储备金利息、银行挤兑和投资决策

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Zhanhai Wang
{"title":"储备金利息、银行挤兑和投资决策","authors":"Zhanhai Wang","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions.\n\n\nFindings\nIn the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nLittle research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest on reserves, bank runs and investment decisions\",\"authors\":\"Zhanhai Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nIn the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nLittle research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-04-2021-0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在理论框架下研究准备金利率对银行行为的影响。本文将IOR引入Cooper and Ross(1998)和Cooper and Ross(2002),并进行定量分析。在不同的假设条件下,研究了IOR对银行资源配置决策的影响。在没有存款保险的模型中,本文的研究结果表明,支付IOR有利于银行使用防挤兑合同。当采用挤兑接纳合同时,在一定条件下,银行对持有非流动性资产和持有超额流动性准备金是无所谓的。在有存款保险的模型中,结果表明,如果无风险的非流动性投资是有利可图的,那么支付IOR几乎不会影响银行的资源配置。如果无风险的非流动性投资是有限的,那么一定水平的IOR可以实现一些货币目标。独创性/价值很少有研究将IOR与银行挤兑模型结合起来。这有助于拓展这一视角下的理论分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interest on reserves, bank runs and investment decisions
Purpose This paper aims to study the effects of interest on reserves (IOR) on banks’ behavior in a theoretical framework. Design/methodology/approach This paper introduces IOR into both Cooper and Ross (1998) and Cooper and Ross (2002) and conducts quantitative analysis. It thoroughly examines the effects of IOR on banks’ resource allocation decisions under different assumptions. Findings In the model without deposit insurance, the results of this paper show that paying IOR facilitates the bank to use the run-proof contract. When the run-admitting contract is adopted, there is a set of conditions under which the bank is indifferent between holding illiquid asset and excess liquid reserves. In the model with deposit insurance, the results show that if the riskless illiquid investment is profitable and available, then paying IOR can hardly influence the bank's resource allocation. If the riskless illiquid investment is limited, then a certain level of IOR could fulfill some monetary targets. Originality/value Little research has combined IOR and model of bank runs. It helps to extend the theoretical analysis in this perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信