{"title":"储备金利息、银行挤兑和投资决策","authors":"Zhanhai Wang","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions.\n\n\nFindings\nIn the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLittle research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest on reserves, bank runs and investment decisions\",\"authors\":\"Zhanhai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIn the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nLittle research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的在理论框架下研究准备金利率对银行行为的影响。本文将IOR引入Cooper and Ross(1998)和Cooper and Ross(2002),并进行定量分析。在不同的假设条件下,研究了IOR对银行资源配置决策的影响。在没有存款保险的模型中,本文的研究结果表明,支付IOR有利于银行使用防挤兑合同。当采用挤兑接纳合同时,在一定条件下,银行对持有非流动性资产和持有超额流动性准备金是无所谓的。在有存款保险的模型中,结果表明,如果无风险的非流动性投资是有利可图的,那么支付IOR几乎不会影响银行的资源配置。如果无风险的非流动性投资是有限的,那么一定水平的IOR可以实现一些货币目标。独创性/价值很少有研究将IOR与银行挤兑模型结合起来。这有助于拓展这一视角下的理论分析。
Interest on reserves, bank runs and investment decisions
Purpose
This paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions.
Findings
In the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets.
Originality/value
Little research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.