理性和公平。从中世纪教会法到欧洲人权法院，欧洲的宪政

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

Comparative Legal History Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258

A. Monti

{"title":"理性和公平。从中世纪教会法到欧洲人权法院，欧洲的宪政","authors":"A. Monti","doi":"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"local concerns, and could only translate with difficulty to first an imperial republic, and second an extensive empire. These criticisms should not detract from what is an impressive volume. I use them only to highlight the inherent issues that are true of any history attempted on this scale. This remains a work of tremendous worth. Vast in scope and ambition, guided by an inquiring mind, this is a deeply enjoyable and thought-provoking book. May takes a vast assortment of different legal traditions, ideas and sources, and demonstrates the benefits of comparative history. It is then best judged not on the intricacies of each chapter; but rather the overarching ambition and ability to draw out comparisons between such different experiences of law; in thought, action and deed.","PeriodicalId":53815,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"55 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reason and fairness. Constituting justice in Europe, from medieval canon law to ECHR\",\"authors\":\"A. Monti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"local concerns, and could only translate with difficulty to first an imperial republic, and second an extensive empire. These criticisms should not detract from what is an impressive volume. I use them only to highlight the inherent issues that are true of any history attempted on this scale. This remains a work of tremendous worth. Vast in scope and ambition, guided by an inquiring mind, this is a deeply enjoyable and thought-provoking book. May takes a vast assortment of different legal traditions, ideas and sources, and demonstrates the benefits of comparative history. It is then best judged not on the intricacies of each chapter; but rather the overarching ambition and ability to draw out comparisons between such different experiences of law; in thought, action and deed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Legal History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2020.1757258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

地方问题，只能艰难地转化为第一个帝国共和国，第二个广泛的帝国。这些批评不应减损这本令人印象深刻的书。我使用它们只是为了强调在这种规模上尝试的任何历史中都存在的固有问题。这仍然是一件非常有价值的作品。这是一本非常有趣和发人深省的书，内容丰富，雄心勃勃，以探究的心态为指导。梅采用了各种不同的法律传统、思想和来源，并展示了比较历史的好处。因此，最好不要根据每一章的复杂性来判断；而是在这种不同的法律经验之间进行比较的总体雄心和能力；在思想、行动和行动方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reason and fairness. Constituting justice in Europe, from medieval canon law to ECHR

local concerns, and could only translate with difficulty to first an imperial republic, and second an extensive empire. These criticisms should not detract from what is an impressive volume. I use them only to highlight the inherent issues that are true of any history attempted on this scale. This remains a work of tremendous worth. Vast in scope and ambition, guided by an inquiring mind, this is a deeply enjoyable and thought-provoking book. May takes a vast assortment of different legal traditions, ideas and sources, and demonstrates the benefits of comparative history. It is then best judged not on the intricacies of each chapter; but rather the overarching ambition and ability to draw out comparisons between such different experiences of law; in thought, action and deed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Comparative Legal History LAW-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Comparative Legal History is an international and comparative review of law and history. Articles will explore both ''internal'' legal history (doctrinal and disciplinary developments in the law) and ''external'' legal history (legal ideas and institutions in wider contexts). Rooted in the complexity of the various Western legal traditions worldwide, the journal will also investigate other laws and customs from around the globe. Comparisons may be either temporal or geographical and both legal and other law-like normative traditions will be considered. Scholarship on comparative and trans-national historiography, including trans-disciplinary approaches, is particularly welcome.