战斗胸伤中呼吸系统功能障碍

O. Savushkina, P. Astanin, M. Malashenko, Igor V. Pyhtin, Ekaterina R. Kuzmina, A. A. Zaitsev
{"title":"战斗胸伤中呼吸系统功能障碍","authors":"O. Savushkina, P. Astanin, M. Malashenko, Igor V. Pyhtin, Ekaterina R. Kuzmina, A. A. Zaitsev","doi":"10.26442/20751753.2023.3.202191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Gunshot injuries occupy one of the leading places in a number of injuries (combat injuries) that occur in military conflicts. \nAim. To study the effect of gunshot wounds of the chest (penetrating and non-penetrating), as well as closed chest trauma on the respiratory function. \nMaterials and methods. The study included 78 patients with a diagnosis of combined trauma, including a gunshot penetrating/non-penetrating wound of the chest or closed chest injuries. The median period from injury to the time of lung function tests was 17 [15; 22] days. \nResults. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. All patients (100% males) underwent spirometry, body plethysmography, and diffusion test. The total sample was divided into two groups: group 1 (median age 27.5 [23.0; 36.0] years) 68 patients with gunshot penetrating chest wound, group 2 (median age 26.5 [20.0; 30.5] years) 10 patients with gunshot non-penetrating wound or closed chest trauma. In group 1, the medians of the vital capacity, forced vital capacity, inspiratory capacity, forced exhalation volume in 1 second, lung diffusion capacity (determined by the value of the carbon monoxide transfer-factor DLCO) and alveolar volume were reduced. In group 2, pulmonary ventilation parameters were within normal values while the median of DLCO was reduced. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. \nConclusion. Both gunshot penetrating wounds of the chest and gunshot non-penetrating wounds of the chest and closed chest injuries have a negative impact, including on the respiratory function, to a greater extent on lung diffusion capacity. It is necessary to create programs of drug correction and longer rehabilitation treatment of this category of patients.","PeriodicalId":10550,"journal":{"name":"Consilium Medicum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional disorders of the respiratory system in combat chest injury\",\"authors\":\"O. Savushkina, P. Astanin, M. Malashenko, Igor V. Pyhtin, Ekaterina R. Kuzmina, A. A. Zaitsev\",\"doi\":\"10.26442/20751753.2023.3.202191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Gunshot injuries occupy one of the leading places in a number of injuries (combat injuries) that occur in military conflicts. \\nAim. To study the effect of gunshot wounds of the chest (penetrating and non-penetrating), as well as closed chest trauma on the respiratory function. \\nMaterials and methods. The study included 78 patients with a diagnosis of combined trauma, including a gunshot penetrating/non-penetrating wound of the chest or closed chest injuries. The median period from injury to the time of lung function tests was 17 [15; 22] days. \\nResults. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. All patients (100% males) underwent spirometry, body plethysmography, and diffusion test. The total sample was divided into two groups: group 1 (median age 27.5 [23.0; 36.0] years) 68 patients with gunshot penetrating chest wound, group 2 (median age 26.5 [20.0; 30.5] years) 10 patients with gunshot non-penetrating wound or closed chest trauma. In group 1, the medians of the vital capacity, forced vital capacity, inspiratory capacity, forced exhalation volume in 1 second, lung diffusion capacity (determined by the value of the carbon monoxide transfer-factor DLCO) and alveolar volume were reduced. In group 2, pulmonary ventilation parameters were within normal values while the median of DLCO was reduced. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. \\nConclusion. Both gunshot penetrating wounds of the chest and gunshot non-penetrating wounds of the chest and closed chest injuries have a negative impact, including on the respiratory function, to a greater extent on lung diffusion capacity. It is necessary to create programs of drug correction and longer rehabilitation treatment of this category of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consilium Medicum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consilium Medicum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.3.202191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consilium Medicum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/20751753.2023.3.202191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在军事冲突中发生的许多伤害(战斗伤害)中,枪伤占据了主导地位。目标研究胸部枪伤(穿透性和非穿透性)以及闭合性胸部创伤对呼吸功能的影响。材料和方法。这项研究包括78名被诊断为合并创伤的患者,包括胸部枪伤/非枪伤或闭合性胸部损伤。从受伤到肺功能测试的中位时间为17[15;22]天。后果进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。所有患者(100%男性)均接受了肺活量测定、体积描记术和扩散试验。总样本分为两组:第1组(中位年龄27.5[23.0;36.0]岁)68名胸部枪伤穿透患者,第2组(中名年龄26.5[20.00;30.5]岁)10名胸部枪病非穿透伤或闭合性创伤患者。在第1组中,肺活量、强迫肺活量,吸气量,1秒内强迫呼气量,肺扩散能力(由一氧化碳转移因子DLCO的值决定)和肺泡体积的中位数降低。在第2组中,肺通气参数在正常值内,而DLCO的中位数降低。两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论胸部穿透性枪伤、胸部非穿透性枪病和胸部闭合性枪伤都会产生负面影响,包括对呼吸功能的影响,更大程度上影响肺的扩散能力。有必要为这类患者制定药物矫正和更长时间的康复治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional disorders of the respiratory system in combat chest injury
Background. Gunshot injuries occupy one of the leading places in a number of injuries (combat injuries) that occur in military conflicts. Aim. To study the effect of gunshot wounds of the chest (penetrating and non-penetrating), as well as closed chest trauma on the respiratory function. Materials and methods. The study included 78 patients with a diagnosis of combined trauma, including a gunshot penetrating/non-penetrating wound of the chest or closed chest injuries. The median period from injury to the time of lung function tests was 17 [15; 22] days. Results. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. All patients (100% males) underwent spirometry, body plethysmography, and diffusion test. The total sample was divided into two groups: group 1 (median age 27.5 [23.0; 36.0] years) 68 patients with gunshot penetrating chest wound, group 2 (median age 26.5 [20.0; 30.5] years) 10 patients with gunshot non-penetrating wound or closed chest trauma. In group 1, the medians of the vital capacity, forced vital capacity, inspiratory capacity, forced exhalation volume in 1 second, lung diffusion capacity (determined by the value of the carbon monoxide transfer-factor DLCO) and alveolar volume were reduced. In group 2, pulmonary ventilation parameters were within normal values while the median of DLCO was reduced. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusion. Both gunshot penetrating wounds of the chest and gunshot non-penetrating wounds of the chest and closed chest injuries have a negative impact, including on the respiratory function, to a greater extent on lung diffusion capacity. It is necessary to create programs of drug correction and longer rehabilitation treatment of this category of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信