面向消费者评价工具设计中的混合方法研究

D. Gallant, N. Luthy
{"title":"面向消费者评价工具设计中的混合方法研究","authors":"D. Gallant, N. Luthy","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v16i34.583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nBackground: The educational product market has been gradually shifting from primarily print to primarily digital content. Educators must make quick decisions when selecting materials that will assist students in their learning. \nPurpose: Purposes of this study were to describe the application of a two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design in designing an instrument for consumer-oriented evaluation and to describe implications of using mixed methods research in developing a rubric to evaluate prekindergarten through Grade 12 digital content. \nSetting: The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. \n  \n \n \nIntervention: N/A. \nResearch design: A two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design. \nData collection & analysis: In Stage 1, a modified electronic Delphi survey technique was implemented with US geographically dispersed subject matter experts. In Stage 2, cross-sectional focus group interviews were conducted with local teachers, administrators, and textbook publishers. \nFindings: Inclusion of multiple perspectives and viewpoints from teachers, administrators, textbook publishers, and experts on importance, clarity, and appropriateness of criteria to evaluate digital content resulted in a final version of the rubric that can be used by teachers and administrators to evaluate digital content that supports students’ learning in prekindergarten through Grade 12. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":91909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed Methods Research in Designing an Instrument for Consumer-Oriented Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"D. Gallant, N. Luthy\",\"doi\":\"10.56645/jmde.v16i34.583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\nBackground: The educational product market has been gradually shifting from primarily print to primarily digital content. Educators must make quick decisions when selecting materials that will assist students in their learning. \\nPurpose: Purposes of this study were to describe the application of a two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design in designing an instrument for consumer-oriented evaluation and to describe implications of using mixed methods research in developing a rubric to evaluate prekindergarten through Grade 12 digital content. \\nSetting: The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. \\n  \\n \\n \\nIntervention: N/A. \\nResearch design: A two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design. \\nData collection & analysis: In Stage 1, a modified electronic Delphi survey technique was implemented with US geographically dispersed subject matter experts. In Stage 2, cross-sectional focus group interviews were conducted with local teachers, administrators, and textbook publishers. \\nFindings: Inclusion of multiple perspectives and viewpoints from teachers, administrators, textbook publishers, and experts on importance, clarity, and appropriateness of criteria to evaluate digital content resulted in a final version of the rubric that can be used by teachers and administrators to evaluate digital content that supports students’ learning in prekindergarten through Grade 12. \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":91909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i34.583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multidisciplinary evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i34.583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:教育产品市场已经逐渐从以印刷品为主转向以数字内容为主。教育工作者在选择有助于学生学习的材料时必须迅速做出决定。目的:本研究的目的是描述两阶段顺序混合方法、混合模型设计在设计面向消费者的评估工具中的应用,并描述使用混合方法研究开发评估幼儿园前至12年级数字内容的量规的意义。背景:俄亥俄州立大学,俄亥俄州哥伦布市。干预措施:不适用。研究设计:两阶段顺序混合方法,混合模型设计。数据收集和分析:在第一阶段,与美国地理位置分散的主题专家一起实施了一种改进的德尔菲电子调查技术。在第二阶段,对当地教师、管理人员和教科书出版商进行了跨部门焦点小组访谈。研究结果:纳入了教师、管理人员、教科书出版商和专家对评估数字内容标准的重要性、清晰度和适当性的多种观点和观点,形成了教师和管理人员可用于评估支持学生从幼儿园前到12年级学习的数字内容的最终版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed Methods Research in Designing an Instrument for Consumer-Oriented Evaluation
Background: The educational product market has been gradually shifting from primarily print to primarily digital content. Educators must make quick decisions when selecting materials that will assist students in their learning. Purpose: Purposes of this study were to describe the application of a two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design in designing an instrument for consumer-oriented evaluation and to describe implications of using mixed methods research in developing a rubric to evaluate prekindergarten through Grade 12 digital content. Setting: The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.   Intervention: N/A. Research design: A two-stage sequential mixed-method, mixed-model design. Data collection & analysis: In Stage 1, a modified electronic Delphi survey technique was implemented with US geographically dispersed subject matter experts. In Stage 2, cross-sectional focus group interviews were conducted with local teachers, administrators, and textbook publishers. Findings: Inclusion of multiple perspectives and viewpoints from teachers, administrators, textbook publishers, and experts on importance, clarity, and appropriateness of criteria to evaluate digital content resulted in a final version of the rubric that can be used by teachers and administrators to evaluate digital content that supports students’ learning in prekindergarten through Grade 12.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信