中国青少年阅读参与状况及其与自我概念和阅读素养的关系

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xiaocheng Wang
{"title":"中国青少年阅读参与状况及其与自我概念和阅读素养的关系","authors":"Xiaocheng Wang","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Previous studies on reading engagement have generally used variable-centred approaches to examine whole-sample averages. Few have assumed a person-centred approach, especially latent profile analysis (LPA), to examine students' reading engagement profiles. Although one study employed LPA to identify the reading engagement profiles of Chinese adolescents, how engagement dimensions combine within individuals was not clear from its results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study used LPA to examine the reading engagement profiles of 12,058 Chinese adolescents based on their patterns of behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement. Additionally, how profile membership relates to self-concept and reading literacy was examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four reading engagement profiles were identified: <i>engaged</i> (moderate to high on all three dimensions), <i>moderately engaged</i> (moderate on all three dimensions), <i>disengaged</i> (low on all three dimensions) and <i>moderately cognitively engaged</i> (moderate cognitive engagement/low behavioural and emotional engagement). Students with a higher reading self-concept were more likely to exhibit a pattern of moderate to high engagement. Students with higher engagement patterns attained higher reading achievement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Chinese adolescents showed multiple reading engagement profiles that were differently related to self-concept and reading literacy. Teachers should be aware of subgroups of students displaying different reading engagement patterns and be able to evaluate and then address them with appropriate instructional practices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"46 4","pages":"333-357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chinese adolescents' reading engagement profiles and their relations to self-concept and reading literacy\",\"authors\":\"Xiaocheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9817.12431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Previous studies on reading engagement have generally used variable-centred approaches to examine whole-sample averages. Few have assumed a person-centred approach, especially latent profile analysis (LPA), to examine students' reading engagement profiles. Although one study employed LPA to identify the reading engagement profiles of Chinese adolescents, how engagement dimensions combine within individuals was not clear from its results.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study used LPA to examine the reading engagement profiles of 12,058 Chinese adolescents based on their patterns of behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement. Additionally, how profile membership relates to self-concept and reading literacy was examined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Four reading engagement profiles were identified: <i>engaged</i> (moderate to high on all three dimensions), <i>moderately engaged</i> (moderate on all three dimensions), <i>disengaged</i> (low on all three dimensions) and <i>moderately cognitively engaged</i> (moderate cognitive engagement/low behavioural and emotional engagement). Students with a higher reading self-concept were more likely to exhibit a pattern of moderate to high engagement. Students with higher engagement patterns attained higher reading achievement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Chinese adolescents showed multiple reading engagement profiles that were differently related to self-concept and reading literacy. Teachers should be aware of subgroups of students displaying different reading engagement patterns and be able to evaluate and then address them with appropriate instructional practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"333-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12431\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往关于阅读投入的研究通常采用以变量为中心的方法来检验全样本平均值。很少有人采用以人为本的方法,特别是潜在特征分析(LPA)来检查学生的阅读参与概况。虽然有一项研究采用LPA来识别中国青少年的阅读投入概况,但从结果来看,参与维度在个体内部是如何结合的并不清楚。方法采用LPA方法对12058名中国青少年的阅读投入行为、认知和情感投入模式进行分析。此外,本文还研究了概况成员与自我概念和阅读素养之间的关系。结果确定了四种阅读参与概况:参与(所有三个维度均为中等至高),中度参与(所有三个维度均为中等),不参与(所有三个维度均为低)和中度认知参与(中度认知参与/低行为和情感参与)。阅读自我概念高的学生更有可能表现出中度到高度投入的模式。参与模式越高的学生阅读成绩越高。结论中国青少年在自我概念和阅读素养方面表现出多种不同的阅读投入特征。教师应该意识到学生的子群体表现出不同的阅读参与模式,并能够评估,然后用适当的教学实践来解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chinese adolescents' reading engagement profiles and their relations to self-concept and reading literacy

Background

Previous studies on reading engagement have generally used variable-centred approaches to examine whole-sample averages. Few have assumed a person-centred approach, especially latent profile analysis (LPA), to examine students' reading engagement profiles. Although one study employed LPA to identify the reading engagement profiles of Chinese adolescents, how engagement dimensions combine within individuals was not clear from its results.

Methods

This study used LPA to examine the reading engagement profiles of 12,058 Chinese adolescents based on their patterns of behavioural, cognitive and emotional engagement. Additionally, how profile membership relates to self-concept and reading literacy was examined.

Results

Four reading engagement profiles were identified: engaged (moderate to high on all three dimensions), moderately engaged (moderate on all three dimensions), disengaged (low on all three dimensions) and moderately cognitively engaged (moderate cognitive engagement/low behavioural and emotional engagement). Students with a higher reading self-concept were more likely to exhibit a pattern of moderate to high engagement. Students with higher engagement patterns attained higher reading achievement.

Conclusions

Chinese adolescents showed multiple reading engagement profiles that were differently related to self-concept and reading literacy. Teachers should be aware of subgroups of students displaying different reading engagement patterns and be able to evaluate and then address them with appropriate instructional practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信