H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani
{"title":"商品肉鸡与地方鸡F2杂交体质量性状的基因组评价","authors":"H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani","doi":"10.2478/aspr-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.","PeriodicalId":50791,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Papers and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genomic evaluation of body weight traits in a F2 mixture of commercial broiler and native chicken\",\"authors\":\"H. Asadollahi, S. A. Mahyari, R. Torshizi, H. Emrani, A. Ehsani\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/aspr-2023-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Science Papers and Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Science Papers and Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/aspr-2023-0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Papers and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/aspr-2023-0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Genomic evaluation of body weight traits in a F2 mixture of commercial broiler and native chicken
Abstract Genetic improvement of body weight (BW) traits has received major consideration in the poultry industry due to their economic and environmental implications. With the rapid implementation of genomic selection (GS) in the poultry industry and a decrease in the cost of genotyping, genomic prediction (GP) is a feasible way to increase productivity. Moreover, a pre-selection of SNPs could represent a reasonable option to speed up GP. We used 312 F2 broiler chicken genotyped with 60K Illumina Beadchip to investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities on accuracy and bias of prediction using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) for BW at 2-4 weeks of age (488 chickens). To investigate the effect of reduced SNP densities by varying minor allele frequency (MAF), SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF of 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4 and 0.4-0.5. The accuracy and bias of genomic predictions from different MAF bins were compared to that using a standard array of 60k SNP genotypes and the traditional BLUP method. Our study showed that using a subset of common SNPs genotypes may increase accuracy of genomic predictions compared to using all SNPs, specifically in the studied F2 population with a limited number of genotyped/phenotyped individuals.
期刊介绍:
ANIMAL SCIENCE PAPERS AND REPORTS (Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep.) is an English language quarterly published by the Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzębiec. Papers are welcome reporting studies in all aspects of animal breeding and genetics, reproduction, animal biotechnology, physiology, ethology and welfare. Critical review papers and short reports will also be considered and in justified cases also other original articles dealing with animal science and production.