多发性硬化症急性复发治疗的疗效、安全性和生活质量:随机对照试验的文献综述结果

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J. Costello, A. Njue, M. Lyall, A. Heyes, Nancy Mahler, M. Philbin, T. Nazareth
{"title":"多发性硬化症急性复发治疗的疗效、安全性和生活质量:随机对照试验的文献综述结果","authors":"J. Costello, A. Njue, M. Lyall, A. Heyes, Nancy Mahler, M. Philbin, T. Nazareth","doi":"10.2147/DNND.S208815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies. Methods English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy. Results Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP. Conclusions RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.","PeriodicalId":93972,"journal":{"name":"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DNND.S208815","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"J. Costello, A. Njue, M. Lyall, A. Heyes, Nancy Mahler, M. Philbin, T. Nazareth\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DNND.S208815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies. Methods English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy. Results Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP. Conclusions RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DNND.S208815\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S208815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S208815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景静脉注射甲基强的松龙(IVMP)、促肾上腺皮质激素注射液(RCI)、血浆置换术(PMP)和静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)用于治疗急性多发性硬化症(MS)复发。对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统文献综述(SLR),以检查这些疗法的最高质量证据。方法根据系统评价和荟萃分析标准的首选报告项目,在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索截至2016年5月的英语文章。还检索了MS会议、SLR和纳入研究的目录。符合条件的研究包括接受≥1种上述治疗的成年人。结果共确定23项随机对照试验:疗效22项,安全性11项,生活质量3项(IVMP 18项,RCI 2项,PMP 2项,IVIG 2项)。IVMP和RCI改善了复发相关的残疾;然而,IVIG和PMP显示出不一致的疗效。仅确定IVMP的QOL数据。结论随机对照试验表明IVMP和RCI是治疗MS复发的有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。总体而言,许多随机对照试验都是过时的,样本量不到30名患者,没有复发的定义,也没有临床显著变化。仍然需要为所有感兴趣的复发治疗提供现代证据,包括疗效、安全性和生活质量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials
Background Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies. Methods English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy. Results Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP. Conclusions RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信