约旦脑卒中后幸存者的生活质量:一项前瞻性研究

Q3 Nursing
M. N. Alhalabi, Salam H. Bani Hani
{"title":"约旦脑卒中后幸存者的生活质量:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"M. N. Alhalabi, Salam H. Bani Hani","doi":"10.1108/wwop-08-2022-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess the quality of life (QOL) and the related factors in patients post-stroke in Jordan.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nProspective, the cross-sectional study recruited 100 participants with stroke from three public hospitals from December 1, 2021 to February 1, 2022. Patients with stroke were interviewed to fill the stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire.\n\n\nFindings\nForty-five per cent of the participants were male. More than half of the participants (53%) were married, and the average age of the participants was 63.6 (SD =3.8). Most of the participants had an ischemic stroke (86%) with an affected left side (65%). The overall QOL of the participants was leveling at (M = 123.5, SD = 45.2), which is a moderate level. It was found statistical significance differences among participants according to gender, type of stroke, affected side and presence of comorbidities (Table 1).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThere were some limitations in this study. First, this study was based on mild to moderate Jordanian stroke survivors and did not include critically ill stroke survivors; the QOL critically ill stroke survivors may differ, which could affect the generalizability of data among all stroke survivors. Second, this study is prospective, and this type of study is prone to bias that could influence the reliability of the results. It is recommended to conduct a mixed-method study to reveal an in-depth understanding of the associated factors with QOL, to ensure reliability and to reflect a better view of the Jordanian population.\n\n\nPractical implications\nTo sum up, there is a reduction in the level of QOL among stroke survivors; hence, it is crucial to focus on detecting factors contributing to reducing the QOL and taking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke, and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being for survivors of stroke.\n\n\nSocial implications\nTaking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being of survivors of stroke.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings of this study bring a strong insight toward assessing the main factors indicating a decrease QOL among stroke survivors.\n","PeriodicalId":53659,"journal":{"name":"Working with Older People","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life among post-stroke Jordanian survivors: a prospective study\",\"authors\":\"M. N. Alhalabi, Salam H. Bani Hani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/wwop-08-2022-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to assess the quality of life (QOL) and the related factors in patients post-stroke in Jordan.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nProspective, the cross-sectional study recruited 100 participants with stroke from three public hospitals from December 1, 2021 to February 1, 2022. Patients with stroke were interviewed to fill the stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nForty-five per cent of the participants were male. More than half of the participants (53%) were married, and the average age of the participants was 63.6 (SD =3.8). Most of the participants had an ischemic stroke (86%) with an affected left side (65%). The overall QOL of the participants was leveling at (M = 123.5, SD = 45.2), which is a moderate level. It was found statistical significance differences among participants according to gender, type of stroke, affected side and presence of comorbidities (Table 1).\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThere were some limitations in this study. First, this study was based on mild to moderate Jordanian stroke survivors and did not include critically ill stroke survivors; the QOL critically ill stroke survivors may differ, which could affect the generalizability of data among all stroke survivors. Second, this study is prospective, and this type of study is prone to bias that could influence the reliability of the results. It is recommended to conduct a mixed-method study to reveal an in-depth understanding of the associated factors with QOL, to ensure reliability and to reflect a better view of the Jordanian population.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nTo sum up, there is a reduction in the level of QOL among stroke survivors; hence, it is crucial to focus on detecting factors contributing to reducing the QOL and taking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke, and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being for survivors of stroke.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nTaking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being of survivors of stroke.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe findings of this study bring a strong insight toward assessing the main factors indicating a decrease QOL among stroke survivors.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Working with Older People\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Working with Older People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-08-2022-0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working with Older People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-08-2022-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估约旦卒中后患者的生活质量(QOL)及其相关因素。设计/方法/方法前瞻性,该横断面研究从2021年12月1日至2022年2月1日从三家公立医院招募了100名卒中患者。对脑卒中患者进行访谈,填写针对脑卒中的生活质量问卷。调查结果45%的参与者是男性。超过一半的参与者(53%)已婚,参与者的平均年龄为63.6岁(SD=3.8)。大多数参与者患有缺血性中风(86%),左侧受影响(65%)。参与者的总体生活质量平均为(M=123.5,SD=45.2),这是一个中等水平。研究发现,根据性别、中风类型、患侧和合并症的存在,参与者之间存在统计学显著性差异(表1)。研究局限性/含义本研究存在一些局限性。首先,这项研究基于约旦轻度至中度中风幸存者,不包括危重中风幸存者;危重脑卒中幸存者的生活质量可能不同,这可能影响所有脑卒中幸存者数据的可推广性。其次,这项研究是前瞻性的,这类研究容易产生偏见,可能会影响结果的可靠性。建议进行一项混合方法研究,以深入了解生活质量的相关因素,确保可靠性,并更好地反映约旦人口的情况。实践意义总之,脑卒中幸存者的生活质量水平有所下降;因此,重点检测有助于降低生活质量的因素,并考虑性别、中风类型和地点以及合并症之间的个体差异,制定提高中风幸存者生活质量和幸福感的治疗计划至关重要。社会影响考虑性别、中风类型和地点以及合并症之间的个体差异,制定提高中风幸存者生活质量和幸福感的治疗计划。独创性/价值本研究的发现为评估中风幸存者生活质量下降的主要因素提供了强有力的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of life among post-stroke Jordanian survivors: a prospective study
Purpose This study aims to assess the quality of life (QOL) and the related factors in patients post-stroke in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach Prospective, the cross-sectional study recruited 100 participants with stroke from three public hospitals from December 1, 2021 to February 1, 2022. Patients with stroke were interviewed to fill the stroke-specific quality of life questionnaire. Findings Forty-five per cent of the participants were male. More than half of the participants (53%) were married, and the average age of the participants was 63.6 (SD =3.8). Most of the participants had an ischemic stroke (86%) with an affected left side (65%). The overall QOL of the participants was leveling at (M = 123.5, SD = 45.2), which is a moderate level. It was found statistical significance differences among participants according to gender, type of stroke, affected side and presence of comorbidities (Table 1). Research limitations/implications There were some limitations in this study. First, this study was based on mild to moderate Jordanian stroke survivors and did not include critically ill stroke survivors; the QOL critically ill stroke survivors may differ, which could affect the generalizability of data among all stroke survivors. Second, this study is prospective, and this type of study is prone to bias that could influence the reliability of the results. It is recommended to conduct a mixed-method study to reveal an in-depth understanding of the associated factors with QOL, to ensure reliability and to reflect a better view of the Jordanian population. Practical implications To sum up, there is a reduction in the level of QOL among stroke survivors; hence, it is crucial to focus on detecting factors contributing to reducing the QOL and taking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke, and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being for survivors of stroke. Social implications Taking individual differences between sexes, type and location of the stroke and comorbidities into consideration to develop a treatment plan that enhances the QOL and well-being of survivors of stroke. Originality/value The findings of this study bring a strong insight toward assessing the main factors indicating a decrease QOL among stroke survivors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Working with Older People
Working with Older People Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信