妊娠早期蛋白尿试纸试验预测先兆子痫模型

IF 0.4 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
H. Ohseto, M. Ishikuro, T. Obara, K. Murakami, T. Onuma, A. Noda, F. Ueno, N. Iwama, M. Kikuya, H. Metoki, J. Sugawara, S. Kuriyama
{"title":"妊娠早期蛋白尿试纸试验预测先兆子痫模型","authors":"H. Ohseto, M. Ishikuro, T. Obara, K. Murakami, T. Onuma, A. Noda, F. Ueno, N. Iwama, M. Kikuya, H. Metoki, J. Sugawara, S. Kuriyama","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-887730/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to develop prediction model for preeclampsia (PE) using routinely examined items in early pregnancy especially dipstick test for proteinuria.MethodThe Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study recruited pregnant women and we included 9,086 of them in analysis. Maternal basic characteristics were obtained by self-report, and blood pressure and dipstick test of proteinuria were obtained by medical record at regular antenatal care. The outcome was defined as PE including superimposed preeclampsia. We developed prediction model without dipstick test of proteinuria (model 1) and model with it (model 2), and we compared them by the mean of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (mAUROC) using five-fold cross validation.ResultsmAUROC of model 1 was 0.769 (95% CI; 0.741 to 0.797) and that of model 2 was 0.785 (95% CI; 0.758 to 0.812). The difference of two mAUROCs was 0.016 (95% CI; 0.004 to 0.028). In model 2, detection rates at false-positive rate of 5%, 10% and 20% were 40%, 49% and 64%, respectively.ConclusionsWe could develop prediction model for PE using routine antenatal care items and it was improved by including dipstick test for proteinuria.","PeriodicalId":42505,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preeclampsia prediction model using the dipstick test for proteinuria during early gestation\",\"authors\":\"H. Ohseto, M. Ishikuro, T. Obara, K. Murakami, T. Onuma, A. Noda, F. Ueno, N. Iwama, M. Kikuya, H. Metoki, J. Sugawara, S. Kuriyama\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-887730/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to develop prediction model for preeclampsia (PE) using routinely examined items in early pregnancy especially dipstick test for proteinuria.MethodThe Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study recruited pregnant women and we included 9,086 of them in analysis. Maternal basic characteristics were obtained by self-report, and blood pressure and dipstick test of proteinuria were obtained by medical record at regular antenatal care. The outcome was defined as PE including superimposed preeclampsia. We developed prediction model without dipstick test of proteinuria (model 1) and model with it (model 2), and we compared them by the mean of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (mAUROC) using five-fold cross validation.ResultsmAUROC of model 1 was 0.769 (95% CI; 0.741 to 0.797) and that of model 2 was 0.785 (95% CI; 0.758 to 0.812). The difference of two mAUROCs was 0.016 (95% CI; 0.004 to 0.028). In model 2, detection rates at false-positive rate of 5%, 10% and 20% were 40%, 49% and 64%, respectively.ConclusionsWe could develop prediction model for PE using routine antenatal care items and it was improved by including dipstick test for proteinuria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-887730/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension Research in Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-887730/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是利用妊娠早期的常规检查项目,特别是蛋白尿试纸测试,建立先兆子痫(PE)的预测模型。方法东北医疗大银行计划生育和三代队列研究招募孕妇,我们将9086名孕妇纳入分析。母亲的基本特征通过自我报告获得,血压和蛋白尿试纸测试通过定期产前护理的病历获得。结果被定义为PE,包括叠加先兆子痫。我们开发了无蛋白尿试纸测试的预测模型(模型1)和有蛋白尿试纸的模型(模型2),并使用五倍交叉验证通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积的平均值(mAUROC)对它们进行了比较。结果模型1的mAUROC为0.769(95%CI;0.741至0.797),模型2的mAUROC=0.785(95%CI:0.758至0.812),两种mAUROC的差异为0.016(95%CI,0.004至0.028),模型2中假阳性率分别为5%、10%和20%的检出率分别为40%、49%和64%。结论我们可以利用常规的产前护理项目建立PE的预测模型,并通过包括蛋白尿试纸测试来改进该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preeclampsia prediction model using the dipstick test for proteinuria during early gestation
ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to develop prediction model for preeclampsia (PE) using routinely examined items in early pregnancy especially dipstick test for proteinuria.MethodThe Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study recruited pregnant women and we included 9,086 of them in analysis. Maternal basic characteristics were obtained by self-report, and blood pressure and dipstick test of proteinuria were obtained by medical record at regular antenatal care. The outcome was defined as PE including superimposed preeclampsia. We developed prediction model without dipstick test of proteinuria (model 1) and model with it (model 2), and we compared them by the mean of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (mAUROC) using five-fold cross validation.ResultsmAUROC of model 1 was 0.769 (95% CI; 0.741 to 0.797) and that of model 2 was 0.785 (95% CI; 0.758 to 0.812). The difference of two mAUROCs was 0.016 (95% CI; 0.004 to 0.028). In model 2, detection rates at false-positive rate of 5%, 10% and 20% were 40%, 49% and 64%, respectively.ConclusionsWe could develop prediction model for PE using routine antenatal care items and it was improved by including dipstick test for proteinuria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy
Hypertension Research in Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信