皮肤镜图像中基于生长切口的黑色素瘤全自动分割

Leyton Ho
{"title":"皮肤镜图像中基于生长切口的黑色素瘤全自动分割","authors":"Leyton Ho","doi":"10.22186/JYI.36.2.11-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, diagnosis of melanoma is done primarily by biopsy, an invasive and costly procedure (American Cancer Society, 2017). A new technique called dermoscopy has been proposed as a pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation tool that can be applied by a wide range of physicians, including family practice doctors (Herschorn, 2012). Dermoscopy is a non-invasive method that uses microscopes to amplify details of skin lesion photographs, such as the colors and microstructures of the skin, the dermoepidermal junction (the area of tissue joining the epidermal and dermal layers of skin), and the papillary dermis (uppermost layer of the dermis). Compared to inspection of cutaneous lesions by the naked eye, this method can increase physicians’ confidence in their referral accuracy to dermatologists thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies. The early phases of malignant melanoma, however, share many clinical features with atypical or unusual looking non-malignant moles, also known as dysplastic nevi. As a result, diagnostic accuracy has been shown to range between 50-75% (Stanganelli, 2017). A commonly used standard for pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation is described by the ABCDE rule (Abbasi et al., 2004). This rule defines five common characteristics of malignant lesions: asymmetry (A), border irregularity (B), multiple colors (C), diameter greater than six millimeters (D), and enlargement (E). By looking for these five characteristics in dermoscopic images, physicians can evaluate the risks of malignancy of the lesions. Such evaluation, however, is inherently imperfect due to differences in human interpretation of the lesions. To enable faster, more accessible, and more effective evaluation of melanoma risks, there is a need for automatic computerized processing of skin lesions. The Fully Automated GrowCut-based Segmentation of Melanoma in Dermoscopic Images","PeriodicalId":74021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of young investigators","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ully Automated GrowCut-based Segmentation of Melanoma in Dermoscopic Images\",\"authors\":\"Leyton Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.22186/JYI.36.2.11-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, diagnosis of melanoma is done primarily by biopsy, an invasive and costly procedure (American Cancer Society, 2017). A new technique called dermoscopy has been proposed as a pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation tool that can be applied by a wide range of physicians, including family practice doctors (Herschorn, 2012). Dermoscopy is a non-invasive method that uses microscopes to amplify details of skin lesion photographs, such as the colors and microstructures of the skin, the dermoepidermal junction (the area of tissue joining the epidermal and dermal layers of skin), and the papillary dermis (uppermost layer of the dermis). Compared to inspection of cutaneous lesions by the naked eye, this method can increase physicians’ confidence in their referral accuracy to dermatologists thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies. The early phases of malignant melanoma, however, share many clinical features with atypical or unusual looking non-malignant moles, also known as dysplastic nevi. As a result, diagnostic accuracy has been shown to range between 50-75% (Stanganelli, 2017). A commonly used standard for pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation is described by the ABCDE rule (Abbasi et al., 2004). This rule defines five common characteristics of malignant lesions: asymmetry (A), border irregularity (B), multiple colors (C), diameter greater than six millimeters (D), and enlargement (E). By looking for these five characteristics in dermoscopic images, physicians can evaluate the risks of malignancy of the lesions. Such evaluation, however, is inherently imperfect due to differences in human interpretation of the lesions. To enable faster, more accessible, and more effective evaluation of melanoma risks, there is a need for automatic computerized processing of skin lesions. The Fully Automated GrowCut-based Segmentation of Melanoma in Dermoscopic Images\",\"PeriodicalId\":74021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of young investigators\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of young investigators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22186/JYI.36.2.11-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of young investigators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22186/JYI.36.2.11-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目前,黑色素瘤的诊断主要通过活检进行,这是一种侵入性且成本高昂的手术(美国癌症协会,2017)。一种名为皮肤镜检查的新技术已被提出作为活检前黑色素瘤风险评估工具,可被包括家庭医生在内的广泛医生应用(Herschorn,2012)。皮肤镜是一种非侵入性方法,使用显微镜放大皮肤损伤照片的细节,如皮肤的颜色和微观结构、皮-皮交界处(连接皮肤表皮和真皮层的组织区域)和乳头状真皮(真皮的最上层)。与肉眼检查皮肤病变相比,这种方法可以提高医生对皮肤科医生转诊准确性的信心,从而减少不必要的活检。然而,恶性黑色素瘤的早期阶段与非典型或不寻常的非恶性痣(也称为发育异常痣)有许多共同的临床特征。因此,诊断准确率已被证明在50-75%之间(Stanganelli,2017)。ABCDE规则描述了活检前黑色素瘤风险评估的常用标准(Abbasi等人,2004)。该规则定义了恶性病变的五个常见特征:不对称(A)、边界不规则(B)、多种颜色(C)、直径大于6毫米(D)和增大(E)。通过在皮肤镜图像中寻找这五个特征,医生可以评估病变的恶性风险。然而,由于人类对病变的解释存在差异,这种评估本质上是不完美的。为了能够更快、更容易、更有效地评估黑色素瘤风险,需要对皮肤损伤进行自动计算机处理。基于GrowCut的全自动皮肤黑色素瘤分割
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ully Automated GrowCut-based Segmentation of Melanoma in Dermoscopic Images
Currently, diagnosis of melanoma is done primarily by biopsy, an invasive and costly procedure (American Cancer Society, 2017). A new technique called dermoscopy has been proposed as a pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation tool that can be applied by a wide range of physicians, including family practice doctors (Herschorn, 2012). Dermoscopy is a non-invasive method that uses microscopes to amplify details of skin lesion photographs, such as the colors and microstructures of the skin, the dermoepidermal junction (the area of tissue joining the epidermal and dermal layers of skin), and the papillary dermis (uppermost layer of the dermis). Compared to inspection of cutaneous lesions by the naked eye, this method can increase physicians’ confidence in their referral accuracy to dermatologists thereby reducing unnecessary biopsies. The early phases of malignant melanoma, however, share many clinical features with atypical or unusual looking non-malignant moles, also known as dysplastic nevi. As a result, diagnostic accuracy has been shown to range between 50-75% (Stanganelli, 2017). A commonly used standard for pre-biopsy melanoma risk evaluation is described by the ABCDE rule (Abbasi et al., 2004). This rule defines five common characteristics of malignant lesions: asymmetry (A), border irregularity (B), multiple colors (C), diameter greater than six millimeters (D), and enlargement (E). By looking for these five characteristics in dermoscopic images, physicians can evaluate the risks of malignancy of the lesions. Such evaluation, however, is inherently imperfect due to differences in human interpretation of the lesions. To enable faster, more accessible, and more effective evaluation of melanoma risks, there is a need for automatic computerized processing of skin lesions. The Fully Automated GrowCut-based Segmentation of Melanoma in Dermoscopic Images
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信