不同工艺提取柑橘果皮中果胶的比较研究

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Muskan Kumari, Shubhendra Singh, Anil Kumar Chauhan
{"title":"不同工艺提取柑橘果皮中果胶的比较研究","authors":"Muskan Kumari,&nbsp;Shubhendra Singh,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Chauhan","doi":"10.1007/s11947-023-03059-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Fruit waste has considerable potential for valorization as a pectin source. This research work concentrated on assessing the ability of kinnow (<i>Citrus reticulata</i>) peel as a raw material for pectin isolation. Pectin was isolated from kinnow peel through conventional methods (aqueous extraction and acid-assisted extraction) and novel green methods (microwave and ultrasound-assisted extraction). The pectin obtained with these techniques was analyzed and compared in terms of yield and physicochemical properties. The pectin yield ranged from 18.57% (aqueous extraction) to 30.59% (ultrasound-assisted extraction). The isolated pectin contained methoxyl (5.8 to 7.2%), anhydrouronic acid (57.6 to 73.4%), degree of esterification (55.7 to 80%), and galacturonic acid (64.5 to 68.2%). Structural analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction showed that the pectin extracted was pure, crystalline, and of high methoxyl in nature. The scanning electron microscopy result showed that the ultrasonic treatment affected the pectin matrix, thus causing the disruption of bonds between pectin molecules. According to the result of characterization, it can be concluded that novel green technologies provide better pectin in terms of yield and quality in comparison with conventional techniques.\n</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":562,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","volume":"16 10","pages":"2272 - 2286"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Extraction of Pectin from Kinnow (Citrus reticulata) Peel Using Different Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Muskan Kumari,&nbsp;Shubhendra Singh,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Chauhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11947-023-03059-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>Fruit waste has considerable potential for valorization as a pectin source. This research work concentrated on assessing the ability of kinnow (<i>Citrus reticulata</i>) peel as a raw material for pectin isolation. Pectin was isolated from kinnow peel through conventional methods (aqueous extraction and acid-assisted extraction) and novel green methods (microwave and ultrasound-assisted extraction). The pectin obtained with these techniques was analyzed and compared in terms of yield and physicochemical properties. The pectin yield ranged from 18.57% (aqueous extraction) to 30.59% (ultrasound-assisted extraction). The isolated pectin contained methoxyl (5.8 to 7.2%), anhydrouronic acid (57.6 to 73.4%), degree of esterification (55.7 to 80%), and galacturonic acid (64.5 to 68.2%). Structural analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction showed that the pectin extracted was pure, crystalline, and of high methoxyl in nature. The scanning electron microscopy result showed that the ultrasonic treatment affected the pectin matrix, thus causing the disruption of bonds between pectin molecules. According to the result of characterization, it can be concluded that novel green technologies provide better pectin in terms of yield and quality in comparison with conventional techniques.\\n</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"2272 - 2286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioprocess Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-023-03059-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioprocess Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11947-023-03059-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要水果废弃物作为果胶来源具有相当大的增值潜力。本研究主要研究了柑橘果皮作为分离果胶原料的能力。采用传统的水萃取法和酸萃取法以及新型的绿色萃取法(微波和超声辅助萃取法)从金果果皮中分离出果胶。从产率、理化性质等方面对所制果胶进行了分析比较。果胶得率为18.57%(水提法)~ 30.59%(超声辅助法)。分离得到的果胶中含有甲氧基(5.8 ~ 7.2%)、无水醛酸(57.6% ~ 73.4%)、酯化度(55.7 ~ 80%)和半乳糖醛酸(64.5 ~ 68.2%)。傅里叶变换红外光谱和x射线衍射的结构分析表明,所提取的果胶纯度高,结晶性好,甲氧基含量高。扫描电镜结果表明,超声波处理对果胶基质产生了影响,导致果胶分子之间的键被破坏。根据表征结果,可以得出结论,与传统技术相比,新型绿色技术在产量和质量方面都能提供更好的果胶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of the Extraction of Pectin from Kinnow (Citrus reticulata) Peel Using Different Techniques

Abstract

Fruit waste has considerable potential for valorization as a pectin source. This research work concentrated on assessing the ability of kinnow (Citrus reticulata) peel as a raw material for pectin isolation. Pectin was isolated from kinnow peel through conventional methods (aqueous extraction and acid-assisted extraction) and novel green methods (microwave and ultrasound-assisted extraction). The pectin obtained with these techniques was analyzed and compared in terms of yield and physicochemical properties. The pectin yield ranged from 18.57% (aqueous extraction) to 30.59% (ultrasound-assisted extraction). The isolated pectin contained methoxyl (5.8 to 7.2%), anhydrouronic acid (57.6 to 73.4%), degree of esterification (55.7 to 80%), and galacturonic acid (64.5 to 68.2%). Structural analysis by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction showed that the pectin extracted was pure, crystalline, and of high methoxyl in nature. The scanning electron microscopy result showed that the ultrasonic treatment affected the pectin matrix, thus causing the disruption of bonds between pectin molecules. According to the result of characterization, it can be concluded that novel green technologies provide better pectin in terms of yield and quality in comparison with conventional techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Bioprocess Technology
Food and Bioprocess Technology 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
19.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Food and Bioprocess Technology provides an effective and timely platform for cutting-edge high quality original papers in the engineering and science of all types of food processing technologies, from the original food supply source to the consumer’s dinner table. It aims to be a leading international journal for the multidisciplinary agri-food research community. The journal focuses especially on experimental or theoretical research findings that have the potential for helping the agri-food industry to improve process efficiency, enhance product quality and, extend shelf-life of fresh and processed agri-food products. The editors present critical reviews on new perspectives to established processes, innovative and emerging technologies, and trends and future research in food and bioproducts processing. The journal also publishes short communications for rapidly disseminating preliminary results, letters to the Editor on recent developments and controversy, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信