美国手语第二语言学习者的纠正反馈

IF 0.5 Q3 LINGUISTICS
Leslie Gil, Laura Collins
{"title":"美国手语第二语言学习者的纠正反馈","authors":"Leslie Gil, Laura Collins","doi":"10.1353/sls.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This study examined the corrective feedback Deaf teachers used to target handshape, movement, and place-of-articulation errors in introductory American Sign Language (ASL) classes for hearing students. Although feedback is underresearched in bimodal second language (M2-L2) pedagogy, there is some evidence that teacher practices may differ from those observed in spoken L2 classes, notably in the more frequent use of direct corrections. Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) reports that the teachers' preference for this type of correction stemmed from beliefs about the challenges of learning signed language phonology. Spoken L2 research suggests that a reliance on this type of feedback may limit students' opportunities to learn from their errors, as the nontarget form is corrected for the student and is not often followed by student \"repair\" of the original error (Panova and Lyster 2002). As student response to teacher feedback was not examined in Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study, we do not know if M2-L2 students show similar behavior. The current study was designed to address this issue, examining both teacher feedback practices and student responses to feedback.Four sections of ASL 101, taught by two different teachers at two different universities, were observed for over thirty hours. An observation grid developed for the study, based on Lyster and Ranta's (1997) feedback categories, captured the linguistic target, feedback strategy, and student response to feedback. Semistructured interviews (adapted from Willoughby et al. 2015) probed teachers' perspectives on ASL acquisition and pedagogy. The results confirmed that direct correction was the most common feedback type (>60%). The findings also revealed that, in contrast with spoken language contexts, student repetition of the reformulation was frequent (>90%), influenced by both teachers' encouragement of this behavior. Factors associated with greater teacher focus on movement and handshape errors, and the contribution of M2-L2 contexts to understanding feedback in second language acquisition are discussed.","PeriodicalId":21753,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"668 - 702"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrective Feedback to Second Language Learners of American Sign Language\",\"authors\":\"Leslie Gil, Laura Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sls.2022.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This study examined the corrective feedback Deaf teachers used to target handshape, movement, and place-of-articulation errors in introductory American Sign Language (ASL) classes for hearing students. Although feedback is underresearched in bimodal second language (M2-L2) pedagogy, there is some evidence that teacher practices may differ from those observed in spoken L2 classes, notably in the more frequent use of direct corrections. Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) reports that the teachers' preference for this type of correction stemmed from beliefs about the challenges of learning signed language phonology. Spoken L2 research suggests that a reliance on this type of feedback may limit students' opportunities to learn from their errors, as the nontarget form is corrected for the student and is not often followed by student \\\"repair\\\" of the original error (Panova and Lyster 2002). As student response to teacher feedback was not examined in Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study, we do not know if M2-L2 students show similar behavior. The current study was designed to address this issue, examining both teacher feedback practices and student responses to feedback.Four sections of ASL 101, taught by two different teachers at two different universities, were observed for over thirty hours. An observation grid developed for the study, based on Lyster and Ranta's (1997) feedback categories, captured the linguistic target, feedback strategy, and student response to feedback. Semistructured interviews (adapted from Willoughby et al. 2015) probed teachers' perspectives on ASL acquisition and pedagogy. The results confirmed that direct correction was the most common feedback type (>60%). The findings also revealed that, in contrast with spoken language contexts, student repetition of the reformulation was frequent (>90%), influenced by both teachers' encouragement of this behavior. Factors associated with greater teacher focus on movement and handshape errors, and the contribution of M2-L2 contexts to understanding feedback in second language acquisition are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Language Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"668 - 702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2022.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究调查了聋人教师在听力学生的美国手语入门课上针对手势、动作和发音错误的纠正反馈。尽管反馈在双峰第二语言(M2-L2)教学法中被低估,但有一些证据表明,教师的做法可能与在口语第二语言课堂上观察到的做法不同,尤其是在更频繁地使用直接纠正方面。Willoughby等人(2015)对Auslan(澳大利亚手语)的研究报告称,教师对这种类型的纠正的偏好源于对学习手语音韵学挑战的信念。口语二语研究表明,依赖这种类型的反馈可能会限制学生从错误中学习的机会,因为非目标形式是为学生纠正的,而学生通常不会对原始错误进行“修复”(Panova和Lyster,2002年)。由于Willoughby等人(2015)的研究没有考察学生对教师反馈的反应,我们不知道M2-L2学生是否表现出类似的行为。目前的研究旨在解决这个问题,研究教师的反馈实践和学生对反馈的反应。ASL 101的四个部分由两所不同大学的两名不同教师教授,观察了30多个小时。根据Lyster和Ranta(1997)的反馈类别,为这项研究开发了一个观察网格,捕捉了语言目标、反馈策略和学生对反馈的反应。半结构化访谈(改编自Willoughby等人,2015)探讨了教师对ASL习得和教育学的看法。结果证实,直接校正是最常见的反馈类型(>60%)。研究结果还表明,与口语环境相比,受两位教师对这种行为的鼓励影响,学生对重新表述的重复频率较高(>90%)。讨论了教师更多地关注动作和手势错误的相关因素,以及M2-L2语境对理解第二语言习得中的反馈的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corrective Feedback to Second Language Learners of American Sign Language
Abstract:This study examined the corrective feedback Deaf teachers used to target handshape, movement, and place-of-articulation errors in introductory American Sign Language (ASL) classes for hearing students. Although feedback is underresearched in bimodal second language (M2-L2) pedagogy, there is some evidence that teacher practices may differ from those observed in spoken L2 classes, notably in the more frequent use of direct corrections. Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study of Auslan (Australian Sign Language) reports that the teachers' preference for this type of correction stemmed from beliefs about the challenges of learning signed language phonology. Spoken L2 research suggests that a reliance on this type of feedback may limit students' opportunities to learn from their errors, as the nontarget form is corrected for the student and is not often followed by student "repair" of the original error (Panova and Lyster 2002). As student response to teacher feedback was not examined in Willoughby et al.'s (2015) study, we do not know if M2-L2 students show similar behavior. The current study was designed to address this issue, examining both teacher feedback practices and student responses to feedback.Four sections of ASL 101, taught by two different teachers at two different universities, were observed for over thirty hours. An observation grid developed for the study, based on Lyster and Ranta's (1997) feedback categories, captured the linguistic target, feedback strategy, and student response to feedback. Semistructured interviews (adapted from Willoughby et al. 2015) probed teachers' perspectives on ASL acquisition and pedagogy. The results confirmed that direct correction was the most common feedback type (>60%). The findings also revealed that, in contrast with spoken language contexts, student repetition of the reformulation was frequent (>90%), influenced by both teachers' encouragement of this behavior. Factors associated with greater teacher focus on movement and handshape errors, and the contribution of M2-L2 contexts to understanding feedback in second language acquisition are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sign Language Studies
Sign Language Studies LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Sign Language Studies publishes a wide range of original scholarly articles and essays relevant to signed languages and signing communities. The journal provides a forum for the dissemination of important ideas and opinions concerning these languages and the communities who use them. Topics of interest include linguistics, anthropology, semiotics, Deaf culture, and Deaf history and literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信