神经认知增强:应用和伦理问题

Q3 Medicine
Giulia Fronda, D. Crivelli, M. Balconi
{"title":"神经认知增强:应用和伦理问题","authors":"Giulia Fronda, D. Crivelli, M. Balconi","doi":"10.15540/nr.6.3.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the interest in neurocognitive empowerment has increased, thus making it a hot topic, especially because of possible ethical implications. Specifically, the term neurocognitive empowerment refers to the use of different neuroscientific techniques and tools that increase the cognitive functioning of the individual beyond the normal threshold—on the one hand, improving functions such as attention, perception, and memory—and, on the other hand, physical and motor functions. Neuroethics is peculiarly interested in monitoring and discussing ethical implications and possible consequences or undesirable effects of neurocognitive strengthening techniques. In particular, the use of different tools for neurocognitive enhancement requires an in-depth analysis of the ethical and legal principles in terms of security and social justice that allow the improvement of mental and physical functions of an individual. The present work aims at introducing the use of specific techniques—such as neurofeedback devices for the enhancement of attention regulation skill—in specific application contexts; that is, sports in which athletes are continuously subjected to external pressures for performance and constant improvement. Furthermore, this document explores possible ethical critical issues raised by such use of neurocognitive enhancement techniques.","PeriodicalId":37439,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRegulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurocognitive Enhancement: Applications and Ethical Issues\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Fronda, D. Crivelli, M. Balconi\",\"doi\":\"10.15540/nr.6.3.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the interest in neurocognitive empowerment has increased, thus making it a hot topic, especially because of possible ethical implications. Specifically, the term neurocognitive empowerment refers to the use of different neuroscientific techniques and tools that increase the cognitive functioning of the individual beyond the normal threshold—on the one hand, improving functions such as attention, perception, and memory—and, on the other hand, physical and motor functions. Neuroethics is peculiarly interested in monitoring and discussing ethical implications and possible consequences or undesirable effects of neurocognitive strengthening techniques. In particular, the use of different tools for neurocognitive enhancement requires an in-depth analysis of the ethical and legal principles in terms of security and social justice that allow the improvement of mental and physical functions of an individual. The present work aims at introducing the use of specific techniques—such as neurofeedback devices for the enhancement of attention regulation skill—in specific application contexts; that is, sports in which athletes are continuously subjected to external pressures for performance and constant improvement. Furthermore, this document explores possible ethical critical issues raised by such use of neurocognitive enhancement techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRegulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.6.3.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRegulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15540/nr.6.3.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

近年来,对神经认知授权的兴趣有所增加,从而使其成为一个热门话题,特别是因为可能涉及伦理问题。具体来说,神经认知授权指的是使用不同的神经科学技术和工具,使个人的认知功能超出正常阈值,一方面,提高注意力、感知和记忆等功能,另一方面,提高身体和运动功能。神经伦理学对监测和讨论神经认知强化技术的伦理含义和可能的后果或不良影响特别感兴趣。特别是,使用不同的工具来增强神经认知需要对安全和社会正义方面的伦理和法律原则进行深入分析,这些原则允许改善个人的精神和身体功能。目前的工作旨在介绍在特定应用环境中使用特定技术-例如用于增强注意力调节技能的神经反馈设备;即运动员不断受到外界压力以取得成绩和不断进步的运动。此外,本文还探讨了使用神经认知增强技术可能引起的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neurocognitive Enhancement: Applications and Ethical Issues
In recent years, the interest in neurocognitive empowerment has increased, thus making it a hot topic, especially because of possible ethical implications. Specifically, the term neurocognitive empowerment refers to the use of different neuroscientific techniques and tools that increase the cognitive functioning of the individual beyond the normal threshold—on the one hand, improving functions such as attention, perception, and memory—and, on the other hand, physical and motor functions. Neuroethics is peculiarly interested in monitoring and discussing ethical implications and possible consequences or undesirable effects of neurocognitive strengthening techniques. In particular, the use of different tools for neurocognitive enhancement requires an in-depth analysis of the ethical and legal principles in terms of security and social justice that allow the improvement of mental and physical functions of an individual. The present work aims at introducing the use of specific techniques—such as neurofeedback devices for the enhancement of attention regulation skill—in specific application contexts; that is, sports in which athletes are continuously subjected to external pressures for performance and constant improvement. Furthermore, this document explores possible ethical critical issues raised by such use of neurocognitive enhancement techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRegulation
NeuroRegulation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRegulation is a peer-reviewed journal providing an integrated, multidisciplinary perspective on clinically relevant research, treatment, reviews, and public policy for neuroregulation and neurotherapy. NeuroRegulation publishes important findings in these fields with a focus on electroencephalography (EEG), neurofeedback (EEG biofeedback), quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG), psychophysiology, biofeedback, heart rate variability, photobiomodulation, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Simulation (rTMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); with a focus on treatment of psychiatric, mind-body, and neurological disorders. In addition to research findings and reviews, it is important to stress that publication of case reports is always useful in furthering the advancement of an intervention for both clinical and normative functioning. We strive for high quality and interesting empirical topics presented in a rigorous and scholarly manner. The journal draws from expertise inside and outside of the International Society for Neurofeedback & Research (ISNR) to deliver material which integrates the diverse aspects of the field, to include: *basic science *clinical aspects *treatment evaluation *philosophy *training and certification issues *technology and equipment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信