“拟”、“抄”、“加注”——从秦汉法律行政文书看“写”的语义场

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Bamboo and Silk Pub Date : 2019-04-09 DOI:10.1163/24689246-00202004

T. Staack

{"title":"“拟”、“抄”、“加注”——从秦汉法律行政文书看“写”的语义场","authors":"T. Staack","doi":"10.1163/24689246-00202004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper investigates three terms that were all used to refer to acts of writing in the early imperial administration: shu 書, xie 寫, and shu 署. Based on an analysis of their usage in administrative and legal texts, it illustrates the semantic differences of these terms, which also bear implications for our understanding of the production and use of administrative documents.","PeriodicalId":29844,"journal":{"name":"Bamboo and Silk","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24689246-00202004","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Drafting,” “Copying,” and “Adding Notes”: On the Semantic Field of “Writing” as Reflected by Qin and Early Han Legal and Administrative Documents\",\"authors\":\"T. Staack\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/24689246-00202004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper investigates three terms that were all used to refer to acts of writing in the early imperial administration: shu 書, xie 寫, and shu 署. Based on an analysis of their usage in administrative and legal texts, it illustrates the semantic differences of these terms, which also bear implications for our understanding of the production and use of administrative documents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bamboo and Silk\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/24689246-00202004\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bamboo and Silk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689246-00202004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bamboo and Silk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24689246-00202004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了早期朝廷中三个用来指代书写行为的术语：“书”書, 谢寫, 和舒署. 通过对行政文书和法律文书中这些术语的用法分析，说明了这些术语的语义差异，这也对我们理解行政文书的产生和使用具有启示意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Drafting,” “Copying,” and “Adding Notes”: On the Semantic Field of “Writing” as Reflected by Qin and Early Han Legal and Administrative Documents

The present paper investigates three terms that were all used to refer to acts of writing in the early imperial administration: shu 書, xie 寫, and shu 署. Based on an analysis of their usage in administrative and legal texts, it illustrates the semantic differences of these terms, which also bear implications for our understanding of the production and use of administrative documents.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Bamboo and Silk ASIAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量