两种教育方法(面对面和远程)对Behvarz自理能力影响的调查

Mahboobeh Moftakhar, A. Emadzadeh, M. Yavari, H. Bahrami-Taghanaki
{"title":"两种教育方法(面对面和远程)对Behvarz自理能力影响的调查","authors":"Mahboobeh Moftakhar, A. Emadzadeh, M. Yavari, H. Bahrami-Taghanaki","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2020.44887.1303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: With increase in the number of patients with chronic illnesses, long-term health care systems are experiencing significant problems in providing these services. Therefore, in order to organize these patients and facilitate the work, it is suggested that some care be provided by the individuals themselves. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of face to face and distance education on self-care.Methods: Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire. The statistical population of the study consisted of Bahvarzes of two cities: Khaf and Sarakhs. According to population size and based on Cochran formula, 45 Bahvarzes were randomly selected from khaf and Sarakh health centers as the statistical sample. The intervention of face-to-face training in Sarakhs health center and intervention of distance education in Khaf Health Center were used. Data was analyzed through SPSS 24 software.Results: Based on the results of paired t-test, it was found that face to face training intervention was effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of Sarakhs city (p-value = 0.001). But self-care distance education intervention has not been effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of khaf city (p-value=0.1). Also the results of comparing the mean of two methods of face to face and distance training showed that there was a significant difference between the scores mean of Behvarz in the two methods (p-value = 0.001) and the face to face training intervention was more effective than distance training intervention.Conclusion: Self-care face to face training of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz is more effective than distance training.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"45-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey on the effect of two education methods (face to face and distance) on the self-care skill of Behvarz\",\"authors\":\"Mahboobeh Moftakhar, A. Emadzadeh, M. Yavari, H. Bahrami-Taghanaki\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/FMEJ.2020.44887.1303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: With increase in the number of patients with chronic illnesses, long-term health care systems are experiencing significant problems in providing these services. Therefore, in order to organize these patients and facilitate the work, it is suggested that some care be provided by the individuals themselves. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of face to face and distance education on self-care.Methods: Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire. The statistical population of the study consisted of Bahvarzes of two cities: Khaf and Sarakhs. According to population size and based on Cochran formula, 45 Bahvarzes were randomly selected from khaf and Sarakh health centers as the statistical sample. The intervention of face-to-face training in Sarakhs health center and intervention of distance education in Khaf Health Center were used. Data was analyzed through SPSS 24 software.Results: Based on the results of paired t-test, it was found that face to face training intervention was effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of Sarakhs city (p-value = 0.001). But self-care distance education intervention has not been effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of khaf city (p-value=0.1). Also the results of comparing the mean of two methods of face to face and distance training showed that there was a significant difference between the scores mean of Behvarz in the two methods (p-value = 0.001) and the face to face training intervention was more effective than distance training intervention.Conclusion: Self-care face to face training of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz is more effective than distance training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"45-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future of Medical Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2020.44887.1303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2020.44887.1303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着慢性病患者数量的增加,长期卫生保健系统在提供这些服务方面遇到了重大问题。因此,为了组织这些患者,促进工作,建议由个人自己提供一些护理。本研究旨在探讨面对面教育和远程教育对自我护理的影响。方法:采用问卷调查法收集资料。该研究的统计人口包括两个城市的巴林人:卡夫和萨拉克斯。根据人口规模,根据Cochran公式,从khaf和Sarakh卫生中心随机抽取45名Bahvarzes作为统计样本。采用Sarakhs保健中心的面对面培训干预和Khaf保健中心的远程教育干预。数据分析采用SPSS 24软件。结果:配对t检验结果显示,面对面培训干预对Sarakhs市Behvarz非传染性疾病患者自我护理有显著效果(p值= 0.001)。但自我保健远程教育干预对哈夫市Behvarz地区非传染性疾病患者的自我保健效果不显著(p值=0.1)。面对面训练与远程训练两种方法的均数比较结果显示,两种方法的Behvarz得分均数差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.001),面对面训练干预比远程训练干预更有效。结论:贝瓦尔茨地区非传染性疾病自我保健面对面培训比远程培训效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey on the effect of two education methods (face to face and distance) on the self-care skill of Behvarz
Background: With increase in the number of patients with chronic illnesses, long-term health care systems are experiencing significant problems in providing these services. Therefore, in order to organize these patients and facilitate the work, it is suggested that some care be provided by the individuals themselves. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of face to face and distance education on self-care.Methods: Data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire. The statistical population of the study consisted of Bahvarzes of two cities: Khaf and Sarakhs. According to population size and based on Cochran formula, 45 Bahvarzes were randomly selected from khaf and Sarakh health centers as the statistical sample. The intervention of face-to-face training in Sarakhs health center and intervention of distance education in Khaf Health Center were used. Data was analyzed through SPSS 24 software.Results: Based on the results of paired t-test, it was found that face to face training intervention was effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of Sarakhs city (p-value = 0.001). But self-care distance education intervention has not been effective on self-care of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz of khaf city (p-value=0.1). Also the results of comparing the mean of two methods of face to face and distance training showed that there was a significant difference between the scores mean of Behvarz in the two methods (p-value = 0.001) and the face to face training intervention was more effective than distance training intervention.Conclusion: Self-care face to face training of non-communicable diseases in Behvarz is more effective than distance training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信