“黑暗生态”与作品与日子

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
HELIOS Pub Date : 2018-10-26 DOI:10.1353/HEL.2018.0000
William Brockliss
{"title":"“黑暗生态”与作品与日子","authors":"William Brockliss","doi":"10.1353/HEL.2018.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The ecocritic and philosopher Timothy Morton has recently proposed an aesthetics of “dark ecology” as the appropriate artistic response to difficult environments. Our interactions with such environments encourage us to recognize that we are neither superior to nor entirely separate from the objects and living beings that surround us. Accordingly, dark ecological art explores interpenetrations of human bodies and human psychologies with elements of our environments, including the products of human hands. But it sees no cause for celebration in such insights: rather, it delivers them in a consistently ‘dark,’ pessimistic tone. In this essay I argue that Morton’s ideas can enrich our understanding of the Hesiodic Works and Days, which places emphasis on the difficulty of interacting with the environments of the Greek world. And while some passages seem to accord a privileged status to humans, many others stress the interpenetration of the human and the nonhuman, doing so in the sort of pessimistic tone that Morton associates with his dark ecological aesthetic.","PeriodicalId":43032,"journal":{"name":"HELIOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/HEL.2018.0000","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Dark Ecology” and the Works and Days\",\"authors\":\"William Brockliss\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/HEL.2018.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The ecocritic and philosopher Timothy Morton has recently proposed an aesthetics of “dark ecology” as the appropriate artistic response to difficult environments. Our interactions with such environments encourage us to recognize that we are neither superior to nor entirely separate from the objects and living beings that surround us. Accordingly, dark ecological art explores interpenetrations of human bodies and human psychologies with elements of our environments, including the products of human hands. But it sees no cause for celebration in such insights: rather, it delivers them in a consistently ‘dark,’ pessimistic tone. In this essay I argue that Morton’s ideas can enrich our understanding of the Hesiodic Works and Days, which places emphasis on the difficulty of interacting with the environments of the Greek world. And while some passages seem to accord a privileged status to humans, many others stress the interpenetration of the human and the nonhuman, doing so in the sort of pessimistic tone that Morton associates with his dark ecological aesthetic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HELIOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/HEL.2018.0000\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HELIOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/HEL.2018.0000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HELIOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/HEL.2018.0000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:生态批评家和哲学家蒂莫西·莫顿最近提出了一种“黑暗生态”美学,作为对困难环境的适当艺术回应。我们与这些环境的互动鼓励我们认识到,我们既不优越,也不完全独立于我们周围的物体和生物。因此,黑暗生态艺术探索人体和人类心理与环境元素的相互渗透,包括人类双手的产物。但它认为这样的见解没有值得庆祝的理由:相反,它以一贯的“黑暗”、悲观的语气发表了这些见解。在本文中,我认为莫顿的思想可以丰富我们对《赫西代作品与日子》的理解,《赫西代作品与日子》强调了与希腊世界环境互动的困难。虽然有些段落似乎赋予了人类特权地位,但其他许多段落强调了人类和非人类的相互渗透,用一种悲观的语气,莫顿将其与他的黑暗生态美学联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Dark Ecology” and the Works and Days
Abstract:The ecocritic and philosopher Timothy Morton has recently proposed an aesthetics of “dark ecology” as the appropriate artistic response to difficult environments. Our interactions with such environments encourage us to recognize that we are neither superior to nor entirely separate from the objects and living beings that surround us. Accordingly, dark ecological art explores interpenetrations of human bodies and human psychologies with elements of our environments, including the products of human hands. But it sees no cause for celebration in such insights: rather, it delivers them in a consistently ‘dark,’ pessimistic tone. In this essay I argue that Morton’s ideas can enrich our understanding of the Hesiodic Works and Days, which places emphasis on the difficulty of interacting with the environments of the Greek world. And while some passages seem to accord a privileged status to humans, many others stress the interpenetration of the human and the nonhuman, doing so in the sort of pessimistic tone that Morton associates with his dark ecological aesthetic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HELIOS
HELIOS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信