated for their potential to predict eventual cluster membership. Results/Anticipated Results: Across different numbers of input variables, two principal components consistently explained the most variance. Across the models with differing numbers of upper limb input performance variables, a 5-cluster solution explained the most overall total variance (79%) and had the best model-fit (AIC improvement of 184, compared to the next best model). The clusters are named by the amount of overall upper limb activity and integration of the upper limbs into daily activity. The category names in order of increasing upper limb performance are: Minimal Activity/Rare Integration, Minimal Activity/Limited Integration, Moderate Activity/Moderate Integration, Moderate Activity/Full Integration, and High Activity/ Full Integration. People from the stroke cohorts ended up in all 5 categories while the adult controls ended up in the moderate to high categories. Variables that may predict eventual cluster membership of those in stroke cohort will be provided. Discussion/Significance: We identified 5 categories of upper limb performance formed from 5 upper limb performance variables in cohorts with and without neurological upper limb deficits. Following validation on a larger, heterogeneous sample, these categories may be used as outcomes in upper limb stroke research and implemented into clinical rehabilitation practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信