Khadija El Alaoui, M. Pilotti, H. Mulhem, Ebtesam Ahmad Tallouzi, Mona Mohammed Abdullah Al Mqbas
{"title":"语言和文化取向在双语女性内疚和羞耻中的作用","authors":"Khadija El Alaoui, M. Pilotti, H. Mulhem, Ebtesam Ahmad Tallouzi, Mona Mohammed Abdullah Al Mqbas","doi":"10.3998/JMMH.10381607.0011.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present experiment, we asked two interrelated questions: (a) whether the dominant cultural orientation of bilingual female speakers (collectivism versus individualism), as promoted by the language currently in use (Arabic versus English), would lead respondents to treat guilt and shame as distinct or largely similar emotions; and (b) whether the affective profiles of guilt and shame would replicate or diverge from those attributed by the existing literature to members of individualistic cultures whose primary language is English. In the experiment, bilingual female speakers (n = 182) completed a measure of cultural selforientation, recalled an experience of either guilt or shame, and then rated the emotion recalled on descriptive scales. They accomplished these tasks by relying on either English or Arabic. Although the two emotions were narrowly differentiated, shame was found to be more dominant than guilt. Shame also yielded a greater focus on oneself. Contrary to the expectation of higher emotionality for the first language 18 Khadija Alaoui, Maura Pilotti, Huda Mulhem, Ebtesam Tallouzi, and Mona Mqbas (Arabic), language differences mostly underlined differences in participants’ focus of attention, either others or oneself. These findings are compared with those reported in the crosscultural literature, and implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":44870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muslim Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Language and Cultural Orientation in Guilt and Shame Experienced by Bilingual Female Speakers\",\"authors\":\"Khadija El Alaoui, M. Pilotti, H. Mulhem, Ebtesam Ahmad Tallouzi, Mona Mohammed Abdullah Al Mqbas\",\"doi\":\"10.3998/JMMH.10381607.0011.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present experiment, we asked two interrelated questions: (a) whether the dominant cultural orientation of bilingual female speakers (collectivism versus individualism), as promoted by the language currently in use (Arabic versus English), would lead respondents to treat guilt and shame as distinct or largely similar emotions; and (b) whether the affective profiles of guilt and shame would replicate or diverge from those attributed by the existing literature to members of individualistic cultures whose primary language is English. In the experiment, bilingual female speakers (n = 182) completed a measure of cultural selforientation, recalled an experience of either guilt or shame, and then rated the emotion recalled on descriptive scales. They accomplished these tasks by relying on either English or Arabic. Although the two emotions were narrowly differentiated, shame was found to be more dominant than guilt. Shame also yielded a greater focus on oneself. Contrary to the expectation of higher emotionality for the first language 18 Khadija Alaoui, Maura Pilotti, Huda Mulhem, Ebtesam Tallouzi, and Mona Mqbas (Arabic), language differences mostly underlined differences in participants’ focus of attention, either others or oneself. These findings are compared with those reported in the crosscultural literature, and implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Muslim Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Muslim Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3998/JMMH.10381607.0011.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muslim Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3998/JMMH.10381607.0011.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Role of Language and Cultural Orientation in Guilt and Shame Experienced by Bilingual Female Speakers
In the present experiment, we asked two interrelated questions: (a) whether the dominant cultural orientation of bilingual female speakers (collectivism versus individualism), as promoted by the language currently in use (Arabic versus English), would lead respondents to treat guilt and shame as distinct or largely similar emotions; and (b) whether the affective profiles of guilt and shame would replicate or diverge from those attributed by the existing literature to members of individualistic cultures whose primary language is English. In the experiment, bilingual female speakers (n = 182) completed a measure of cultural selforientation, recalled an experience of either guilt or shame, and then rated the emotion recalled on descriptive scales. They accomplished these tasks by relying on either English or Arabic. Although the two emotions were narrowly differentiated, shame was found to be more dominant than guilt. Shame also yielded a greater focus on oneself. Contrary to the expectation of higher emotionality for the first language 18 Khadija Alaoui, Maura Pilotti, Huda Mulhem, Ebtesam Tallouzi, and Mona Mqbas (Arabic), language differences mostly underlined differences in participants’ focus of attention, either others or oneself. These findings are compared with those reported in the crosscultural literature, and implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Muslim Mental Health is an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed academic journal and publishes articles exploring social, cultural, medical, theological, historical, and psychological factors affecting the mental health of Muslims in the United States and globally. The journal publishes research and clinical material, including research articles, reviews, and reflections on clinical practice. The Journal of Muslim Mental Health is a much-needed resource for professionals seeking to identify and explore the mental health care needs of Muslims in all areas of the world.