{"title":"瑟斯达拉骑手与五世纪欧洲的马术精英","authors":"Elna Siv Kristoffersen","doi":"10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sösdala is no longer just a style – not after the publication of the three early fifth century, spectacular depositions Sösdala I–II and Fulltofta from the central part of Scania. The 17 chapters, followed by summary and captions in Russian, are written by 15 authors from five different countries. Extensive catalogues and illustrations support the text, and the high-quality photos invite us into the book. Informative reconstructions of bridles and saddles make the discussions of the many mounts easier to follow. The concluding chapter 17, written by the editors, works well as an introduction to the book. In chapter 1 Charlotte Fabech presents a comprehensive study on the ‘rescue, musealisation and oblivion’ of the Sösdala and Fulltofta finds. Ulf Näsman deals with the research history of the Sösdala style in chapter 5, discussing chronology as well as its relation to Late Roman provincial art and the Nydam style. Anna Bitner-Wroblewska (chapter 12) prefers the concept ‘Sösdala horizon’ and incorporates ceremonial horse bridles, shieldshaped, bi-conical and pelta-shaped pendants and silver sheet brooches covered by an elaborate and varied stamped ornamentation, shallow chip-carving and niello inlay.","PeriodicalId":45030,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Søsdala Horsemen and the Equestrian Elite of Fifth Century Europe\",\"authors\":\"Elna Siv Kristoffersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sösdala is no longer just a style – not after the publication of the three early fifth century, spectacular depositions Sösdala I–II and Fulltofta from the central part of Scania. The 17 chapters, followed by summary and captions in Russian, are written by 15 authors from five different countries. Extensive catalogues and illustrations support the text, and the high-quality photos invite us into the book. Informative reconstructions of bridles and saddles make the discussions of the many mounts easier to follow. The concluding chapter 17, written by the editors, works well as an introduction to the book. In chapter 1 Charlotte Fabech presents a comprehensive study on the ‘rescue, musealisation and oblivion’ of the Sösdala and Fulltofta finds. Ulf Näsman deals with the research history of the Sösdala style in chapter 5, discussing chronology as well as its relation to Late Roman provincial art and the Nydam style. Anna Bitner-Wroblewska (chapter 12) prefers the concept ‘Sösdala horizon’ and incorporates ceremonial horse bridles, shieldshaped, bi-conical and pelta-shaped pendants and silver sheet brooches covered by an elaborate and varied stamped ornamentation, shallow chip-carving and niello inlay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norwegian Archaeological Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norwegian Archaeological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian Archaeological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2019.1669700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Søsdala Horsemen and the Equestrian Elite of Fifth Century Europe
Sösdala is no longer just a style – not after the publication of the three early fifth century, spectacular depositions Sösdala I–II and Fulltofta from the central part of Scania. The 17 chapters, followed by summary and captions in Russian, are written by 15 authors from five different countries. Extensive catalogues and illustrations support the text, and the high-quality photos invite us into the book. Informative reconstructions of bridles and saddles make the discussions of the many mounts easier to follow. The concluding chapter 17, written by the editors, works well as an introduction to the book. In chapter 1 Charlotte Fabech presents a comprehensive study on the ‘rescue, musealisation and oblivion’ of the Sösdala and Fulltofta finds. Ulf Näsman deals with the research history of the Sösdala style in chapter 5, discussing chronology as well as its relation to Late Roman provincial art and the Nydam style. Anna Bitner-Wroblewska (chapter 12) prefers the concept ‘Sösdala horizon’ and incorporates ceremonial horse bridles, shieldshaped, bi-conical and pelta-shaped pendants and silver sheet brooches covered by an elaborate and varied stamped ornamentation, shallow chip-carving and niello inlay.
期刊介绍:
Norwegian Archaeological Review published since 1968, aims to be an interface between archaeological research in the Nordic countries and global archaeological trends, a meeting ground for current discussion of theoretical and methodical problems on an international scientific level. The main focus is on the European area, but discussions based upon results from other parts of the world are also welcomed. The comments of specialists, along with the author"s reply, are given as an addendum to selected articles. The Journal is also receptive to uninvited opinions and comments on a wider scope of archaeological themes, e.g. articles in Norwegian Archaeological Review or other journals, monographies, conferences.