{"title":"高等教育领域学者与实践者的关系之争","authors":"Danica Fink-Hafner, T. Dagen","doi":"10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In this article we present findings from focus\ngroups (FGs) consisting of academics and practitioners in\nthe higher education (HE) field from different parts of the\nworld, who debated their perceptions of the current state\nof the art in the HE field. The main findings, which call for\nfurther research, as well as activities of academics, practitioners\nand policymakers at various levels, are as follows: 1)\nthere is a gap between basic academic research and applied\nresearch (with the latter often not meeting the appropriate\nconceptual level), which needs to be closed; 2) this gap is\nexpressed also in the global context of the HE field; 3) multidisciplinarity,\ninterdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, methodological\nquality of both basic and applied research need\nto be developed and 4) scholars’, practitioners’ and governments’\n(policymakers’) responsibilities need to be addressed.\nKeywords: higher education (HE), research, academics,\npractitioners, government, policy","PeriodicalId":44389,"journal":{"name":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEBATING THE RELATIONSHIP\\nBETWEEN ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS IN THE HIGHER\\nEDUCATION FIELD\",\"authors\":\"Danica Fink-Hafner, T. Dagen\",\"doi\":\"10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. In this article we present findings from focus\\ngroups (FGs) consisting of academics and practitioners in\\nthe higher education (HE) field from different parts of the\\nworld, who debated their perceptions of the current state\\nof the art in the HE field. The main findings, which call for\\nfurther research, as well as activities of academics, practitioners\\nand policymakers at various levels, are as follows: 1)\\nthere is a gap between basic academic research and applied\\nresearch (with the latter often not meeting the appropriate\\nconceptual level), which needs to be closed; 2) this gap is\\nexpressed also in the global context of the HE field; 3) multidisciplinarity,\\ninterdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, methodological\\nquality of both basic and applied research need\\nto be developed and 4) scholars’, practitioners’ and governments’\\n(policymakers’) responsibilities need to be addressed.\\nKeywords: higher education (HE), research, academics,\\npractitioners, government, policy\",\"PeriodicalId\":44389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEORIJA IN PRAKSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51936/tip.59.1.5-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
DEBATING THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN ACADEMICS AND PRACTITIONERS IN THE HIGHER
EDUCATION FIELD
Abstract. In this article we present findings from focus
groups (FGs) consisting of academics and practitioners in
the higher education (HE) field from different parts of the
world, who debated their perceptions of the current state
of the art in the HE field. The main findings, which call for
further research, as well as activities of academics, practitioners
and policymakers at various levels, are as follows: 1)
there is a gap between basic academic research and applied
research (with the latter often not meeting the appropriate
conceptual level), which needs to be closed; 2) this gap is
expressed also in the global context of the HE field; 3) multidisciplinarity,
interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, methodological
quality of both basic and applied research need
to be developed and 4) scholars’, practitioners’ and governments’
(policymakers’) responsibilities need to be addressed.
Keywords: higher education (HE), research, academics,
practitioners, government, policy