光子衰减计算软件工具——比较研究

Q2 Physics and Astronomy
S. Arun Kumar , S.K. Shashikumar , M.R. Ambika , M.B. Karthik Kumar , N. Nagaiah , Mayeen Uddin Khandaker
{"title":"光子衰减计算软件工具——比较研究","authors":"S. Arun Kumar ,&nbsp;S.K. Shashikumar ,&nbsp;M.R. Ambika ,&nbsp;M.B. Karthik Kumar ,&nbsp;N. Nagaiah ,&nbsp;Mayeen Uddin Khandaker","doi":"10.1016/j.physo.2023.100175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare &amp; explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation coefficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV–433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36067,"journal":{"name":"Physics Open","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photon attenuation computational software tools - A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"S. Arun Kumar ,&nbsp;S.K. Shashikumar ,&nbsp;M.R. Ambika ,&nbsp;M.B. Karthik Kumar ,&nbsp;N. Nagaiah ,&nbsp;Mayeen Uddin Khandaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.physo.2023.100175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare &amp; explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation coefficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV–433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics Open\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666032623000406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Physics and Astronomy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666032623000406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各种光子衰减软件工具被研究人员广泛用于从理论上评估元素/化合物/复合材料的辐射屏蔽参数。一些研究人员正在尝试更新和开发这类软件工具。然而,就它们的比较而言,这些工具的功效还有待探索。因此,本研究试图比较& &;探索在Phy-X、XCOM、FFAST和XMuDat等广泛使用和最值得信赖的光子衰减数据库中最好的工具,以评估铋和钨填充的pva基复合材料的屏蔽参数,以及铋、钨、金、铜、铂、铅和重晶石等材料。对计算和实验所得数据的仔细分析表明,虽然Phy-X工具在能量范围的选择上提供了多种屏蔽参数,但需要注意的是,要精确地获得目标复合材料的吸收边缘,需要计算出该工具。XCOM数据库提供了锐利的吸收边缘;然而,该工具给出了对应于特定吸收边缘能量的质量衰减系数的多个值。另一方面,FFAST工具提供了锐利的吸收边缘以及X射线精细结构。然而,该工具仅限于处理能量范围为1kv - 433 keV的元素和化合物,这限制了该工具的利用。此外,XMuDat工具在处理其库/数据库中可用的材料方面有一个限制选项,并提供了质量衰减系数和其他四个参数。但是,XMuDat提供了大量的数据点,这有助于识别参数值中的任何微小偏差。因此,本研究表明,XMuDat工具在详细研究各种辐射屏蔽参数方面比其他工具更具优势和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photon attenuation computational software tools - A comparative study

Various photon attenuation software tools are being used widely by researchers to evaluate the radiation shielding parameters of the elements/compounds/composites theoretically. Attempts are being made by a few researchers to update and develop software tools of these kinds. However, the efficacy of these tools in terms of their comparison is yet to be explored. Thus, an attempt has been made in the present study to compare & explore the best tool among the widely used and most trusted tools, such as Phy-X, XCOM, FFAST and XMuDat photon attenuation databases, to evaluate the shielding parameters of PVA-based composites filled with bismuth and tungsten, and also for materials such as bismuth, tungsten, gold, copper, platinum, lead and barite. Careful analysis of the data obtained computationally and experimentally shows that, although the Phy-X tool provides various shielding parameters with multiple choices in the selection of energy range, it is noticed that this tool needs to be figured out for obtaining the absorption edges of the composites of interest precisely. The XCOM database provides sharp absorption edges; however, this tool gives multiple values of mass attenuation coefficients corresponding to a particular absorption edge energy. On the other hand, The FFAST tool provides sharp absorption edges along with X ray fine structure. However, the tool restricts to work with elements and compounds in the energy range 1 keV–433 keV, which limits the utilization of this tool. Furthermore, the XMuDat tool has a limiting option to work with the materials available in its library/database and provides the mass attenuation coefficient and four other parameters. However, the XMuDat provides a large number of data points, which helps to identify any minute deviation in the values of the parameters. Therefore, the present study suggests that the XMuDat tool is much more advantageous and reliable than the other tools for the detailed study of various radiation shielding parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics Open
Physics Open Physics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信