多自由度系统地震输入能量需求的强度测度

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
B. Ganjavi, A. Rezagholilou
{"title":"多自由度系统地震输入能量需求的强度测度","authors":"B. Ganjavi, A. Rezagholilou","doi":"10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to compute the maximum relative input energy per unit mass for 21 multi-degree-of-freedom systems (MDOF) with preselected target fundamental periods of vibration ranging from 0.2 to 4.0 s and 6 target inter-story ductility demands of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 subjected to 40 the earthquake ground motions. The efficiency of the several intensity measures as an index for damage potential of ground motion in MDOF systems are examined parametrically. To this end, the dispersion of normalized input energy by different intensity measures have been evaluated and compared. Results of this study show that using all intensity measures will result in a significant discrepancy in input energy spectra of MDOF systems, which are in most cases larger than 0.5 and even can take the value of 1.9 for some cases. This signifies that the evaluated intensity measures may not suitable for MDOF systems. A dimensionless intensity measure as a normalized energy index is proposed for MDOF systems subjected to far-fault earthquakes. It was demonstrated that the proposed normalized input energy values have smaller dispersion compared to those of the other indices for MDOF systems with all ranges of period and ductility ratio used.","PeriodicalId":43959,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intensity Measure for Seismic Input Energy Demand of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems\",\"authors\":\"B. Ganjavi, A. Rezagholilou\",\"doi\":\"10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to compute the maximum relative input energy per unit mass for 21 multi-degree-of-freedom systems (MDOF) with preselected target fundamental periods of vibration ranging from 0.2 to 4.0 s and 6 target inter-story ductility demands of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 subjected to 40 the earthquake ground motions. The efficiency of the several intensity measures as an index for damage potential of ground motion in MDOF systems are examined parametrically. To this end, the dispersion of normalized input energy by different intensity measures have been evaluated and compared. Results of this study show that using all intensity measures will result in a significant discrepancy in input energy spectra of MDOF systems, which are in most cases larger than 0.5 and even can take the value of 1.9 for some cases. This signifies that the evaluated intensity measures may not suitable for MDOF systems. A dimensionless intensity measure as a normalized energy index is proposed for MDOF systems subjected to far-fault earthquakes. It was demonstrated that the proposed normalized input energy values have smaller dispersion compared to those of the other indices for MDOF systems with all ranges of period and ductility ratio used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal-CEIJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7508/CEIJ.2018.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过非线性动力分析,计算了21个多自由度体系(MDOF)的最大单位质量相对输入能量,这些体系的目标基本振动周期为0.2 ~ 4.0 s,目标层间延性需求为1、2、3、4、6、8,分别受到40次地震地面运动的影响。对几种强度指标作为多自由度系统地震动损伤潜力指标的有效性进行了参数化检验。为此,对不同强度的归一化输入能量的色散进行了评价和比较。本研究结果表明,采用所有强度措施都会导致MDOF系统输入能谱差异较大,多数情况下大于0.5,有的情况下甚至可达1.9。这表明所评估的强度度量可能不适合多自由度系统。提出了一种用于多自由度系统在远断层地震作用下的无量纲强度度量作为归一化能量指标。结果表明,在所有周期和延性比范围内,与其他指标相比,所提出的归一化输入能量值具有较小的色散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Intensity Measure for Seismic Input Energy Demand of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems
Nonlinear dynamic analyses are performed to compute the maximum relative input energy per unit mass for 21 multi-degree-of-freedom systems (MDOF) with preselected target fundamental periods of vibration ranging from 0.2 to 4.0 s and 6 target inter-story ductility demands of 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 subjected to 40 the earthquake ground motions. The efficiency of the several intensity measures as an index for damage potential of ground motion in MDOF systems are examined parametrically. To this end, the dispersion of normalized input energy by different intensity measures have been evaluated and compared. Results of this study show that using all intensity measures will result in a significant discrepancy in input energy spectra of MDOF systems, which are in most cases larger than 0.5 and even can take the value of 1.9 for some cases. This signifies that the evaluated intensity measures may not suitable for MDOF systems. A dimensionless intensity measure as a normalized energy index is proposed for MDOF systems subjected to far-fault earthquakes. It was demonstrated that the proposed normalized input energy values have smaller dispersion compared to those of the other indices for MDOF systems with all ranges of period and ductility ratio used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
60.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信